I really appreciate good black and white work. However, almost all of the B&W images I like fall far outside of my genre, which is wildlife photography.
Shooting effective black & white images of wild animals in their natural surroundings is especially difficult for one primary reason: most animals and birds are colored so as to blend in to the surrounding habitat. So, for most wildlife, I could not rely on contrast between the subject's natural tone and that of it's surroundings, because the two are usually very similar. So, to make effective B&W images of my subjects, I would have to look for - and wait for - anomalies of light. This can be done, and can result in some fantastic imagery, but several days might pass by before such an anomaly occurs (with a cooperative, nearby subject). I'm not saying that this can't be done, but it would be hard to shoot prolifically if one is only doing B&W with wild subjects.
So, I'll stick to my color work for my own shooting, but I will certainly spend time online viewing and appreciating excellent B&W work, especially that which is in genres which I do not shoot, such as still life, street, and landscape photography.
"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "moot point", NOT "mute point".