EOS5DC Senior Member 791 posts Joined Dec 2013 More info | Feb 12, 2014 05:17 | #16  Permanent banSame shots. Extreme upper left corner. First is Tamron 28-75 at f/2.8. Second is 35 IS at f/2. I still think the Tamron holds its own. Remember, this is a wide-open extreme corner. I would not pay $1,000 for the difference between these shots.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. Bodies: 60D, 6D.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kenwood33 Goldmember 2,616 posts Likes: 26 Joined Jul 2005 More info | Feb 12, 2014 07:21 | #17 since you don't need IS, i would go for the canon v1, because of better build and faster focusing
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Shooting Goldmember  1,552 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jan 2008 More info | Aug 04, 2014 18:52 | #18 I am very disappointed in my version 1 24-70 2.8. My 17-55 kit lens is sharper than the 24-70. I tried micro adjustments and nothing changes. Shot a wedding Saturday and eventually put the 24-70 back in the back and finished with the 17-55. Version 2 costs way to much money so I'm basically stuck. Can't afford to send it back to Canon to be adjusted ;(
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
| Latest registered member is muntasiraonik 741 guests, 251 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
