Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 25 Oct 2013 (Friday) 21:24
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Best lens for Studio work AND sports?

 
jonathanheierle
Senior Member
Avatar
714 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 171
Joined Aug 2013
Location: Eastern Oregon
     
Oct 25, 2013 21:24 |  #1

Right now i have a wide angle and a 70-200 but i want an inbetween lens that can do macro/studio work and fast action sports, i know the both are pretty different kinds of disciplines but IMO a 24-105 would be the best lens, and to use the Extension tube when doing studio work, give me your input, thanks!


Canon EOS R5, RF 15-35 f/2.8, RF 70-200 f/2.8, RF 50mm f/1.2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chris_holtmeier
Goldmember
Avatar
2,213 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 3012
Joined Sep 2011
Location: Omaha
     
Oct 25, 2013 21:29 |  #2

Macro and sports don't usually describe a single lens. Macros tend to focus slowly.



https://www.facebook.c​om/FotonFoto (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
328iGuy
Goldmember
Avatar
3,635 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 806
Joined Dec 2004
Location: Ottawa | Ontario
     
Oct 25, 2013 21:43 |  #3

One of my favourite studio lens out of all of mine is my 70-200LII and then probably the 85LII


R3 | R6 II | 8-15L | 15-35L 2.8 | 28-70L F2 | 85L 1.2 | 70-200L 2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jmcgee131
Member
Avatar
249 posts
Gallery: 25 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 78
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Indianapolis
     
Oct 25, 2013 21:43 |  #4

I would also add that the F4 aperture for studio and macro are OK, but for sports where shutter speed is all more important, You gain a a full stop from the F2.8 lens in this area. I would think for all described requirements to be met you are looking for a 24-70, with extension tubes. The new versions of the 24-70's hitting the market are all receiving rave reviews, I love my MKII, but that's what I wanted, you may find some of the reviews for the other brands and feel those meet your needs and financial situation.


Feed back #1#2
Learning to read light one click at a time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ceegee
Goldmember
2,335 posts
Likes: 34
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Montreal, Quebec
     
Oct 25, 2013 22:00 |  #5

I love my 24-105 in the studio, and it does a very good job on fast-moving subjects outdoors, provided the light is good. I haven't used it for macro, though (I have a Canon 60 mm macro lens as well)


Gear: Canon R10, Canon RFS 18-150, Canon RF 100-400

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jonathanheierle
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
714 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 171
Joined Aug 2013
Location: Eastern Oregon
     
Oct 25, 2013 23:06 |  #6

if i could get the 24-70 i would get it right now, but its WAY out of my price range haha its one of my dream lenses along with the 70-200 II


Canon EOS R5, RF 15-35 f/2.8, RF 70-200 f/2.8, RF 50mm f/1.2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
18,407 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 3429
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
     
Oct 26, 2013 01:16 |  #7

how big is your studio space? and what kind of studio shots are you trying to pull off that you'd be using an extension tube?


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jonathanheierle
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
714 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 171
Joined Aug 2013
Location: Eastern Oregon
     
Oct 26, 2013 10:01 |  #8

DreDaze wrote in post #16399976 (external link)
how big is your studio space? and what kind of studio shots are you trying to pull off that you'd be using an extension tube?

unfortunately its not very big, probably 12 feet wide and 15 feet long its a pretty small room


Canon EOS R5, RF 15-35 f/2.8, RF 70-200 f/2.8, RF 50mm f/1.2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
18,407 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 3429
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
     
Oct 26, 2013 11:12 |  #9

jonathanheierle wrote in post #16400609 (external link)
unfortunately its not very big, probably 12 feet wide and 15 feet long its a pretty small room

but what kind of studio work are you trying to do? when i see studio, i think portraits...but there'd be no point of using an extension tube for that work...

i move around furniture in my apt, and come up with a space that is around the same size, my typical lens that i use is my 35f2, so i would think the 24-105mm would work for some portraits


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Echo63
Goldmember
Avatar
2,868 posts
Likes: 169
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Perth - Western Australia - Earth
     
Oct 26, 2013 11:13 |  #10

DreDaze wrote in post #16399976 (external link)
how big is your studio space? and what kind of studio shots are you trying to pull off that you'd be using an extension tube?

He is talking about an Extension tube - not a Teleconverter.
Extension tubes are essentially a tube with a lens bayonet on one end, a body bayonet on the other, and electronic contacts for AF and Aperture - by moving the lens away from the sensor, the lenses minimum focus distance is reduced, allowing macro photos to be taken


My Best Imageswww.echo63.deviantart.​com (external link)
Gear listhttps://photography-on-the.net …p?p=2463426&pos​tcount=385

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
18,407 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 3429
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
     
Oct 26, 2013 11:15 |  #11

Echo63 wrote in post #16400809 (external link)
He is talking about an Extension tube - not a Teleconverter.
Extension tubes are essentially a tube with a lens bayonet on one end, a body bayonet on the other, and electronic contacts for AF and Aperture - by moving the lens away from the sensor, the lenses minimum focus distance is reduced, allowing macro photos to be taken

thanks...but i know what an extension tube is...and i still don't see the point for people, as the focus that you're able to achieve is reduced a ton...so he'd only be able to probably focus out 5ft away...

it would be fine if he was taking macro shots, but i haven't seen where he said that

whoops: now i see it :)


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Echo63
Goldmember
Avatar
2,868 posts
Likes: 169
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Perth - Western Australia - Earth
     
Oct 26, 2013 11:20 |  #12

DreDaze wrote in post #16400813 (external link)
thanks...but i know what an extension tube is...and i still don't see the point for people, as the focus that you're able to achieve is reduced a ton...so he'd only be able to probably focus out 5ft away...

it would be fine if he was taking macro shots, but i haven't seen where he said that

whoops: now i see it :)

:) Sorry, I was just clarifying - I don't know what knowledge you have, and I try to help when I can

He may not be doing portraits in the studio - I would say 90% of the work I do in the studio at work is products on a light table, and I use the 50mm f2.5 "macro" lens or 24-70L

As for a good lens for sports - it depends on what sports.

For basketball and netball I use 24-70 and 70-200.
I have no experience with the 24-105 but being f4 it may focus a bit too slow for indoor sports.


My Best Imageswww.echo63.deviantart.​com (external link)
Gear listhttps://photography-on-the.net …p?p=2463426&pos​tcount=385

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jonathanheierle
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
714 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 171
Joined Aug 2013
Location: Eastern Oregon
     
Oct 26, 2013 11:59 |  #13

Echo63 wrote in post #16400822 (external link)
:) Sorry, I was just clarifying - I don't know what knowledge you have, and I try to help when I can

He may not be doing portraits in the studio - I would say 90% of the work I do in the studio at work is products on a light table, and I use the 50mm f2.5 "macro" lens or 24-70L

As for a good lens for sports - it depends on what sports.

For basketball and netball I use 24-70 and 70-200.
I have no experience with the 24-105 but being f4 it may focus a bit too slow for indoor sports.

it would be 90% out door sports and for the studio probably %75 for the time would be non portraits ill be shooting misc products, flowers and bicycles


Canon EOS R5, RF 15-35 f/2.8, RF 70-200 f/2.8, RF 50mm f/1.2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Echo63
Goldmember
Avatar
2,868 posts
Likes: 169
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Perth - Western Australia - Earth
     
Oct 26, 2013 12:11 |  #14

jonathanheierle wrote in post #16400884 (external link)
it would be 90% out door sports and for the studio probably %75 for the time would be non portraits ill be shooting misc products, flowers and bicycles

I don't think I have ever shot outdoor sports with anything wider than a 70-200 (except Motorsport)
Outdoors the 24-105 will probaly be ok


My Best Imageswww.echo63.deviantart.​com (external link)
Gear listhttps://photography-on-the.net …p?p=2463426&pos​tcount=385

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,550 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Best lens for Studio work AND sports?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
1997 guests, 116 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.