I haven't a clue as to how you arrived at your comment. My critique was honest and to the point. My suggestion was to push the processing further than the OP had and I included a sample of my suggestion. And additionally I told the OP that his second offering of the shot was an improvement but I felt the processing could be pushed further.
Well, he/she started out with a highly detailed wide shot, and then tried to fix its lack of compelling subject by cropping the image. Then you sort of took this to the extreme by cropping it even more and doing whatever processing was was required to smear out all of the details and turn it into a visual mess. I thought that you were making a commentary on fixing something that was broken by following that train of thought a few steps too far towards its inevitable conclusion.
My bad. It looked like you were making a joke. If you were, it actually would have been a good joke, and it would have been a mean joke, but it still would have been kind of funny.
but since that wasn't what you were doing, never mind. I guess I just misread your intent.
Having said that, if you weren't joking, I don't quite see what your version adds to the image.