Whats your take on the set?
http://www.derekcopenhaver.com/montana-katie
Springs32 Member 95 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2010 More info | Oct 20, 2013 14:54 | #1 Whats your take on the set? http://www.derekcopenhaver.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vengence Goldmember 2,103 posts Likes: 107 Joined Mar 2013 More info | Oct 20, 2013 17:48 | #2 I think there are some neat and fun shots in there, but the constant over exposed backgrounds kinda kills it for me. They are incredibly distracting and I find my self doing nothing but staring at the sun. The best pictures in that set have nothing to do with a sun behind them IMHO.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
olafs osh I am a nice and fluffy dude ![]() More info | Oct 20, 2013 18:48 | #3 Disagree. I find this set very well done. - Olafs Osh
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 20, 2013 20:27 | #4 I think a few of the crops are abit tight but overall, very nice work.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mannetti21 Goldmember ![]() More info | Oct 20, 2013 22:31 | #5 I think some of the backgrounds are a bit distracting, in particular the ones with the cars and fences. I imagine that is the reason some of the images are cropped tightly, to get rid of the background. Other than that, I feel like something is missing. Hard to pin point why, but many of the images don't convey the sense of "engagement shoot" to me. Not necessarily your fault, but the couple doesn't seem to be connecting in the photos. ---------------
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KirkS518 Goldmember ![]() 3,983 posts Likes: 24 Joined Apr 2012 Location: Central Gulf Coast, Flori-duh More info | Oct 20, 2013 22:53 | #6 mannetti21 wrote in post #16386295 ![]() I think some of the backgrounds are a bit distracting, in particular the ones with the cars and fences. I imagine that is the reason some of the images are cropped tightly, to get rid of the background. Other than that, I feel like something is missing. Hard to pin point why, but many of the images don't convey the sense of "engagement shoot" to me. Not necessarily your fault, but the couple doesn't seem to be connecting in the photos. With that said, I don't think they are bad by any means. Just providing some feedback for you to consider next time. I can't believe I'm saying this, because I fully respect and enjoy mannetti21's work, but I have to disagree with the bolded sentance. To me, the set has a very 'connected' feel between the two, and they look very natural, comfortable, and in love. If steroids are illegal for athletes, should PS be illegal for models?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mannetti21 Goldmember ![]() More info | Oct 20, 2013 23:11 | #7 I think connected was the wrong word. Looking through them again, they do indeed seem to be interacting with each other in a playful way. They look to be laughing/giggling in most of the photos. Maybe I was expecting/hoping for some shots were they were connecting on a more intimate and serious level. But hey, every couple/relationship is different and I suppose my (your) expectations as the photographer are pretty irrelevant. So long as the client is happy with the final product! ---------------
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CanonVsNikon Senior Member 255 posts Joined Jan 2013 More info | Oct 21, 2013 09:49 | #8 ![]() KirkS518 wrote in post #16386333 ![]() I can't believe I'm saying this, because I fully respect and enjoy mannetti21's work, but I have to disagree with the bolded sentance. To me, the set has a very 'connected' feel between the two, and they look very natural, comfortable, and in love. Nice set. ![]() I agree, they look very natural and connected. More so than others I have seen
LOG IN TO REPLY |
HiepBuiPhotography Goldmember 1,612 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2012 Location: Harrisburg, PA More info | Oct 21, 2013 10:25 | #9 I think it's a pretty good set. It lacks some variety though. Also, it looks like you missed focus on a bunch of them. It might just be hard to tell since the photos are a little small. They may very well be in focus. Hiep Bui Photography | Harrisburg Wedding Photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 21, 2013 10:45 | #10 i like them alot, its great when a couple can convey fun like this. personally i'd like to see the WB at bit warmer, especially since the sun is so prominent. Canon 5d mkii | Canon 17-40/4L | Tamron 24-70/2.8 | Canon 85/1.8 | Canon 135/2L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 23, 2013 06:45 | #11 |
chocolatekara Senior Member 286 posts Likes: 10 Joined Oct 2013 Location: Adelaide, South Australia More info | Oct 23, 2013 23:34 | #12 I'm probably completely off the mark, but some of them felt a little distorted. _______________
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 24, 2013 19:11 | #13 These are great and very candid and natural. I'm sure your clients love them because you're capturing "them" as they are naturaly. I looked through your other sets too. Very nice work. 6D | 7D MkII | 16-35 f4L | 35 f1.2L II | 135 f2L | 180 f3.5L | 400 f5.6L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 25, 2013 21:04 | #14 Thanks for all the responses and critiques everyone. Ill take it all into consideration! Im always trying to learn and get better to further develop my style and broaden my skills! http://www.derekcopenhaver.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
Latest registered member is henry65 892 guests, 251 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |