Did this a week ago...CC pls
IMAGE LINK: http://s919.photobucket.com …2503_zps655fb384.jpg.html
IMAGE LINK: http://s919.photobucket.com …2692_zpsc53bc9c3.jpg.html
IMAGE LINK: http://s919.photobucket.com …2400_zpsda71006c.jpg.html
surgeonhawkeye Goldmember More info | Jan 23, 2014 14:04 | #1 Did this a week ago...CC pls IMAGE LINK: http://s919.photobucket.com …2503_zps655fb384.jpg.html IMAGE LINK: http://s919.photobucket.com …2692_zpsc53bc9c3.jpg.html IMAGE LINK: http://s919.photobucket.com …2400_zpsda71006c.jpg.html I love this
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gonzogolf dumb remark memorialized More info | Jan 23, 2014 14:09 | #2 A couple of issues. Your subjects are too close to your background and the background is wrinkled. When you are using a white background this really jumps out at you. Your white balance is inconsistent from photo to photo, and for the most part doesnt seem to be that accurate, again this stands out on the white backdrop. Looking at the first shot it seems like you might have a color conflict between two light sources as the left side of the image is more orange than the right. What lighting equipment were you using.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 23, 2014 17:31 | #3 ^ This is right on. White balance is both incorrect and inconsistent across the series. Backdrop looks cheap because of the obvious wrinkles and degrades the pictures. Would have been much better off just taking these pics at a local park. Laurence
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 24, 2014 05:47 | #4 In #2, the visual weight is unbalanced. Too much of Ma & Pa, and not enough of the kiddos - it's like they are afterthoughts instead of joining the image. And I'm not a fan of the crotch shot of the male. And I'd remove the black watch since it's too much a contrast with the blue and white theme. X100T XT3
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 24, 2014 07:29 | #5 In number 1 the light camera right is to far forward, it is putting some harsh lighting on the end models face that is inconsistent with the rest of the lighting. I kept making the same mistake myself, during the shoot is is easier to get the subjects to move a little forward to correct the lighting. I try to make art by pushing buttons
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 24, 2014 16:29 | #6 Thanks for your accurate CC. I love this
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 24, 2014 16:36 | #7 GlimmerMan wrote in post #16632186 In #2, the visual weight is unbalanced. Too much of Ma & Pa, and not enough of the kiddos - it's like they are afterthoughts instead of joining the image. And I'm not a fan of the crotch shot of the male. And I'd remove the black watch since it's too much a contrast with the blue and white theme. Looks like a fun shoot, though. I didnt even notice the watch until now.... I love this
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 24, 2014 19:03 | #8 Lovely family. I assume you have a house light camera left. It's giving you that yellowish tint unfortunately. So, if you want better consistency, you'll have to gel the flashes, or use a high enough shutter speed to kill all ambient light
LOG IN TO REPLY |
HappySnapper90 Cream of the Crop 5,145 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2008 Location: Cleveland, Ohio More info | Jan 26, 2014 10:39 | #9 The issue here seems to clearly be the lighting used. Seems too harsh from the front. #1 has the best flash, but the others are just too much. Just look at the woman's facial color tone from #1 to #2.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
fashionrider Goldmember 1,093 posts Likes: 22 Joined Dec 2011 More info | Jan 26, 2014 11:40 | #10 With photo #1, it's obvious you wanted them all to do the same pose. If you're going to do that, make sure their hands are also the same. Mom has it right over left, the 2 girls have it left over right. Gear List (5D3, 70-200 f2.8L IS II, Sigma 85mm f1.4, Sigma 35mm f1.4, 50 f1.8, 24-105L, Alien Bee lights, etc etc)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 29, 2014 17:19 | #11 good point on the hands I love this
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is griggt 1394 guests, 123 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||