is the Canon Lens EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM really worth the extra 1k ?
I'm not really keen on almost $2700 in the IS II if I don't have to
Yes, IS is nice and I do appreciate it at times on my 100-400 EF f/4.5-5.6L IS USM
I am looking at the 70 - 200 as mainly an indoor/outdoor portraiture lens and as an overlap between the 24-105 and the 100-400 but obviously with the faster optics than either of those other 2 lenses
thanks for your thoughts