my gear is in my signature.
I spotted a somewhat grea deal on a new canon 6d + 24-70 f4 is for about 2600$.
I can probably sell my t3i and the 18-135 for 700$ (prices in my country are not the same).
so basically I need to invest 2000$ +- for a full frame + a decent (?) lens, and then i will cover 24-200.
I don't think I will need the 2.8 aperture on the walk-around lens, though it might come handy.
problem is it cost almost as much as this lens plus the camera body.
my questions are: Will I benefit from moving to a fullframe? and if so, is the 6d enough?
and what do you think about the 24-70 f4? is it equal to the 2.8 in iq etc'?
do you think the transition to all L-glass and a full frame body worth the price of admission?