I'll be using a 6D likely on a tripod. Choices are 35mm f/2.0, 85mm f/1.8, 24-105L f/4.0 or 70-200L f/2.8
What's likely to give me the best results?
IlliniFan99 Member 83 posts Likes: 3 Joined Mar 2013 More info | Jul 04, 2014 18:41 | #1 I'll be using a 6D likely on a tripod. Choices are 35mm f/2.0, 85mm f/1.8, 24-105L f/4.0 or 70-200L f/2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bob_r Goldmember More info | Jul 04, 2014 18:46 | #2 My choice would be the 24_105. Canon 7D, 5D, 35L, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.8, 135L, 200L, 10-22, 17-55, 70-300, 100-400L, 500D, 580EX(2).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wallace River " ...a bit of a pervy voyeur " ![]() More info | I used my 70-200 f/2.8 IS......perfect result. IAN - Living life on the shores of the Wallace River in northern Nova Scotia, Canada :
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 04, 2014 19:01 | #4 Wallace River wrote in post #17011973 ![]() I used my 70-200 f/2.8 IS......perfect result. Any idea what settings you used?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wallace River " ...a bit of a pervy voyeur " ![]() More info | Jul 04, 2014 19:05 | #5 IlliniFan99 wrote in post #17011974 ![]() Any idea what settings you used? Yep! ISO 100, f/8, bulb setting, 3-5 seconds depending on how bright they were, of course on a tripod. I was about 3/4 mi. away over water. IAN - Living life on the shores of the Wallace River in northern Nova Scotia, Canada :
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 04, 2014 19:08 | #6 Wallace River wrote in post #17011979 ![]() Yep! ISO 100, f/8, bulb setting, 3-5 seconds depending on how bright they were, of course on a tripod. I was about 3/4 mi. away over water. https://www.flickr.com …r/sets/72157645046316329/ ![]() Great results. Thanks for sharing.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 04, 2014 19:13 | #7 Distance plays a major factor. I bring my 24-105 and 70-200 f/4.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Moonshiner Senior Member ![]() 753 posts Likes: 1010 Joined Jul 2013 Location: Mil-yucky, Whiskonsin More info | Jul 04, 2014 19:22 | #8 I'd say 24-105...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
guruofall Member 100 posts Likes: 12 Joined Jun 2009 Location: Pune, MH, India More info | Jul 06, 2014 00:49 | #9 I used Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 this time along with 24-105 for last couple of shots. 14mm gave excellent results. Please check below. I cropped hell out of some shots Gear: Canon EOS 6D | Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 | 24-105mm f/4 IS L | 50mm f/1.8 | 100mm f/2.8 Macro | Tamron SP 150-600 f/5-6.3 Di VC USD | 580 ex ii
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Motor On Senior Member ![]() 941 posts Likes: 52 Joined Feb 2007 More info | Jul 06, 2014 01:16 | #10 mike_d wrote in post #17011984 ![]() Distance plays a major factor. I bring my 24-105 and 70-200 f/4. This, I've used the 16-35, 50 and 70-200 this weekend alone depending upon if they were going off within 100 yards or a few blocks away. What also matters is how much additional scene you want with them. Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 06, 2014 05:28 | #11 ![]() I used a 60D and a 15-85. Focal lengths from 15-57 (24-92mm). Next year, I'll have a 24-105 on my 6D. WARNING: I often dispense advice in fields I know little about!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
outofbounds Senior Member ![]() 769 posts Likes: 3 Joined Apr 2014 Location: Northwest Ohio More info | Jul 06, 2014 06:00 | #12 GeoKras1989 wrote in post #17014200 ![]() I used a 60D and a 15-85. Focal lengths from 15-57 (24-92mm). Next year, I'll have a 24-105 on my 6D. ISO 100, bulb (I used from 1 to 22 seconds), f/11. Distance matters. From further away, you'd need a longer lens and larger aperture, or higher ISO. Someone above mentioned brightness as a time factor. That is mistaken. The aperture and ISO totally regulate the brightness of the individual explosions. Time regulates how many explosions you get in the shot. I used an 18-55 kit lens at 18mm night before last. Trust me, it wasn't wide enough! Some fireworks were high, some were low, some left, some right. Get the widest lens you can! Fireworks are all over the sky. (I still got some great photos, but I lost a bunch too!) R. Lee
LOG IN TO REPLY |
yogestee "my posts can be a little colourful" ![]() More info | Jul 06, 2014 07:04 | #13 IlliniFan99 wrote in post #17011957 ![]() I'll be using a 6D likely on a tripod. Choices are 35mm f/2.0, 85mm f/1.8, 24-105L f/4.0 or 70-200L f/2.8 What's likely to give me the best results? Depends how far away you are from the fire works and how much of the sky you want to fill. Jurgen
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gjl711 "spouting off stupid things" ![]() 56,236 posts Likes: 2932 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Deep in the heart of Texas More info | Jul 06, 2014 07:26 | #14 yogestee wrote in post #17014257 ![]() Depends how far away you are from the fire works and how much of the sky you want to fill. This. I have used a 17-40 and wished for wider and a 100-400 and wished for longer. Its all dependent on how far they are from you and how much of the frame you wish to fill. 400mm and far away. Not sure why, but call me JJ.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 06, 2014 08:10 | #15 ![]() outofbounds wrote in post #17014215 ![]() I used an 18-55 kit lens at 18mm night before last. Trust me, it wasn't wide enough! Some fireworks were high, some were low, some left, some right. Get the widest lens you can! Fireworks are all over the sky. (I still got some great photos, but I lost a bunch too!) BTW, I used ISO 100, 2 seconds. The pics that were in frame were really good, but I missed about 50% of what I took. I used a remote switch, but at first I was clicking too early. Watch your live view and click when the burst is spread out good, just before it fades. Clicking too soon gives a small and un-impressive shot. Fixing your shutter speed so short limits you to only one or two explosions per frame. Set f/11 or f/16, ISO 100. Use BULB and just play with holding the shutter open. My shoot this year had a few at one second and one a seventeen seconds. There were 195 shots in between somewhere. This one made our local papers #1 spot for "Photos You Have to See!" Seventeen second exposure. WARNING: I often dispense advice in fields I know little about!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
Latest registered member is Eternal Louper 739 guests, 309 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |