These are good recommendations. I would only change the 50mm to a 60mm 2.8 macro. I have many L lenses and the 60mm macro is sharper than all of them. Plus you get the use of a macro. And I certainly thought the 100mm f2 was a better all around lens than the 85mm 1.8. Less CA wide open, plus you get a slightly longer focal length which is nice if you also have a 50mm or 60mm lens. The 100mm f2 had nicer bokeh than the 85mm 1.8 as well. You can get some of these lenses used at great prices. Used, I've seen the 28mm 2.8 IS for $350. And I've seen used 60mm macro lenses going for $275 which is an incredible buy. So, my choices are ---
28mm 2.8 IS
60mm 2.8 macro
Interesting take on the macro lens. I've always wanted to to play with macro photography too.
My question is this; if I were to choose this lens over the 50 1.4 would I still get sharp shots wide open with it and how does the bokeh look compared to an f1.x lens?
Just realized that macro lens is an EF-S. I'll be getting a FF body. Is the 100mm Macro a good choice as well?