400 f2.8 for sure!
figo Senior Member ![]() 699 posts Likes: 2 Joined Apr 2006 More info | Apr 20, 2014 09:38 | #16 400 f2.8 for sure! Canon 1D MKIV, 1D MKIII, Canon 70-200 f2.8, Canon 400 f2.8, Canon 16-35mm f2.8.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 21, 2014 09:27 | #17 rdalrt wrote in post #16839453 ![]() Mine does. I would love an aps-h sensor'd 1dx. Staszek wrote in post #16839798 ![]() Definitely. tmalone893 wrote in post #16841081 ![]() Yes, the 400 f/2.8 is awesome on both a crop and full frame. I have no doubt that the 400mm is exceptional lens. But if 400mm is sufficient on a full frame for these sports, then 300mm should be sufficient on a 1.3 crop. And isn't the 300mm lighter by 3 lbs and cheaper by $4000?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rdalrt Goldmember ![]() More info | Apr 21, 2014 09:44 | #18 frugivore wrote in post #16850075 ![]() I have no doubt that the 400mm is exceptional lens. But if 400mm is sufficient on a full frame for these sports, then 300mm should be sufficient on a 1.3 crop. And isn't the 300mm lighter by 3 lbs and cheaper by $4000? Now that I am usually shooting with a 1dx, I spend more time with the 1.4x extender on the 400 when the light is good. Or when the light isn't so good, I am moving with the action more than before. Just Sports Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
400mm f/2.8 www.zivnuska.zenfolio.com/blog
LOG IN TO REPLY |
taemo Goldmember 1,243 posts Likes: 7 Joined Sep 2011 Location: Calgary, AB More info | Apr 21, 2014 10:32 | #20 out of curiosity since most are recommending the 400 2.8, for what situation would you recommend the 300? earldieta.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
xchangx Senior Member 507 posts Joined May 2007 Location: Mobile, AL More info | Apr 21, 2014 10:42 | #21 taemo wrote in post #16850265 ![]() out of curiosity since most are recommending the 400 2.8, for what situation would you recommend the 300? the 300 2.8 is better for basketball. Otherwise, 400 all the way Nikon D4s / 2x D3s / D3 / 17-35 2.8 / 70-200 2.8 / 600 f4
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 21, 2014 10:55 | #22 xchangx wrote in post #16850279 ![]() the 300 2.8 is better for basketball. Otherwise, 400 all the way Yup, smaller courts/fields. 300 would probably work well for Tennis too. Gripped 7D, gripped, full-spectrum modfied T1i (500D), SX50HS, A2E film body, Tamzooka (150-600), Tamron 90mm/2.8 VC (ver 2), Tamron 18-270 VC, Canon FD 100 f/4.0 macro, Canon 24-105 f/4L,Canon EF 200 f/2.8LII, Canon 85 f/1.8, Tamron Adaptall 2 90mmf/2.5 Macro, Tokina 11-16, Canon EX-430 flash, Vivitar DF-383 flash, Astro-Tech AT6RC and Celestron NexStar 102 GT telescopes, various other semi-crappy manual lenses and stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bboowwyy Senior Member 253 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jan 2011 Location: Sydney, AU More info | It's really hard to make the decision without testing out both lenses.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 21, 2014 21:38 | #24 thanks for the input. Alot of great advice canon 30d, canon 1d mkIII, 50mm 1.8, 18-55mm, canon 1.4 extender, canon 400mm f2.8 IS, canon 70-200 f2.8 IS II, Canon 16-35mm f2.8,Pocket Wizards,430 ex II, 580 ex II, Canon 430 EX, sigma SA-9, 70-300 5.6, 28-80mm(which I NEVER use)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
Latest registered member is Dharmadme 851 guests, 265 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |