Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 07 Nov 2013 (Thursday) 19:52
Search threadPrev/next
POLL: "Is the Red Ring worth paying the extra price?"
Yes
263
84%
No
50
16%

313 voters, 313 votes given (1 choice only choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Is the Red ring worth it?

 
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
16,063 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 6152
Joined Sep 2007
     
Nov 07, 2013 23:21 |  #31

some are, some aren't.


Sony A7riii/A9 - FE 12-24/4 - FE 24-240 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 28/2 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - EF 135/1.8 Art - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Astro Rok 14/2.8 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 RXD, 70-200/2.8 VC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
18,158 posts
Gallery: 45 photos
Likes: 2468
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
     
Nov 07, 2013 23:28 as a reply to  @ post 16433688 |  #32

looking at comparisons all over the internet, i think in the case of the two pairs of lenses you are asking about the L's aren't the winners...but of course others will say they are...but it is a comparison of older L's vs. newer lenses


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tat3406
Senior Member
Avatar
275 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2013
     
Nov 08, 2013 00:09 |  #33

I think Canon have some very low price L that very nice, the price is only little expensive than competitive lens:
70-200F4 L
17-40F4 L
100 L macro
135L


6D, 100L,24-70 F4L, 40mm pancake, 70-300L
Carl Zeiss MP 50
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/tat3406/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sirrith
Cream of the Crop
10,545 posts
Gallery: 50 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 36
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Hong Kong
     
Nov 08, 2013 00:15 |  #34

No, it depends entirely on the lens itself.


-Tom
Flickr (external link)
F-Stop Guru review | RRS BH-40 review

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thepilgrimsdream
Member
100 posts
Joined Jul 2013
Location: Philadelphia
     
Nov 08, 2013 00:28 as a reply to  @ Sirrith's post |  #35

First of all, my 85L ii has magic that zeiss and sigma may have come close to, but don't have the autofocus to give the consistency. The 135L is another unmatched lens for ef mount cameras. I would buy the 35L over the sigma, but only cause I would want it to render similar to my other lenses. My 17-40L is also a fantastic piece of glass considering the price point.

I ditched my non-L lenses because I found I had to boost the contrast vibrance and sharpness to try to match my non-L files to my L's. it's okay in Lightroom, but a pain when you shoot dslr video.

I am excited and have been keeping my eye on sigma, if they really get their AF nailed down, they might start producing some real gems at a great price point


6d, 5d Mark 2, 135L, 85L II, 17-40L, 85 1.8
http://www.danielfaehl​photo.com/ (external link)
Philadelphia / Bucks County Photography - Willing to Travel

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ilovetheleafs
Raising uninteresting to new levels
907 posts
Gallery: 20 photos
Likes: 30
Joined Jul 2011
     
Nov 08, 2013 01:11 |  #36

I go with no. L's are some great options and there are a few that I would consider buying, however, if there is a lens that fits my needs above a canon offering I will get that, if Canon has an offering that fits my needs better I will go with that.


Canon Rebel XS gripped, Canon 18 - 55mm, Sigma 18 - 200mm f3.5 - f6.3 DC OS HSM,Sigma 50mm f1.4 Olympus TG-810 Tough, LowePro Classified 160AW, Canon 430EX II Flash, Kata E-702

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kanye
Senior Member
Avatar
670 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2013
Location: Seattle, WA
     
Nov 08, 2013 02:05 |  #37

My L from 1989 works like butter.

Glass is flawless, everything works.

Takes awesome pics.

Yes. Worth it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dscri001
Senior Member
487 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 105
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Virginia Beach, Virgina
     
Nov 08, 2013 02:15 |  #38

I'd vote yes. Totally worth it. Now I may not have had as many as some of the others but they have all been 99.999% incredible. The extra 0.001% comes from lack of experience. L doesn't necessarily mean sharpest lens. You have to take into account contrast (detail?) and color rendition. I had a tamron 10-24 that was amazingly sharp, but lacked contrast and rendered colors a bit warm. It seems that the 2 70-200's and the 17-40 I've had, I never hesitate to shoot at any aperture or worry about missing focus (besides user error). That kind of accountability is what makes them worth it. Especially with the superteles. Shot with a 400 stacked on a 1.4 and it was just an absolute pleasure to shoot with.


-Tyler I II
EOS 6DII, EF 16-35mm f/4 ISL, EF 35 f/1.4L II, EF 85 f/1.8, EF 70-200mm f/2.8L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
titi_67207
Senior Member
Avatar
496 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Strasbourg, France
     
Nov 08, 2013 03:20 |  #39

Yes, but if your wallet is not too full, it's a good idea to have the best L lens(es) on your favorite focal length(es), and to complete with other Canon non-L or third-party lenses.

