Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 20 Jul 2014 (Sunday) 01:28
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Do you like shooting but dread processing?

 
Savethemoment
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
491 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 73
Joined Jun 2012
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Jul 21, 2014 07:08 |  #31

frugivore wrote in post #17045441 (external link)
I like shooting, I hate culling, I like processing. In most cases, I'm using single shot so I don't have five similar pictures to have to choose from.

But I really do like processing, probably because I'm still learning and it's somewhat of a challenge for me.

I probably should have been a bit clearer in my title and first post... I really meant culling and processing, which to me are all part of the same exercise. The only bit of it I really enjoy is finding and working on my very best shots - the top 0.1% which make me go *wow*. The rest starts to feel like a chore, although I do become very absorbed in it and will sometimes sit at the computer for hours despite feeling cold, hungry, thirsty etc. I keep thinking "just one more shot, one more tweak..".

I also don't do much heavy manipulation of images, and mainly use LR rather than Photoshop (I only have Elements anyway). But since I still have a lot to learn about processing I'll experiment with the various sliders etc just to see what's possible with different combinations. Then I'll watch another tutorial and want to try something new... it all eats up lots of time :)


Always learning
Always looking for the good light

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kf095
Out buying Wheaties
Avatar
7,474 posts
Gallery: 63 photos
Likes: 1078
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Canada, Ontario, Milton
     
Jul 21, 2014 10:04 as a reply to  @ post 17043533 |  #32

I have done enough of editing, while I was part-time computer graphics artist at begining of nineties.
Now I'm not using Photoshop, waste of my private time. I use old LR version to modify/adjust my RAWs from DSLRS and TIFFs from film scanner.
With DSLRs I use L lenses to get high IQ SOOC, with only few adjustments needed in PP. Pictures must be taken under correct light for it, of course :)

But If I want fancy picture I use iPhone applications to get tweaked picture. They are worth only to post them on the Internet anyway. :D


M-E and ME blog (external link). Flickr (external link). my DigitaL and AnaLog Gear.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Larry ­ Johnson
Goldmember
Avatar
1,397 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 487
Joined Sep 2011
Location: Virginia
     
Jul 21, 2014 11:14 |  #33

Savethemoment wrote in post #17045463 (external link)
I also don't do much heavy manipulation of images, and mainly use LR rather than Photoshop (I only have Elements anyway). But since I still have a lot to learn about processing I'll experiment with the various sliders etc just to see what's possible with different combinations. Then I'll watch another tutorial and want to try something new... it all eats up lots of time :)

Well this is baffling to me. If you're not making heavy adjustments to your images, then you shouldn't be spending a great deal of time in LR. If you're watching tutorials and learning how to use new LR tools, then that will indeed take up some time, but learning IS fun. If you don't agree with that, then watch tutorials to improve your photography so that you don't have to as much development.

I suppose you could upgrade to LR5 which allows you to Black Flag images for deleting with the stroke of one key (X). That might improve your culling efficiency.


_______________
Ain't Nature Grand!
Shooting 7D2 with Canon 400mm, f/5.6.
60D, canon 18-135 EFS, and 1.4 extender in the bag.
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TTUShooter
Senior Member
Avatar
378 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Likes: 126
Joined Oct 2012
Location: Dallas, TX
     
Jul 21, 2014 11:42 |  #34

put me in the "shoot tons, but delete many" camp too.


Cameras: EOS 7d mark II, Fuji X100F, Leica M8, Leica M2-R,
Lenses: A Whole mess of them.
My flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
steelbluesleepr
Goldmember
1,234 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 68
Joined Dec 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO
     
Jul 21, 2014 13:07 |  #35

I really enjoy processing, but I hate batch-editing. I could (and have) spend 10+ hours on one really cool image, but when it's a whole set of 500+ images that all have a problem that has to be fixed on ALL of them, it gets very annoying. I'm dealing with that right now with some auto-x pans I shot yesterday that all have bad dust spots in the sky since I was using a borrowed lens that I didn't realize wasn't cleaned properly.


