Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 30 Jun 2014 (Monday) 09:11
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

alternatives to canon 100-400 for antarctica

 
iwm
Hatchling
2 posts
Joined Sep 2011
     
Jun 30, 2014 09:11 |  #1

have signed up for trip to antarctica this december. looking for something better than my current 70-300 f/4-5.6 for a telephoto for my 6d. Also probably taking 16-35 and 24-70. Several sites seem to recommend the 100-400 for antarctica. Any other options I should be considering?

thanks

Van




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
48,405 posts
Gallery: 84 photos
Likes: 4507
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Jun 30, 2014 10:20 |  #2

What about your current lens are you looking to improve on?


There is the 70-300mm L
One photographer on this site recommends and uses the 28-300mm L for his trips to Antarctica.
I recall the 28-300mm being a choice due to the hardships in swapping lenses in that environment.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
iwm
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
2 posts
Joined Sep 2011
     
Jun 30, 2014 11:43 |  #3

looking for more range - from what I have read a little more than 300mm is optimal for antarctica. Also a little sharper lens. My 70-300 starts to get a bit soft after about 230-250.

the 28-300 is another option. As you mentioned, don't have to worry about swapping, but lose a little at both the wide and long ends. Its also a bit pricer than the 100-400

Van




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
joeseph
"smells like turd"
Avatar
9,427 posts
Gallery: 54 photos
Likes: 1287
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
     
Jul 01, 2014 02:20 |  #4

I'd be considering another body as well as lens choice, consider the possibility of a failure as it's not as though you can pop along to the nearest B&H if something untoward happens...


some fairly old canon camera stuff, canon lenses, Manfrotto "thingy", 1D MK II converted for IR, and now an M5
TF posting: here :-)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
12,729 posts
Gallery: 1114 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 8152
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
     
Jul 01, 2014 04:19 |  #5

iwm wrote in post #17002888 (external link)
have signed up for trip to antarctica this december. looking for something better than my current 70-300 f/4-5.6 for a telephoto for my 6d. Also probably taking 16-35 and 24-70. Several sites seem to recommend the 100-400 for antarctica. Any other options I should be considering?

thanks

Van

Heya,

A weather sealed L makes sense to me. The 6D has minor weather sealing too. The 100-400 makes sense. It's compact enough yet 400mm. Grainted it's only 100mm more than your current 300mm lens. Not sure how much reach you'll want or need for your intended purposes. If you're shooting wildlife, the 400 for sure. If you're not shooting wildlife, then I wouldn't stress the telephoto so much, as Antarctica is all about sweeping landscapes where your wider angle lenses come into play.

I would take an inexpensive backup body too. Don't want to miss out on stuff just because of an accident or failure. I always have two bodies on me. Even if it's just a junk $180 XSi or something, it will still do better than a cellphone or P&S will with my lenses.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gibbit1
Goldmember
Avatar
1,658 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Valdese, nc
     
Jul 01, 2014 06:33 |  #6

You could consider the new Tamron 150-600mm (if they ever get it back in stock). It's got twice the range of your 70-300mm and is moisture resistant. I'd still get a Lens Coat for both it and my camera body for added protection. I completely agree with taking a second body, too.


"Everything will be alright. I'm from the government and I'm here to help."
Gear: EOS 5DMKII; EOS 400D (infrared converted); Canon 24-105mm f/4 L; Sigma 17-35mm f/2.8-4 EX; Canon 70-200mm f/4 L; Canon 135mm f/2.0 L; Pentax SMC Takumar 50mm f/1.4 with EOS adaptor, Rokinon 14mm f/2.8; only enough knowledge to be a clear and present danger to society.
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scott ­ M
Goldmember
3,089 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 180
Joined May 2008
Location: Michigan
     
Jul 01, 2014 06:59 |  #7

Sigma makes a 120-400mm OS lens that is physically similar in size. There is also the Sigma 150-500mm OS and Tamron 150-600mm VC, but both are considerably larger lenses -- I would expect you want to keep the weight and size of your equipment down on such a trip.

I'll also throw my hat in on recommending a 2nd body. Not only does it give you a backup, but it will also allow you to keep both a telephoto and wider lens mounted at the same time, thereby greatly reducing the number of lens changes needed in a harsh environment and allowing you to be ready for almost any shooting situation. For these types of trips, I travel with a 5D3, 7D, 24-105L, 100-400L, 16-35L f/4 IS (just got it to replace the 17-40L), and 40mm pancake. The 100-400L stays mounted on the 7D all the time for wildlife, while the 16-35 and 24-105 alternate on the 5D3. The pancake is for a light weight faster walk around on the 5D3 -- it takes up almost zero space in the bag.


Photo Gallery (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JBlake
Member
126 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 14
Joined Apr 2012
Location: North Carolina
     
Jul 01, 2014 07:58 |  #8

Scott M wrote in post #17004771 (external link)
I'll also throw my hat in on recommending a 2nd body. Not only does it give you a backup, but it will also allow you to keep both a telephoto and wider lens mounted at the same time

Just go to a camera/lens rental company and rent a Canon 70D + 70-300L. Give yourself a few days before departure to AFMA this camera/lens combo. Leave the 70D and 70-300L permanently attached for the duration of your trip.

Since you are going to the Antarctica at the tail end of spring, there will be more than enough light for this slower lens; the sun never sets at this time of the year.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scott_online
Senior Member
360 posts
Gallery: 80 photos
Best ofs: 7
Likes: 907
Joined Aug 2009
     
Jul 01, 2014 14:32 |  #9

You don't need a lot of reach for Antarctica. The wildlife is tame and comes to you. A 70-200 of some description and a 1.4x extender will serve you well. I'd also recommend a second camera - but something pocketable like a m4/3 - so you can have both on you at all times. Lugging around 2 DSLRs is a pain at best and almost impossible in a zodiac. And get yourself a decent rain-cover for the SLR. I like the Think Tank Hydrophobia but there are lots of others.

Some of my Antarctica shots here: https://flic.kr/s/aHsj​PXf5uR (external link)

(I took a 300/2.8 but often ended up shooting it at f/4-5.6 to get depth of field because everything is so close).


flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AlanU
Cream of the Crop
6,439 posts
Gallery: 57 photos
Likes: 555
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Jul 01, 2014 14:44 |  #10

Scott,

Impressive photos!!


5Dmkiv |5Dmkiii | 24LmkII | 35mm f/2 IS | 85 mkII L | 100L | 16-35L mkII | 24-70 f/2.8L mkii| 70-200 f/2.8 ISL mkII| 600EX-RT x2 | 580 EX II x2 | Einstein's
Fuji X-T2 w/battery booster | 16mm f/1.4 | 56 f/1.2 | 10-24 f/4.0 | 50-140 | TT685
Sony A7iii w/ Sigma MC-11 adapter | Sigma Art 24 f/1.4 | Godox V860iiS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

2,512 views & 0 likes for this thread
alternatives to canon 100-400 for antarctica
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Guy Berridge
826 guests, 389 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.