Around the same time Canon releases a new 50 1.4.
Oct 02, 2013 13:03 | #16 Around the same time Canon releases a new 50 1.4. http://www.colorblindedphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Osiriz Senior Member  622 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2012 Location: Norway More info | Oct 02, 2013 13:25 | #17 Colorblinded wrote in post #16341086  Around the same time Canon releases a new 50 1.4. Why would they wait for Canon?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
photographyByEvangelos Goldmember  1,167 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2003 Location: Florida, USA More info | Oct 27, 2013 01:37 | #18 Had the Sigma 50 1.4 it was not that great in terms of AF performance corners not that great so lets hope they have done their homework with new "Art" 50MM they will be producing. The currant one is not a bad 50MM but its not great either so what the point? Just buy the Canon 50MM 1.4 since no slouch plus the AF is 100X better that the currant Sigma offering. I am sure the new 50 A lens will be a good performer seems Sigma has really taken their share of the market quite seriously and they will put a dent into Canon & Nikon's market hold if the keep up Sigma 35 1.4 A lens type of quality.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sirrith Cream of the Crop More info | Oct 28, 2013 06:11 | #19 photography By Evangelos wrote in post #16402227 Just buy the Canon 50MM 1.4 since no slouch plus the AF is 100X better that the currant Sigma offering. I had the Canon 50/1.4 and I disagree. The AF was rather inconsistent, the lens was soft wide open with lots of CA, the build was sub-par, and the AF motor is known for dying (which is worse than needing calibration). -Tom
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheAnt Goldmember More info | Jan 06, 2014 15:30 | #20 Looks like pretty soon.... R6, 6D EF 24-70 MkI - TS-E 90mm 2.8 - EF 85mm 1.8 - Σ 50mm 1.4 - Σ 15mm 2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 06, 2014 16:00 | #21  Permanent bangood, the original 50 was quite bad in my opinion. very unstable results.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 06, 2014 21:24 | #22 Now it's Canon's turn! http://www.colorblindedphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
lomenak Senior Member 649 posts Likes: 15 Joined Jan 2011 Location: Auckland, New Zealand More info | Jan 06, 2014 21:25 | #23 nekrosoft13 wrote in post #16583002 good, the original 50 was quite bad in my opinion. very unstable results. Yeah there has been a lot of bad feedback on the internet regarding the Sigmalux, but as with everything, people tend to complain more than praise. I was really happy with my copy and was sad to see it go. I may be looking into getting this one when it is out.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 06, 2014 23:02 | #25 http://www.sigmaphoto.com/lenses/standard Feed back #1#2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
boerewors Goldmember  1,948 posts Likes: 4 Joined Sep 2009 Location: South African living in Indonesia More info | Jan 17, 2014 01:09 | #27 http://www.canonrumors.com …t-lens-should-be-amazing/ The most important piece of gear you own, resides in your head and its called your brain.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 17, 2014 01:36 | #28 <insert shut up and take my money gif> Retouching
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 17, 2014 08:01 | #29 Getting close to the resolution of the Otus would be very impressive but, build quality needs to be there as well. The problem for Sigma will be price point. It will be a tough sell if it goes for more than a 50 f/1.2L. Considering how often I use my 50, I'd have a tough time going over about $600.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 17, 2014 14:55 | #30 |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is griggt 2033 guests, 115 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
