I am just a casual photographer.
I currently own Canon's EF 70-200mm F/4L IS USM lens and have Canon 5D Mark II.
Thinking about switching to prime telephoto lens of Canon's. (f/2 or f/2.8)
Need a faster glass for indoor or under low light situations. (faster glass)
Can't afford 70-200 f/2.8 verisions at this time.
So I was searching online and I came down to two Canon's telephoto lenses.
- EF 135mm f/2L USM
- EF 200mm f/2.8 II USM
FIrst of all, I heard a lot of good reviews of 135L in terms of bokeh and image quality. I am not too sure If the focal length of 135mm is favorable to me as I already own 100L Macro. (unless I use the teleconverter).
Don't know about 200mm f/2.8 II USM lens. Haven't heard much reviews about this lens. But that 200mm length will be useful to me.
Anyone has the 200mmf/2.8 II USM prime lens, please let me know its performance!
(Any disadvantage other than the flexible focal length like 70-200?)
Any other lens choice or inputs are greatly appreciated.
Thank you all in advance!