Yah that has good reviews too.
vinmunoz Cream of the Crop ![]() More info | Jan 15, 2014 03:40 | #7757 video with 5D3 is very clean even at H16000 ISO. editing was cutting and trimming only. no noise reduction. | VINZ - SONY A7RIV/A73//A6000/FDR-X3000 | Sigma105 | FE1635F4 } Tamron 17-28 Tamron 28-75 | FE50F1.8 | SEL30mm F3.5 Macro |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 15, 2014 07:14 | #7758 I think I am going to lie low for a few months... Then whichever has the best report card... Sigma 50 1.4 Art, Canon 50 f? IS I am not sure about an 85. One of them for my birthday in September... Gerry
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CJCMarquez Cream of the Crop ![]() More info | Jan 15, 2014 07:18 | #7759 Hey I've had some of the girls ask for prints. What lab do you typically use for client prints? Chad or CJ
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pauly916 Goldmember ![]() 1,523 posts Likes: 12 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Poole, uk More info | Jan 15, 2014 08:27 | #7760 CJCMarquez wrote in post #16607193 ![]() Hey I've had some of the girls ask for prints. What lab do you typically use for client prints? Cool stuff I'm not surprised you nailed that shoot Gear- who cares?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vinmunoz Cream of the Crop ![]() More info | Jan 15, 2014 08:27 | #7761 for normal prints, i just do it in costco. i usually download their printer color profiles but then i found out that sRGB are just as good so i am printing with sRGB profile since. | VINZ - SONY A7RIV/A73//A6000/FDR-X3000 | Sigma105 | FE1635F4 } Tamron 17-28 Tamron 28-75 | FE50F1.8 | SEL30mm F3.5 Macro |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CJCMarquez Cream of the Crop ![]() More info | Jan 15, 2014 08:33 | #7762 Thanks Pauly. Chad or CJ
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 15, 2014 08:37 | #7763 CJCMarquez wrote in post #16607371 ![]() Thanks Pauly. I've used Costco before which I was pretty happy about but I don't have a membership (used my sister's before) so I'm trying to look for something more accessible. Hi CJ, ~Steve~ | 60D | S95 | 10-22 | 15-85 | 55-250 | 60 | 50/1.8 I
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 15, 2014 09:48 | #7764 Software issues are hampering work. So, I have time to edit. ![]() IMG_6881 ![]() ![]() IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/photos/str0ntium/11966384186/ ![]() IMG_6879 ![]() ![]() IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/photos/str0ntium/11965969234/ ![]() IMG_6872 ![]() ![]()
LOG IN TO REPLY |
NewCreation Goldmember ![]() More info | Jan 15, 2014 11:23 | #7765 CJCMarquez wrote in post #16607193 ![]() Hey I've had some of the girls ask for prints. What lab do you typically use for client prints? I like mpixpro or mpix. They offer drop shipping which is really nice. Their fuji pearl is awesome for portraits. Good customer service and prices. My name is Brenda ~Saved by grace, walking by faith
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 15, 2014 11:44 | #7766 NewCreation wrote in post #16607821 ![]() I like mpixpro or mpix. They offer drop shipping which is really nice. Their fuji pearl is awesome for portraits. Good customer service and prices. Most pro labs do this and it is a nice feature for you pros. I will also vouch for the quality of the Pearl paper. We had two nice portrait photos damaged during our move from NYC (they dropped the pallet while in storage and broke a whole bunch of things, including the glass and frame of every photo in that pallet. The broken glass scratched the photos in many places). I scanned the photos, cloned/healed the scratches and ordered prints mounted on thin foamcore (so that they don't warp once mounted into frames with matting). They came back better than the (VERY expensive) originals. Gerry
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CJCMarquez Cream of the Crop ![]() More info | Jan 15, 2014 11:45 | #7767 That was the site! I signed up with Bay photo last night so I may try them. Chad or CJ
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 15, 2014 11:56 | #7768 On another subject, I think I got a lens for free... The 3:2 sample of the same photo has more vertical content and less horizontal FOV around 11 mm with the second crop. Gerry
LOG IN TO REPLY |
NewCreation Goldmember ![]() More info | Jan 15, 2014 12:00 | #7769 Gerry, I must need a lenses-for-dummies tutorial because when I read your discussion about wide lenses I get really lost. lol The more I learn, I realize how little I know. :/ My name is Brenda ~Saved by grace, walking by faith
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 15, 2014 12:30 | #7770 Sorry Brenda, I got a bit excited, so I skipped a bunch. So, basically, I can crop the FF photo and get a usable photo. The Focal Length does not change (the lens doesn't really know what is behind it (FF sensor or Crop sensor) so I get an 8 mm non-Fisheye lens. Actually an 8-16 non-fisheye (or rectilinear) lens... However, since I have to crop out the vignette, I end up with a smaller field of view, which actually corresponds to the field of view of a 12 mm (FOV=angle from the far left ot the far right of the photo). But with the 8 mm perspective (since I haven't changed the relative distance of subjects and their distance to the camera). Is this explanation any better? EDIT: The reason I am thrilled is that Canon makes a 8-15 L for $1500 and it is a fisheye... I don't care about fisheyes... I get it for 'free'... I have to experiment a bit to see what are the drawbacks, I suspect that the sharpness in the corners may suffer a bit, until I crop to the equivalent of the crop sensor Gerry
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
Latest registered member is umeiri 894 guests, 205 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |