So I have read several threads on this and I just want to get a consensus opinion.
I understand at 135 the prime has an extra stop and more pleasing "dreamy" quality to the pics.
Is the 70-200 IS II close at all? You'd have to zoom closer to 200mm to get the same amount of blur I know but is it markedly different?
Do any of you find it very limiting compared to the 70-200? I won't always be wanting to obliterate the background but the 135 seems to be very pleasing for this. I guess what I'm asking is does the 70-200 look more "generic" in feel compared to the prime?
I don't care about sharpness because I hear both are razors. IQ should be comparable between the two.
Last variation of the question, is a 70-200 F4 IS AND 135 better for fashion and portraiture or does the 70-200 2.8 pretty much cover all the bases of both of those?
Thanks in advance guys. Just wanting some more opinions.