Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff Photography Industry News 
Thread started 28 Jun 2014 (Saturday) 16:57
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Sony's curved sensors

 
davidc502
Goldmember
Avatar
3,459 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 38
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Tennessee
     
Jun 28, 2014 16:57 |  #1

Sony will be introducing new curved sensors for improved image quality, and much better noise control. It's just got me thinking about Canon's innovation or lack of....

http://www.digitaltren​ds.com …ard-image-quality/#!5stXj (external link)


_
My Gear is ---> Here

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hw_
Member
97 posts
Joined Jan 2008
     
Jun 28, 2014 17:27 |  #2

The biggest benefit will much less glass needed for the lenses.


7D, EF 24-105mm, EF 85mm 1.8, EOS M + EF-M 18-55mm IS STM, EF-M 22mm STM, 430EXii, 90EX, YN-500EX, YN-622C, efm-2-ef adapter

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
WhyFi
Goldmember
Avatar
2,774 posts
Gallery: 246 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 845
Joined Apr 2008
Location: I got a castle in Brooklyn, that's where I dwell.
     
Jun 28, 2014 17:38 |  #3

I'm sure that I'm visualizing it in overly-simplistic terms, but why wouldn't the desired amount of curvature vary from lens to lens?


Bill is my name - I'm the most wanted man on my island, except I'm not on my island, of course. More's the pity.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davidc502
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,459 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 38
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Tennessee
     
Jun 28, 2014 19:50 |  #4

hw_ wrote in post #17000066 (external link)
The biggest benefit will much less glass needed for the lenses.

Hopefully that equates to lighter and smaller lenses for 35mm sized sensors.

Who knows... maybe Canon can strike a deal with Sony?


_
My Gear is ---> Here

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
texaskev
Goldmember
Avatar
1,469 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 278
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Austin & Dallas Texas
     
Jun 28, 2014 20:30 as a reply to  @ davidc502's post |  #5

This will be interesting to follow the development over the next few years. Maybe this would bring med format IQ to the 35mm platform?


Canon 1DX II, 1DX, 11-24 F4 L, 100 F2.8 L, 16-35 F2.8 L II, 17-40 F4 L, 24-70 F2.8 L II, 24-105 F4 L II, 70-200 F2.8 L II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
panicatnabisco
Senior Member
Avatar
972 posts
Gallery: 33 photos
Likes: 329
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Mountain View, CA
     
Jun 28, 2014 22:52 |  #6

this would make tilt shift lenses useless


Canon 1DX III | 1DX | 6D II | 6D | 16-35/2.8 II | 24-70/2.8 II | 35/1.4 II | 50/1.8 | 70-200/2.8 IS II | 85/1.4 IS | 100/2.8 IS macro | 200mm f/2 | 400/2.8 IS II | 2xIII
Leica M8.2 | Noctilux 50 f/1 | Elmarit 90/2.8
afimages.net (external link) | Facebook (external link) | instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ejenner
Goldmember
Avatar
3,867 posts
Gallery: 98 photos
Likes: 1136
Joined Nov 2011
Location: Denver, CO
     
Jun 28, 2014 23:25 as a reply to  @ panicatnabisco's post |  #7

Doesn't seem like a great idea to me. Even with Canons large range of lenses a lot of people want to use 3rd party lenses and it seems like this would make that impossible.

Seems like a good idea on paper, not sure it will take off, especially if it only gets used in Sony cameras.


Edward Jenner
5DIV, M6, GX1 II, Sig15mm FE, 16-35 F4,TS-E 17, TS-E 24, 35 f2 IS, M11-22, M18-150 ,24-105, T45 1.8VC, 70-200 f4 IS, 70-200 2.8 vII, Sig 85 1.4, 100L, 135L, 400DOII.
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/48305795@N03/ (external link)
https://www.facebook.c​om/edward.jenner.372/p​hotos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GregDunn
Goldmember
Avatar
1,289 posts
Likes: 132
Joined Mar 2013
Location: Indiana
     
Jun 28, 2014 23:58 |  #8

WhyFi wrote in post #17000074 (external link)
I'm sure that I'm visualizing it in overly-simplistic terms, but why wouldn't the desired amount of curvature vary from lens?

