for travel
10-22
15-85
70-200
Feb 19, 2014 11:22 | #16 |
Feb 19, 2014 11:24 | #17 TeamSpeed wrote in post #16701495 If the budget permits, try finding the STM version. Around $200 USD from various sources, and worth it over the previous 2 versions, I believe. Not sure about what that might run to purchase/ship to Canada though. Maybe pick one up or have one shipped to a hotel room in the US as you pass through? no issue with shipping as i will be going to L.A. for 2 weeks to get most of the stuffs organized before going to Alaska. As we all know, Canada is an expensive place to buy U.S. goods.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 19, 2014 11:26 | #18 lens pirate wrote in post #16701532 I would ditch the DSLR altogether. Get a handful of capable little point and shoots with superzooms. You should be able to get a small bag full with extra batteries and chargers for less money and less WEIGHT than a DSLR. lens pirate i'm not parting ways with my DSLR because my wife will bring her OM-D already
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ceegee Goldmember 2,335 posts Likes: 34 Joined Mar 2008 Location: Montreal, Quebec More info | Feb 19, 2014 11:26 | #19 My suggestion would be to keep your 10-22 and 28-75, add a longer zoom (55-250 or 70-200 f4 IS if you can manage it), and buy a good point-and-shoot. Gear: Canon R10, Canon RFS 18-150, Canon RF 100-400
LOG IN TO REPLY |
EverydayGetaway Cream of the Crop More info | Feb 19, 2014 11:28 | #20 I'd leave the DSLR at home and buy the new G1X2 or a mirrorless system. Much smaller and lighter with IQ that matches or beats your DSLR. Oh, and it'll likely cost you less than buying more lenses Fuji X-T3 // Fuji X-Pro2 (Full Spectrum) // Fuji X-H1 // Fuji X-T1
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 19, 2014 11:34 | #21 EverydayGetaway wrote in post #16701562 I'd leave the DSLR at home and buy the new G1X2 or a mirrorless system. Much smaller and lighter with IQ that matches or beats your DSLR. Oh, and it'll likely cost you less than buying more lenses ![]() my wife has an Oly E-M5 that she'll be bringing along.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
EverydayGetaway Cream of the Crop More info | Feb 19, 2014 11:37 | #22 pokerface wrote in post #16701579 my wife has an Oly E-M5 that she'll be bringing along. Why not just pickup more glass for that then? That'd be much more simple than packing along a bulky and heavy DSLR kit imo. I traveled Germany by foot, train and bike for 3 months with a 20D and Tamron 18-270mm and even that was pushing it for comfort. Fuji X-T3 // Fuji X-Pro2 (Full Spectrum) // Fuji X-H1 // Fuji X-T1
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 19, 2014 11:41 | #23 I suggest travelling light. Several outfits come to mind: Canon 80D, 60D, Canon 10-22EFs, 15-85EFS IS, Sigma 100-400, Sigma 135/1.8ART, Sigma 30mm f/1.4DC, Canon 60mm EFs Macro, Rokinon 8mm fisheye, 550EX flash, Olympus TG6 underwater P&S
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 19, 2014 11:42 | #24 EverydayGetaway wrote in post #16701587 Why not just pickup more glass for that then? That'd be much more simple than packing along a bulky and heavy DSLR kit imo. I traveled Germany by foot, train and bike for 3 months with a 20D and Tamron 18-270mm and even that was pushing it for comfort. because that's hers. we wont be together every time I want to take a picture of something. Also, once in Mexico City, she'll be flying to Cancun and i'll ride my way there.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
EverydayGetaway Cream of the Crop More info | Feb 19, 2014 11:45 | #25 pokerface wrote in post #16701596 because that's hers. we wont be together every time I want to take a picture of something. In that case, why not pick up a second em5 or a PEN? That way you could share lenses and further save room/weight. Fuji X-T3 // Fuji X-Pro2 (Full Spectrum) // Fuji X-H1 // Fuji X-T1
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Scrumhalf Cream of the Crop More info | Feb 19, 2014 11:52 | #26 Get a fast prime for sure. I suspect you'll have opportunities to take great shots in less than ideal light. Sam
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeamSpeed 01010100 01010011 More info | Isn't it funny? You say you are staying with a DSLR, and so many are adamant that you go pick up a smaller camera. Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 19, 2014 12:12 | #28 Exactly Teamspeed. A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vengence Goldmember 2,103 posts Likes: 108 Joined Mar 2013 More info | Feb 19, 2014 12:38 | #29 I would me much more concerned about total volume/size and weight than number or lenses.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 19, 2014 13:07 | #30 10-22 + 18-135 or even 18-250 sigma, and a light tripod. You dont want all that weight if you're going to bike. Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is griggt 621 guests, 124 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||