Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 08 Aug 2013 (Thursday) 19:39
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

BG-E7 fit on 7D leaves a large gap between the body and the grip.

 
Richard ­ N
Member
Avatar
125 posts
Joined Sep 2012
Location: Victoria BC, CA
     
Aug 08, 2013 19:39 |  #1

Well it's like the title says; mounting my Canon BG-E7 grip to the body leaves a large gap. I've tried it without the battery compartment door in it's storage place, thinking that might be the problem. However it changed nothing.

The thumb wheel seems to be turning freely, so there is no binding on the threads. I can't see anything that should be causing this to not seat flush...

I'm going to try and get a picture showing the fit...

Anyone have any ideas?

EDIT: Okay here is the picture.

IMAGE: https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-R9UWImgTr7k/UgQ_Ttm4XVI/AAAAAAAAArQ/vj6sSTt_-Wo/s800/IMG_6904.jpg

flickr (external link) - (Coming Soon)
My Gear List
Marketplace Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Richard ­ N
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
125 posts
Joined Sep 2012
Location: Victoria BC, CA
     
Aug 08, 2013 23:01 |  #2

Okay, so Google is turning up nothing. I think I'm seeing the problem though.

The rubber foot around the tripod mount seems to be the culprit, peeling it off allows the grip to seat tight to the body.

I'm not very happy about this...

Has anyone ever seen or heard of this before with an OEM grip?


flickr (external link) - (Coming Soon)
My Gear List
Marketplace Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
apersson850
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,721 posts
Gallery: 35 photos
Likes: 672
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Traryd, Sweden
     
Aug 09, 2013 03:16 as a reply to  @ Richard N's post |  #3

Isn't there an alignment pin going into a hole where you have the gap? Dirt in the hole, perhaps?


Anders

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lowner
"I'm the original idiot"
Avatar
12,924 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Salisbury, UK.
     
Aug 09, 2013 05:37 |  #4

Richard N wrote in post #16193026 (external link)
The rubber foot around the tripod mount seems to be the culprit, peeling it off allows the grip to seat tight to the body.

Odd. I've just had a look at my 5D2 and BG-E6. There is no rubber foot around the tripod mount thread at all. Are you sure its an original part on your camera?


Richard

http://rcb4344.zenfoli​o.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Furlan
Senior Member
867 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Nov 2012
     
Aug 09, 2013 05:44 |  #5

Richard N wrote in post #16193026 (external link)
Okay, so Google is turning up nothing. I think I'm seeing the problem though.

The rubber foot around the tripod mount seems to be the culprit, peeling it off allows the grip to seat tight to the body.

I'm not very happy about this...

Has anyone ever seen or heard of this before with an OEM grip?

The so called rubber foot is not part of the camera. Be happy.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lowner
"I'm the original idiot"
Avatar
12,924 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Salisbury, UK.
     
Aug 09, 2013 05:59 |  #6

Furlan wrote in post #16193487 (external link)
The so called rubber foot is not part of the camera. Be happy.

Problem solved!


Richard

http://rcb4344.zenfoli​o.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
adammazza
Senior Member
505 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 4
Joined Jul 2006
     
Aug 09, 2013 08:06 as a reply to  @ Lowner's post |  #7

Where did you get the BG-E7 from? Are you sure it's a Canon?


Canon 5Dm3, Fuji X100T, Fuji X-T1, Fuji X70
Canon 70-200mm L F/2.8 IS
Canon 24-105mm L F/4.0 IS
Sigma 35mm F/1.4, Sigma 85mm F/1.4
Fuji 16mm F/1.4, Fuji 35mm F/1.4, Fuji 56mm F/1.2, Fuji 16-55 F/2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
amfoto1
Cream of the Crop
10,331 posts
Likes: 146
Joined Aug 2007
Location: San Jose, California
     
Aug 09, 2013 08:33 |  #8

The rubber insert around the tripod mounting screw hole should be very close to flush with surfaces around it. It should be fitted into a shallow recess in the base of the camera. I can see in the photo that the rubber is thicker than normal, standing proud of the surrounding surfaces and keeping the grip from seating fully on the bottom of the camera.

Maybe your camera has two layers of rubber there? Perhaps it was accidentally doubled up when the camera was manufactured? I imagine on the assembly line those rubber strips are just quickly applied by a worker. That might have been done twice to your particular camera or for some other reason it got doubled up. If that happened, it would be easy to miss during final inspection and packing, too. Otherwise, maybe the rubber insert is thicker than normal... though I can't imagine how that would happen. Remove it... see if it appears doubled. If so, remove the extra layer and the problem is solved. If not... if it's a single layer of rubber but thicker than normal... ask Canon for a replacement part.

I have two 7Ds with BG-E7s (OEM) and both fit just fine... no gap there and the anti-slip rubber right around the tripod mounting screw hole is virtually flush with the surrounding area.


