Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 06 Sep 2013 (Friday) 13:05
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Frustrated

 
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Sep 07, 2013 06:00 |  #16

Tanya, a couple things are mixed up. You show a couple landscapes, and they seem to be fine, but then you talk about your daughter being out of focus, could you please post some examples? A tripod surely works for the landscapes, but share the details about the shots of your daughter!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
birdfromboat
Goldmember
Avatar
1,839 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2008
Location: somewhere in Oregon trying to keep this laptop dry
     
Sep 07, 2013 08:47 |  #17

tanyag wrote in post #16274960 (external link)
Birdfromboat... Do you use a tripod for motocross??

Only for comic relief or to hold a beverage while I my hands are full.

No, you misunderstand or got some posts mixed up. Tripods are great for stationary objects like a landscape or for really long shots like wildlife or for macro work where camera shake is a deal breaker. Motocross panning is all hand held, swinging the camera from side to side trying to keep one rider in focus and in perfect position in the view as they pass- called panning and really hard to do but extremely rewarding. IS will try to compensate for the motion and kill a shot that might have been wonderful if the electronics hadn't done battle with the image blurr.

Basically, IS helps when YOU are in motion, like on a boat or in a car or when you drink too much coffee, wider apertures and higher ISO's (and the faster shutters they allow) work when the subject is in motion like while panning a passing motocrosser.

I decided I would rather spend my money on wider apertures that help with low light conditions and motocross than on IS. I struggle with longer hand held exposures, sure. Just like I did for years and years before IS came along. No substitute for fast lenses and good technique.


5D, 10D, G10, the required 100 macro, 24-70, 70-200 f/2.8, 300 f2.8)
Looking through a glass un-yun

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PeteD
Goldmember
Avatar
2,953 posts
Likes: 1152
Joined Apr 2010
Location: North Carolina
     
Sep 07, 2013 08:50 |  #18

tanyag wrote in post #16274928 (external link)
Thanks everyone, truly. So much great advice.

I need to know more about the tripod, turn off IS issue though. I never drag out my tripod. I find it cumbersome and I tend to move around a lot. But I didn't know I should be using one for landscape stuff. I don't understand why we have image stabilization if we're just supposed to shut it off?? Could someone please explain this further? Would I only do this for landscape shots?

Tripod allows you to use a slower ISO like 100. By doing that you will have better detail and less noise/static in your shots when you zoom in or enlarge them.

For the IS being turned of,,,,,,,when on a tripod you will have no movement so you do not need it. And on top of that a lot of cameras will actually move the IS to check for movement and make sure the system is working.So when on a tripod it needs to be turned off.


I don't suffer from insanity. I enjoy it!!
52weeks completed (external link)
My 365 thread on the Camel (external link)
P & A Photos Flickr (external link)
P & A Photos Photobucket (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2611
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Sep 07, 2013 08:57 |  #19

tanyag wrote in post #16274447 (external link)
... I think my main problem is focus. However, the funny thing is, my focus is pretty spot on when shooting motocross.

I notice that the first image is 1/40 sec with a 95mm lens, so maybe you have some camera shake involved.

But when I try to take a picture of my daughter sitting perfectly still, it's off.

Are you using AI Servo & focusing right on her eyes? Let's see an image?


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tanyag
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
36 posts
Joined Oct 2011
     
Sep 07, 2013 09:18 as a reply to  @ PhotosGuy's post |  #20

Thanks again everyone. I think I understand what you are saying about the IS/tripod... I rarely pan when shooting motocross. I like the frozen look so I shoot with a very fast shutter speed.
I can't find any images that are out of focus (because, out of frustration, I send them all to the recycle bin). I will keep the next batch to show you though.
I think my other issue lies with focal length. I am really trying to figure it out but I can't seem to wrap my brain around it. I KNOW that plays into some of my crappy images, for sure. I will keep working on it though.
Thanks again for your time and advice everyone. You've boosted my confidence. Sometimes I feel like this whole photography thing is just too technical for me! LOL... Especially when I look back at old baby pictures that I took with a cheap point and shoot and they are just as good, if not better than the ones I take with my multi-million dollar set-up! I'll keep on truckin' though. Thanks!


Cannon Rebel T1i ~ 18-55mm, 75-300mm
"The L does not refer to lens"... lesson learned. ;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tanyag
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
36 posts
Joined Oct 2011
     
Sep 07, 2013 09:20 |  #21

PhotosGuy wrote in post #16275890 (external link)
I notice that the first image is 1/40 sec with a 95mm lens, so maybe you have some camera shake involved.
Are you using AI Servo & focusing right on her eyes? Let's see an image?

Yes, I am using AI servo and I try my best to focus on the eye. The whole focus/recompose is confusing to me too though.


Cannon Rebel T1i ~ 18-55mm, 75-300mm
"The L does not refer to lens"... lesson learned. ;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2611
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Sep 07, 2013 14:51 |  #22

tanyag wrote in post #16275940 (external link)
Yes, I am using AI servo and I try my best to focus on the eye. The whole focus/recompose is confusing to me too though.

"focus/recompose"? NO, no, no! Look at post #4 here for why that doesn't work some of the time: https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1210058

That defeats the whole idea of AI Servo! What you should be doing is to use the Custom Functions to select a focus point so you can keep the focus on the eyes so when you move a fraction of an inch & they move a fraction of an inch the eyes stay in focus.

