Apr 17, 2014 07:32 | #436 navydoc wrote in post #16840409  absolutic, I especially like the first image in your series. Is that around Sedona Thanks all images are from Sedona which we visited on Sunday. my youtube https://www.youtube.com …b_confirmation=1%5B%2Furl
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ptcanon3ti Cream of the Crop  More info | Apr 17, 2014 07:43 | #437 So, how do you a7r users find the resolution to be on this camera? How about the dynamic range and noise at high iso? I haven't been seeing many thoughts on those topics. I see most comments about focus issues. Paul
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 17, 2014 07:52 | #438 |
Apr 17, 2014 08:19 | #439 My main issue with a7r is colors and specifically skin colors. I get consistently comments on multiple forums that my Fuji X photos are better than my a7r photos. I can't point out to why but it has been consistent. Perhaps I have much more experience with Fuji X and my learning curve on Fuji. But I keep wondering why. my youtube https://www.youtube.com …b_confirmation=1%5B%2Furl
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ptcanon3ti Cream of the Crop More info | Apr 17, 2014 08:24 | #440 RedCatPhoto wrote in post #16840467 Resolution and IQ are top notch. Dynamic range is awesome. Noise at high ISO is pretty much on par with the 5DIII. I only manual focus so no issues whatsoever. absolutic wrote in post #16840512 My main issue with a7r is colors and specifically skin colors. I get consistently comments on multiple forums that my Fuji X photos are better than my a7r photos. I can't point out to why but it has been consistent. Perhaps I have much more experience with Fuji X and my learning curve on Fuji. But I keep wondering why. I assume you guys shoot raw. Can the shadows and highlights be pushed and pulled farther and your canon raw files? I assume this to be the case since we're talking about an Exmor sensor. Paul
LOG IN TO REPLY |
fogboundturtle Senior Member 735 posts Likes: 36 Joined Mar 2010 More info | Apr 17, 2014 08:25 | #441 ptcanon3ti wrote in post #16840532 I assume you guys shoot raw. Can the shadows and highlights be pushed and pulled farther and you canon raw files? I assume this to be the case since we're talking about an Exmor sensor. Yes. I can push it all the way with no noise. Canon 5D Mark III, Canon 70D, Canon EF 24-105L, Tamron 150-600mm, Tamron 70-200 F2.8 DI VC USD, Sony A7r, Sony FE 55mm F1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DavidArbogast Cream of the Crop  More info | Apr 17, 2014 08:55 | #442 Zeiss Apo Sonnar 2/135mm ZE (@ f/2):  Golden Light by David Arbogast, on Flickr Tulip Up by David Arbogast, on FlickrDavid | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 17, 2014 09:01 | #443 RedCatPhoto wrote in post #16840467 Resolution and IQ are top notch. Dynamic range is awesome. Noise at high ISO is pretty much on par with the 5DIII. I only manual focus so no issues whatsoever. I lve never shot a 5d III but the a7r is on par with at high ISO?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
fogboundturtle Senior Member 735 posts Likes: 36 Joined Mar 2010 More info | Apr 17, 2014 09:05 | #444 masberg24 wrote in post #16840622 I lve never shot a 5d III but the a7r is on par with at high ISO? Are you sure? It is not. Its actually quite noisier than my 5D3 and it starts at ISO 800. It cleans up nice but no where near an 5D3. Canon 5D Mark III, Canon 70D, Canon EF 24-105L, Tamron 150-600mm, Tamron 70-200 F2.8 DI VC USD, Sony A7r, Sony FE 55mm F1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 17, 2014 09:12 | #445 fogboundturtle wrote in post #16840633 It is not. Its actually quite noisier than my 5D3 and it starts at ISO 800. It cleans up nice but no where near an 5D3.
my youtube https://www.youtube.com …b_confirmation=1%5B%2Furl
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 17, 2014 09:19 | #446 A7r 35FE  my youtube https://www.youtube.com …b_confirmation=1%5B%2Furl
LOG IN TO REPLY |
fogboundturtle Senior Member 735 posts Likes: 36 Joined Mar 2010 More info | Apr 17, 2014 09:30 | #447 absolutic wrote in post #16840653 I disagree. I've shot more than 15000 shots with 5D3, and in my experience, 5D3 if shot RAW is just as noisy. DXO Labs agree (actually their figures for noise on 5D3 are worse than Sony A7r). The noise pattern on A7r appears at and is quite similar to Nikon D800's behavior. So if one has experience with D800, you are pretty much in the same territory with A7r. The difference in most of the full frame cameras of the last couple years is less than half-stop in any case between the current reining low light King (Nikon DF) and Canons and Sonys. This may change with Sony A7s but who knows. I agree, the noise pattern is better but there is noise at lower ISO on the A7r compare to the 5D3. I only had the camera for a 4 days or so. I need to spend more time with it. Canon 5D Mark III, Canon 70D, Canon EF 24-105L, Tamron 150-600mm, Tamron 70-200 F2.8 DI VC USD, Sony A7r, Sony FE 55mm F1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 17, 2014 09:35 | #448 |
navydoc Cream of the Crop  More info | The blossoms of my Indian Hawthorne bushes remind me of popcorn kernels.  popcorn blossoms by navydoc45, on FlickrWhile I was shooting the blossoms, this hummer arrived at the feeder which was right next to me and close to my right ear. I never saw him...but heard him next to me. Without turning my head, I pointed the camera in his general direction and took this shot. I didn't think it was too bad for a blind shot. I did level the image in post.  So, shooting a fast hummer using the Sony 55mm lens? No problem.   Hummer in my ear by navydoc45, on FlickrGene - My Photo Gallery ||
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 17, 2014 11:59 | #450 absolutic wrote in post #16840653 I disagree. I've shot more than 15000 shots with 5D3, and in my experience, 5D3 if shot RAW is just as noisy. DXO Labs agree (actually their figures for noise on 5D3 are worse than Sony A7r). The noise pattern on A7r appears at and is quite similar to Nikon D800's behavior. So if one has experience with D800, you are pretty much in the same territory with A7r. The difference in most of the full frame cameras of the last couple years is less than half-stop in any case between the current reining low light King (Nikon DF) and Canons and Sonys. This may change with Sony A7s but who knows. well it's not just noise, but smearing of the A7r. The noise isnt that bad, but all the detail is gone at 1600+ Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is griggt 1187 guests, 132 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
