Tareq wrote in post #16726430
Maybe someone should start a thread asking about which 3 or 4 lenses only to have.
Maybe someone should start a thread asking about which 3 or 4 lenses only to have.
Here you go!
jimewall Goldmember 1,871 posts Likes: 11 Joined May 2008 Location: Cleveland, Ohio More info | Mar 01, 2014 17:30 | #136 Tareq wrote in post #16726430 Maybe someone should start a thread asking about which 3 or 4 lenses only to have. Here you go! Thanks for Reading & Good Luck - Jim
LOG IN TO REPLY |
17-40 and the 100L 2.8 macro I can cover a lot of situations with that combo "Vision is the art of seeing that which is invisible"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tareq "I am very lazy, a normal consumer"  More info | Mar 02, 2014 04:07 | #138 Cool, it is there long long time ago and i didn't know, thank you very much! Galleries:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jimewall Goldmember 1,871 posts Likes: 11 Joined May 2008 Location: Cleveland, Ohio More info | You are welcome! I also see you added already - nice. Thanks for Reading & Good Luck - Jim
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tareq "I am very lazy, a normal consumer" More info | Mar 02, 2014 07:50 | #140 jimewall wrote in post #16728322 You are welcome! I also see you added already - nice. Sure, i wouldn't miss it without my post there Galleries:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ctwatkins Senior Member  529 posts Likes: 12 Joined Dec 2011 Location: Bluegrass State More info | Mar 02, 2014 08:26 | #141 ziemowit wrote in post #16726801 35L + 70-200L IS I could live with this . . . providing it is the 70-200 IS II . . . Gear: 5D MKIII * 6D * 35L (1.4) * 135L (2.0) * 24 - 70L (2.8II) * 70 - 200L (2.8ISII) * 200L (2.0IS) * 580 EX * Induro CT213 * PCB AB B800 (X3) * Pocketwizard Plus
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Winwin Senior Member 702 posts Likes: 3 Joined Mar 2011 Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada More info | Mar 02, 2014 11:20 | #142 24L or 16-35, 50L Win.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdickerson Member 102 posts Joined Nov 2010 Location: Solvang, Ca, USA More info | Mar 03, 2014 17:50 | #143 I, mostly, shoot with a 6D...ergo my two lens kit would be, EF 24-70 f/4L IS and EF 70-200 f/4L IS.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 03, 2014 22:10 | #144 Well this is not too glamorous but, for my 50D, I could make do with a Canon 15-85 and a Canon 70-300L. There is nothing very fast and no macro, but I'd be OK with those two. Canon 7d MkII, Canon 50D, Pentax 67, Canon 30D, Baker Custom 4x5, Canon EF 24-104mm f4, Canon EF 100mm f2.8 Macro, Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5, 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 03, 2014 22:54 | #145 Sigma 17-50 2.8 OS(I own) and the Sigma 70-200 2.8 OS(I want). 7DMK2 I EF 24-105 F4L I CANON 70-200 2.8L IS USM II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 04, 2014 03:10 | #146 Winwin wrote in post #16728790 24L or 16-35, 50L Mine would look the same, except that i guess we mean not the same 24L Sony A7RII | Sony A7S
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
| Latest registered member is KopiLuwak 1094 guests, 238 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
