Siggy 35 1.4. My new best friend. The burger was at 1.4 and the other at 3.2.
JakAHearts Cream of the Crop  More info | Dec 29, 2013 11:15 | #556 Siggy 35 1.4. My new best friend. The burger was at 1.4 and the other at 3.2. Shane
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 29, 2013 11:19 | #557 70D ISO 6400 - my colleague´s daughter  Image hosted by forum (672314) © palad1n [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Website (online) : www.lukaskrasa.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Voaky999 Goldmember  More info | Dec 29, 2013 11:50 | #558 Don
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cbkoontz Member 97 posts Likes: 3 Joined Oct 2012 Location: Seattle, WA More info | 60D ISO 4000   IMG_0526 by cbkoontz, on Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
EverydayGetaway Cream of the Crop  More info | Dec 29, 2013 21:18 | #560 ISO 8000 on the 6D, NR around 10 for luminance in LR4  IMG_0218-2.jpg by EverydayGetaway, on FlickrFuji X-T3 // Fuji X-Pro2 (Full Spectrum) // Fuji X-H1 // Fuji X-T1
LOG IN TO REPLY |
idsurfer Cream of the Crop  More info | Jan 01, 2014 09:21 | #561 This looks awesome...nice photo as well. What run? cbkoontz wrote in post #16562933 60D ISO 4000 IMG_0526 by cbkoontz, on FlickrCory
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jrandall Junior Member 26 posts Joined Jun 2012 Location: Seacoast NH, USA More info | ISO 4000, 60D w- 100-400L @ 400mm, 100% crop.  60D gripped | 10-22 | 50 1.8 II | 100-400L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 01, 2014 09:46 | #563 jrandall wrote in post #16568934 ISO 4000, 60D w- 100-400L @ 400mm, 100% crop. I've worked on this a lot, it is literally the first image I've ever denoised. I'd like it to be as nice as possible, so any C/C is greatly appreciated! Thanks for looking. Without seeing the original RAW, it's hard to tell. To me it seems over NR'd, as the details appear soft, almost 'melted'. Gerry
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BillBoehme Enjoy being spanked  More info | Jan 01, 2014 14:54 | #564 MakisM1 wrote in post #16568973 Without seeing the original RAW, it's hard to tell. To me it seems over NR'd, as the details appear soft, almost 'melted'. It takes a while to get your bearings and start sensing what is 'too much'. The too little is easy, you still see noise. I would suggest, if I may, to shoot both RAW and JPEG at the same time. Use standard NR on the JPEG, the 60D in-camera NR is pretty decent. Then try to establish a workflow that can match or exceed the results of the JPEG. It's not easy, but eventually you 'll get there. It took me the better part of a year to match the internal JPEG NR in the 60D. If you have any questions, I'll be happy to answer them in a PM, so we don't derail the thread.. EDIT: I don't mean to sound discouraging. It is a good effort for a first attempt!  Bird photography is probably more demanding than any other category of photography when it comes to preserving details -- it is better to have some noise than to smooth out some of the feather details. Even with the noise filtering, I would say that the snowy owl image is a wall hanger. Personally, I feel that the noise filtering in ACR/LR and DPP soften details too much for bird images (OK, for some other types of photography) so I have been using Neat Image and might give some of the other like Noise Ninja and Topaz De Noise a try. Overall, I am fairly satisfied with Neat Image (I use the Photoshop plug-in version).  Atmospheric haze in images? Click for Tutorial to Reduce Atmospheric Haze with Photoshop.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SylvesterPotter Senior Member 673 posts Likes: 27 Joined Jan 2012 More info | Jan 01, 2014 14:57 | #565 ISO 4000 the first 2 I actually added a bit more grain because I like it...the last one is what ISO 4000 looks like on the 5D MKiii  SYL_0171 by Sylvester Potter, on Flickr
SYL_0166 by Sylvester Potter, on Flickr SYL_0177 - Version 2 by Sylvester Potter, on Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Scatterbrained Cream of the Crop  8,511 posts Gallery: 267 photos Best ofs: 12 Likes: 4606 Joined Jan 2010 Location: Yomitan, Okinawa, Japan More info | Jan 01, 2014 15:05 | #566 iso 3200  Encountering an Old Colleague by tltichy, on FlickrVanillaImaging.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jrandall Junior Member 26 posts Joined Jun 2012 Location: Seacoast NH, USA More info | Jan 01, 2014 16:13 | #567 MakisM1 wrote in post #16568973 Without seeing the original RAW, it's hard to tell. To me it seems over NR'd, as the details appear soft, almost 'melted'. It takes a while to get your bearings and start sensing what is 'too much'. The too little is easy, you still see noise. I would suggest, if I may, to shoot both RAW and JPEG at the same time. Use standard NR on the JPEG, the 60D in-camera NR is pretty decent. Then try to establish a workflow that can match or exceed the results of the JPEG. It's not easy, but eventually you 'll get there. It took me the better part of a year to match the internal JPEG NR in the 60D. If you have any questions, I'll be happy to answer them in a PM, so we don't derail the thread.. EDIT: I don't mean to sound discouraging. It is a good effort for a first attempt! Bill Boehme wrote in post #16569733 Bird photography is probably more demanding than any other category of photography when it comes to preserving details -- it is better to have some noise than to smooth out some of the feather details. Even with the noise filtering, I would say that the snowy owl image is a wall hanger. Personally, I feel that the noise filtering in ACR/LR and DPP soften details too much for bird images (OK, for some other types of photography) so I have been using Neat Image and might give some of the other like Noise Ninja and Topaz De Noise a try. Overall, I am fairly satisfied with Neat Image (I use the Photoshop plug-in version). BTW, some camera models now allow in-camera JPG creation after the fact which AFAIK is identical to RAW+JPG. Here is an ISO 3200 image made with my 7D of a barn swallow where noise is still quite visible -- but there really is nothing wrong with noise as long as a decent image is captured. Noise has always been a part of photograph. Thank you both, I appreciate the feedback. Definitely not discouraging! I don't want to derail the thread but I do want to put in a short reply just to clarify how heavily cropped the Snowy Owl image is. The whole bird easily fits in a box 750x550 pixels, or barely 2% of the frame. So I totally agree it lacks detail, but I think that's mostly because there weren't a whole lot of pixels to start with. 60D gripped | 10-22 | 50 1.8 II | 100-400L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
EverydayGetaway Cream of the Crop More info | Jan 01, 2014 16:16 | #568 Scatterbrained wrote in post #16569751 iso 3200 Encountering an Old Colleague by tltichy, on FlickrAwesome! I love Indy Jones! Fuji X-T3 // Fuji X-Pro2 (Full Spectrum) // Fuji X-H1 // Fuji X-T1
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 01, 2014 16:48 | #569 Well, since we are at it, here is one attempt with mild NR and some sharpening.  Image hosted by forum (672593) © MakisM1 [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. As I mentioned in my PM, reducing the size of the photo (if it weren't sych a heavy crop) reduces noise without NR. This is a 500x500 without NR, just sharpening  Image hosted by forum (672592) © MakisM1 [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. A WORD OF CAUTION:If you look at the images at a magnification of over 100% you will be seeing artifacts that your viewer creates. For my HD monitor (roughly 2000 pixels in the horizontal) the upper photo should be half the monitor in size and the lower a quarter. I normally have some magnification on the browser for my tired eyes (150%) Gerry
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sansational Reverse Psychologist  More info | Jan 01, 2014 17:06 | #570 Canon 5D2  Devin by andrewjsan, on Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Miss Understood 376 guests, 147 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