In the Custom Functions I can put point selection on the Multicontroller (Joystick), & life becomes a lot easier shooting portraits with a shallow DOF. It only takes a fraction of a second to set the point I need.


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
OhLook
insufferably pedantic. I can live with that.
Avatar
24,953 posts
Gallery: 105 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 16394
Joined Dec 2012
Location: California: SF Bay Area
     
Sep 07, 2013 15:52 |  #23

PeteD wrote in post #16275879 (external link)
For the IS being turned of,,,,,,,when on a tripod you will have no movement so you do not need it. And on top of that a lot of cameras will actually move the IS to check for movement and make sure the system is working.So when on a tripod it needs to be turned off.

Does it follow that IS should be turned off when (1) the camera is braced against something solid, or (2) the shutter speed is fast, say, 1/250 or better?


PRONOUN ADVISORY: OhLook is a she. | Comments welcome
The new forum developed by POTN members is open to all:
https://focusonphotogr​aphy.community.forum/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PeteD
Goldmember
Avatar
2,953 posts
Likes: 1152
Joined Apr 2010
Location: North Carolina
     
Sep 07, 2013 16:19 |  #24

Don't know. but I do know if it is going to be there for a while it would be best to turn it off. Especially if you are using the built in timer. When it snaps the shutter, the lens will pick up that movement and try to compensate. Even though the camera is not moving


I don't suffer from insanity. I enjoy it!!
52weeks completed (external link)
My 365 thread on the Camel (external link)
P & A Photos Flickr (external link)
P & A Photos Photobucket (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Sep 07, 2013 21:43 |  #25

A couple of points:

First off, regarding IS with a tripod, there are a couple scenarios. First is one where you want a longer shutter speed and are shooting "hands off", like the self-timer or mirror lock-up. What can happen is that as your are waiting for the shutter release, the lens IS can actually de-activate, which will cause the focus to "slump". It will vary with the lens, but I know that with a long focal length this can be bad!

With other shooting scenarios, some people describe the IS as "vibrating" when there is no actual camera/lens movement.

However, there are occasions when I'm shooting with a long focal length, using a tripod but doing "hands-on" shooting, as I've done with some distant wildlife. In those cases, you see camera shake very clearly, and IS helps!

As to motorsports, Tanya, you could benefit from learning about Panning, where you keep the vehicle in focus, using and aperture such as f/8, but you have your shutter speed slowed down as you "follow" the vehicle (AI Servo AF). As a result, you see the "blurry" background but a nice sharp/crisp vehicle!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2611
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Sep 08, 2013 10:11 |  #26

tanyag wrote in post #16274928 (external link)
I don't understand why we have image stabilization if we're just supposed to shut it off??

There's a nice image that illustrates the effect of using IS on a tripod here:
A lesson learned or Engage brain before operating shutter


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DC ­ Fan
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,881 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 53
Joined Oct 2005
     
Sep 08, 2013 16:25 |  #27

tanyag wrote in post #16273584 (external link)
Hi Folks... I've been playing with photography for the last year or so. I have a Canon
7d and recently splurged on the 70-200 2.8 IS. My son races motocross so that was my primary focus and I found I was able to get decent shots most of the time. Lately, however, I've tried different types of photography and I'm getting so incredibly frustrated. I think I'm just overwhelmed with the depth of knowledge involved. I guess my question is... What should a beginner photographer really focus on? What is most important when it comes to getting a sharp, in focus image? I feel like I have at least a basic understanding but when I try to apply it, I'm totally disappointed. Any tips? I'm losing confidence really quickly!

The best way to gain confidence is to study photography with an experienced human instructor. There is no overnight success. Typically, years of work and gradual learning will be needed.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tanyag
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
36 posts
Joined Oct 2011
     
Sep 12, 2013 11:46 |  #28

PhotosGuy wrote in post #16278537 (external link)
There's a nice image that illustrates the effect of using IS on a tripod here:
A lesson learned or Engage brain before operating shutter

Thanks. It always helps to have an actual image. I think I'm getting it.


Cannon Rebel T1i ~ 18-55mm, 75-300mm
"The L does not refer to lens"... lesson learned. ;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tanyag
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
36 posts
Joined Oct 2011
     
Sep 12, 2013 11:48 |  #29

DC Fan wrote in post #16279435 (external link)
The best way to gain confidence is to study photography with an experienced human instructor. There is no overnight success. Typically, years of work and gradual learning will be needed.

Yeah, I'm a very impatient person and tend to get bored quickly. These are not great characteristics when learning photography! LOL. I DO want to get good at it though and I've invested quite a bit of money at this point so I'm determined to stick it out. Thanks for the advice.


Cannon Rebel T1i ~ 18-55mm, 75-300mm
"The L does not refer to lens"... lesson learned. ;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
benji25
Goldmember
Avatar
1,189 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 281
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Twin Cities
     
Sep 12, 2013 11:55 |  #30

When looking for a crisp image I would check in this order

1. Shutter speed (is it at least 1/Focal Length?) and fast enough for whaterver you are shooting (Fast object v. still object)

2. Aperture - are you using the appropriate aperture to get a depth of field that has everything in focus? Is the aperture you are using the "sweet spot" of your lense?

3. Camera shake - is your Image Stableization turned on?

4. Lense - Do you have a quality lense that can actually produce a sharp image (most can if the settings above #4 are correct)


Website (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,631 views & 0 likes for this thread, 17 members have posted to it.
Frustrated
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2292 guests, 150 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.