Alan Myers (external link) "Walk softly and carry a big lens."
5DII, 7DII, 7D, M5 & others. 10-22mm, Meike 12/2.8,Tokina 12-24/4, 20/2.8, EF-M 22/2, TS 24/3.5L, 24-70/2.8L, 28/1.8, 28-135 IS (x2), TS 45/2.8, 50/1.4, Sigma 56/1.4, Tamron 60/2.0, 70-200/4L IS, 70-200/2.8 IS, 85/1.8, Tamron 90/2.5, 100/2.8 USM, 100-400L II, 135/2L, 180/3.5L, 300/4L IS, 300/2.8L IS, 500/4L IS, EF 1.4X II, EF 2X II. Flashes, strobes & various access. - FLICKR (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Richard ­ N
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
125 posts
Joined Sep 2012
Location: Victoria BC, CA
     
Aug 09, 2013 21:09 |  #9

The grip is an OEM from Adorama, I'm pretty sure it's legit.

It's the rubber insert, pad, foot, whatever name it goes by, that surrounds the tripod mount screw hole. I did peel it off and it was just a single one, so not doubled up at the factory. It does seem quite thick and it's no were near flush with the bottom of the body.

All I can think of is Canon had a batch of these rubber pads that were out of spec and they made it into production.

I wonder if Canon would send me a thinner one if I email them? This is a used body and without warranty... I'm guessing it wouldn't be worth their effort. For such a small thing I'm really quite irritated by this. :(


flickr (external link) - (Coming Soon)
My Gear List
Marketplace Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Furlan
Senior Member
867 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Nov 2012
     
Aug 10, 2013 08:17 |  #10

I have in front of me a T3i, 5Dc, 50D, 60D and a 7D the 7D is the only one with a rubber pad. The
bill of material pad is rectangular in shape about 1.75" long and 1" wide with two curved notches one
large at the rear around the tripod mount and a small one towards the front for a small screw. If this
is what your peeling away you have a problem anything else it doesn't belong there. Was the camera
purchased new,refurb.or used? I'm also thinking peeling away the bill of material pad would not be that easy. It would be nice if some other 7D owners would chime in.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Richard ­ N
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
125 posts
Joined Sep 2012
Location: Victoria BC, CA
     
Aug 10, 2013 13:42 |  #11

Furlan wrote in post #16196191 (external link)
I have in front of me a T3i, 5Dc, 50D, 60D and a 7D the 7D is the only one with a rubber pad. The
bill of material pad is rectangular in shape about 1.75" long and 1" wide with two curved notches one
large at the rear around the tripod mount and a small one towards the front for a small screw. If this
is what your peeling away you have a problem anything else it doesn't belong there. Was the camera
purchased new,refurb.or used? I'm also thinking peeling away the bill of material pad would not be that easy. It would be nice if some other 7D owners would chime in.

Yes the rubber pad you are describing is the offending piece. It is stock to the camera, it was not added after.

I have a T1i here also and it doesn't have the rubber pad but it does have the same grooved texture to a portion of the body, as does my roommates T3. It's there to allow any tripod attachment using a soft cork or rubber contact surface to have some purchase on the body. This prevents it from rotating on a smooth surface in spite of the mounting screw.

Here is a picture of the bottom of a 7D just to make it clear. Not mine but it makes the point.

IMAGE: http://www.steves-digicams.com/camera-reviews/canon_7d_bottom.jpg

This rubber pad on my 7D is too thick and stops the grip from seating flush to the bottom of the body. It's only held on by some contact cement and peeling it off lets the grip mount the way it's meant to. If it matters the camera was purchased used.

flickr (external link) - (Coming Soon)
My Gear List
Marketplace Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
snerd
Senior Member
Avatar
669 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 195
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Oklahoma
     
Aug 10, 2013 14:18 |  #12

Last time I took my 7D off the quick-release mount on my tripod, I noticed the rubber mat on the bottom was twisted up on one end. I figured I turned it too much when tightening to the mount. I just pushed it back down and squeegeed it smooth again. But it never interfered with seating to the grip before that.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lowner
"I'm the original idiot"
Avatar
12,924 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Salisbury, UK.
     
Aug 11, 2013 03:54 |  #13

Richard N,

Your picture makes it look flush with the base. I cannot see it standing proud.


Richard

http://rcb4344.zenfoli​o.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Richard ­ N
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
125 posts
Joined Sep 2012
Location: Victoria BC, CA
     
Aug 11, 2013 12:28 |  #14

Lowner wrote in post #16197990 (external link)
Richard N,

Your picture makes it look flush with the base. I cannot see it standing proud.

So that large of a gap is typical of an installed grip on the 7D body?

I just can't see how this would provide a weather tight seal for the body's battery compartment. At the very least it allows for a collection point for dust and dirt. It seems to me to be very poor design on Canon's part.


flickr (external link) - (Coming Soon)
My Gear List
Marketplace Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jmcgee131
Member
Avatar
249 posts
Gallery: 25 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 78
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Indianapolis
     
Aug 11, 2013 12:41 |  #15

I think he was referring to the picture of the 7D on its back. I would suggest using a picture of your 7D as opposed to a someone else simply because your 7D is the one in question.


Feed back #1#2
Learning to read light one click at a time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,706 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
BG-E7 fit on 7D leaves a large gap between the body and the grip.
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
2033 guests, 115 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.