So I've come to the cross roads where I need to decide what item I'm going to buy next. My current setup includes the following:
7D
430 EXII Flash
Canon 70-200 2.8 (Non IS)
18-55mm IS
Nifty Fifty
We are expecting our first child at the beginning of April (Woohoo!!!), and I'm look to expand the kit with something that will benefit more portrait/candid style pictures. (Probably targeting to eliminate the 18-55 if I get a lens and use the new lens as my primary portrait/walk around lens with nifty fifty in tow as well). I have about $600-$800 to spend (although I could stretch more if I wanted to). I think my options are as follows:
- Add another flash (Canon 600EX), ~$450 new (Mainly for portrait style shooting, using the 600 to control the 400 off camera)
- Tamron AF 28-75mm F/2.8 SP XR Di LD Aspherical (IF), ~$450 new
- Tamron SP 24-70 DI VC, ~$1200 new
- Canon 17-55mm F/2.8 IS USM, ~$850 new
What are everyone's thoughts about these options? I'm personally leaning towards a lens (as the 2nd flash would be solely for portrait type stuff). What are everyone's thoughts advice? Of the 3 lenses above, which offers the best bang for the buck? I've never used a Tamron lens but I have heard good things about the VC model (and bad as well), is it worth the upgrade over the LD model? What about the canon 18-55mm 2.8? I've not really seen too many people using this lens on the forum, and don't know if its because its marginal and people either go with the Tamron's or save for the Canon 20-70mm F2.8L. I shoot a lot of sports/out door stuff with the 70-200, would either the cheaper Tamron or the Canon be fast enough to be used as a complimentary shorter focal length to the 70-200 in these situations? I personally would like to go best bang for the buck (out of this group may be the Tamron 24-70mm VC), but also don't want to over spend as well. Thoughts?