If used in an interchangeable lens camera, every lens would have to be designed to have the same curvature. Er, just like today. This might be useful in a fixed- lens camera though, as it would simplify the lens design somewhat.


Canon 1Dx | 5D3 | 7D2 | 6D | 70-200L f/2.8IS | 70-200L f/4 | 24-70L f/2.8 | 24-105L f/4IS | 100-400L f/4.5-5.6IS | 17-55 f/2.8IS | 50 f/1.8 | 28-105 f/3.5-4.5 | 4x Godox AD360

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jmcgee131
Member
Avatar
249 posts
Gallery: 25 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 78
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Indianapolis
     
Jun 29, 2014 00:19 |  #9

GregDunn wrote in post #17000509 (external link)
If used in an interchangeable lens camera, every lens would have to be designed to have the same curvature. Er, just like today. This might be useful in a fixed- lens camera though, as it would simplify the lens design somewhat.


I agree. I see the point and shoot/Phone market grabbing these up and giving you better imaging quality @ a drastically reduced effort. IE creating a f1.8 for a phone with simple fixed parameters, and a curved sensor taking low light to new levels on the next generations.


Feed back #1#2
Learning to read light one click at a time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Shadowblade
Cream of the Crop
5,806 posts
Gallery: 26 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 401
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Jun 29, 2014 01:50 |  #10

It'd be of very limited use for any kind of interchangeable-lens system - all the lenses would need to have the same curvature, all sensors would have to be built to the same curvature, and tilt-shift functions would be unuseable. Third-party lenses would also be unuseable.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Eyal
Senior Member
569 posts
Joined May 2011
     
Jun 29, 2014 07:27 |  #11

The question remains will this force everyone to new lenses in order to take all the benefits of these new sensors or the usage can be achieved with current lenses.
I can't imagine how everyone are going to replace them glass (especially people with several thousands per single glass) for this.
But at least it will make a 800mm affordable all of a sudden :p


5DMarkIII+Grip | Extender 1.4x III / 2x III
16-35mm F/2.8L II | 24-70mm F/2.8L II | 70-200mm F/2.8L IS II
Σ 50mm F/1.4 | 85mm F/1.2L II | 100mm F/2.8L IS Macro | 135mm F/2L | 300mm F/2.8L IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Shadowblade
Cream of the Crop
5,806 posts
Gallery: 26 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 401
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Jun 29, 2014 07:57 |  #12

Eyal wrote in post #17000891 (external link)
The question remains will this force everyone to new lenses in order to take all the benefits of these new sensors or the usage can be achieved with current lenses.
I can't imagine how everyone are going to replace them glass (especially people with several thousands per single glass) for this.
But at least it will make a 800mm affordable all of a sudden :p

Current lenses won't work, because they're designed to project a flat focal plane. Use them on a curved sensor and you'll get a ring of sharp focus, with everything inside or outside that ring out of focus. The same would apply if you used a lens with a curved focal plane, whose curve did not exactly match that of the sensor.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
2ndviolinman
Senior Member
346 posts
Likes: 4
Joined May 2011
     
Jul 02, 2014 19:22 |  #13

Could be good, could be one more thing to decenter, for those who worry about that.


David
5Dc, 5Dii, Canon 16-35 f/4L IS, 40/2.8 Pancake, 85/1.8, 100/2.8 Macro, 135/2.0L, 200/2.8L, converted 35mm TS, Sigma 50/2.8 Macro, 70/2.8 Macro, Zeiss ZE 21/2.8, Zeiss Contax 28/2.8, 50/1.7 & 85/2.8, Jena 135/3.5, Voigtlander 90mm f/3.5 APO, Canon 28-135.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
samsen
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,468 posts
Likes: 239
Joined Apr 2006
Location: LA
     
Jul 21, 2014 21:13 |  #14

Finally....
Seems at least seems some engineers thought clear, smart and closer look to real world Just to see how the best know camera to us is made up: I am talking of "Eyes"!
Wouldn't it be good for these math genus guys to take some anatomy classes too? We might have as well had this sensor long long time back.


Weak retaliates,
Strong Forgives,
Intelligent Ignores!
Samsen
Picture editing OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,697 views & 0 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it.
Sony's curved sensors
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff Photography Industry News 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
2017 guests, 117 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.