Titi


Canon 5D MkII + Sony A7 + 24x36 & 6x6 B&W film cameras .
CV 15 4.5 III | TS-E 24L II | FE 28 2 | (50+85) 1.4 | 135 2 | 70-200 4.0L | a collection of old Zuikos + FD + Adaptall + AI-s + M42

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nick_Reading.UK
Senior Member
Avatar
836 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2011
Location: Reading, Berkshire, UK
     
Nov 08, 2013 03:30 |  #40

jjaenagle wrote in post #16433373 (external link)
RE: Your gear list.... wow!

Yes, WoW !!!!!!!!!!! :cool:


EOS 5Dmk3 X2, 60D, EF24-70mm f2.8L mk2, EF70-200mm f2.8L IS mk2, EF85mm f1.8, EF50mm f1.4, EF50mm f1.8 mk1(350D with 18-55mm Sh"kit" lens).
Speedlite 600EX-RT, 430EX II Flash. manfrotto 190XDB tripod, Giottos GTMML 3290B Monopod, B+W 77mm 110 Single Coated filter, Hama 77mm Variable Neutral Density Filter.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Thorrulz
Goldmember
Avatar
3,778 posts
Gallery: 20 photos
Likes: 389
Joined Jan 2009
Location: The Land of the "Go Big Red!"
     
Nov 08, 2013 04:16 |  #41

Of course the Canon L lens are worth it. While there are times and situations that a non L can deliver simular results, an L lens really shines when it's used as it was designed for. I won't even weigh in on third party lens as I wouldn't touch one. To many inconsistencies in their manufacturing process to deliver the reliability I demand in my gear.


Flickr (external link)
D800 I Nikon 200 f2 VR 1 I Nikon 200 f2 ED AI-S I Nikon 135 f2 DC I Nikon 28-70 f/2.8 I Nikon 50 f/1.4G I Nikon 85 f/1.8G I Pentax 645D I SMC FA 645 75 F2.8 I SMC FA 645 45-85 F4.5 I SMC FA 645 200 F4
My sister, the professional baker and cake decorator once told me that my camera takes great pics. My reply was that I thought her oven baked great cakes.:lol:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Asroma
Member
121 posts
Joined Oct 2012
Location: Singapore
     
Nov 08, 2013 04:58 |  #42

I love My L Lens.


Gear list| Canon 5d mk ii, Canon 40D 17-40 F4 L, 35 1.4 L, 85 1.8, 100 macro 2.8, 135 F2 L, 70-200 F4, 580 EX II
My Flickr at http://www.flickr.com/​photos/56983240@N03/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bratkinson
Senior Member
643 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Western MA
     
Nov 08, 2013 06:21 |  #43

Back about 1975, shortly after I switched from Minolta to Canon, I bought a non-Canon lens to add to my AE-1 with 50mm lens. I saved some money on the deal. The lens was less than sharp. I found out later that that brand was mostly junk. The fact that they're still in business today making compatible lenses surprises me, given the junk back then.

I've had nothing but Canon equipment since, and all my lenses today have red rings. Well worth the money, too.


"Never tell people how to do things. Tell them what to do and they will surprise you with their ingenuity." General George S Patton, Jr 1885-1945

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sibil
Cream of the Crop
9,275 posts
Likes: 41962
Joined Jan 2009
Location: SoCal
     
Nov 08, 2013 06:35 as a reply to  @ bratkinson's post |  #44

Yes and no, depending on the lens.
When I get the fever for an L lens, one look at this thread and it cures the fever.
Post your best pics made with a cheap lens
https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1324375
It always encourages me to be a better photographer and not always look for an L lens for better pictures.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sjones
Goldmember
Avatar
2,224 posts
Likes: 187
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Chicago
     
Nov 08, 2013 06:42 as a reply to  @ bratkinson's post |  #45

I generally don't dive into the "gear" section to make this point, since, after all, this is the gear section. But given some of the statements made, it might be good to reiterate that it all depends on the photographer's needs, style, or simple wants.

You might not need an expensive lens, but if you have the financial means to buy one, and that purchase brings some pleasure, then go forth and consume.

However, the importance of of durability is going to vary among different users, and the matter of 'sharpness' is actually more subjective than many folks realize.

Moreover, buy all you want, but having the best does not guarantee improvement. Boring photos will remain boring. On the other hand, if you shoot lowlight stuff, such as at a gymnasium, then getting a faster lens can possibly help overcome some of the technical issues involved with a slower lens. Yet even in this case, a boring photo, even with less noise and such, is still going to be boring.

The one psychological area where buying different gear can possibly be beneficial, and I have no proof of this, is that if you enjoy your new gear more, you are likely to use it more. And again, while not guaranteed, increased use can help improve one's photography. Also, "different gear" doesn't necessarily mean better or more expensive; maybe you discovered that you enjoy using that Holga more than your DSLR.


Sept 2017-July 2018 (external link)
Manual Focus; only for street photography amateurs...
It's the Photographer (external link) | God Loves Photoshop (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

17,296 views & 0 likes for this thread
Is the Red ring worth it?
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is wooricoin
957 guests, 265 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.