-Jayson- my flickr (external link)
In the bag: 5D mark II+Vello grio/10d+grip/Canon 17-40L/Canon 28-135/Canon 50 1.8/Canon 35-80 Macro Conversion/Vivitar 135 2.8 M42/Vivitar 28 2.5 M42/Yongnuo YN460II x3/Yongnuo RF-602 x3

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
whuband
Goldmember
Avatar
1,433 posts
Likes: 84
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
     
Jul 21, 2014 20:21 |  #36

If I could afford to pay a processor, I would rarely sit down at the computer. I don't mind culling and cropping, but the rest of it is a PITA.


1D4, 6D, 7D2, Sony a6000 with Sony16-70, Rokinon 12mmf2, Canon lenses: 17-40L, 17-55 f2.8, 10-22, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.8, 70-200mm IS 2.8, 300mm 2.8 IS, 580EXII (3), 430EX, Alien Bees.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dan ­ Marchant
Do people actually believe in the Title Fairy?
Avatar
5,634 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 2056
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Where I'm from is unimportant, it's where I'm going that counts.
     
Jul 22, 2014 00:08 |  #37

airfrogusmc wrote in post #17043533 (external link)
I expose for the way I am going to process so I always approach post processing as part two or step two of the process. Taking the photograph and getting that right to the way I'm going to process is only the first part. The second part is then processing that image to what I saw in my minds eye at the moment of exposure and then there's making the print. All of those parts are all equally important for me to get my vision fully captured.

+2 to this. Until recently it was +1 as I shot and then processed. Recently I got into printing which adds and extra layer.


Dan Marchant
Website/blog: danmarchant.com (external link)
Instagram: @dan_marchant (external link)
Gear Canon 5DIII + Fuji X-T2 + lenses + a plastic widget I found in the camera box.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FarmerTed1971
fondling the 5D4
Avatar
7,352 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 5909
Joined Sep 2013
Location: Portland, OR
     
Jul 22, 2014 00:18 |  #38

Me too. And I actually like post.

I love experimenting in LR and PS. My former life (before going back to the family business) was as a graphic designer so I used digital editing software everyday and this is an even better extension of that where I get to create first with the shots and then embellish with processing.

Dan Marchant wrote in post #17045087 (external link)
I enjoy the PP but I cull heavily, process the star photos and leave the rest.


Getting better at this - Fuji X-t5 & X-t3 - 16 1.4 - 35/50/90 f2 - 50-140 - flickr (external link) - www.scottaticephoto.co​m (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
steelbluesleepr
Goldmember
1,234 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 68
Joined Dec 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO
     
Jul 22, 2014 13:50 as a reply to  @ FarmerTed1971's post |  #39

I almost always throw a movie or TV show on my second monitor while I'm editing pictures. Brainless action movies are the best since I don't have to pay attention to them. It helps the process go easier for me.


-Jayson- my flickr (external link)
In the bag: 5D mark II+Vello grio/10d+grip/Canon 17-40L/Canon 28-135/Canon 50 1.8/Canon 35-80 Macro Conversion/Vivitar 135 2.8 M42/Vivitar 28 2.5 M42/Yongnuo YN460II x3/Yongnuo RF-602 x3

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 569
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Jul 22, 2014 14:36 |  #40

I don't know how seriously I should take this thread, so I guess I'll just "respond" but not say anything meaningful!:)


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dinzdale40
Senior Member
Avatar
255 posts
Gallery: 62 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 155
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Chattanooga TN
     
Jul 23, 2014 09:05 |  #41

I enjoy post processing. To me it is finishing the job (i'm a bit OCD about finishing photo projects) and getting to really look at what I captured. It becomes exciting when you are happy with what you got. I have had disappointments and yea, I hate processing those where I messed up on a shoot.


-Daniel

5DMk3

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
watt100
Cream of the Crop
14,021 posts
Likes: 34
Joined Jun 2008
     
Jul 24, 2014 05:59 |  #42

TTUShooter wrote in post #17045996 (external link)
put me in the "shoot tons, but delete many" camp too.

I delete a lot but good processing makes a good photo better




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rjx
Goldmember
Avatar
2,670 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Santa Clara, California
     
Jul 26, 2014 04:21 |  #43

airfrogusmc wrote in post #17043533 (external link)
I expose for the way I am going to process so I always approach post processing as part two or step two of the process. Taking the photograph and getting that right to the way I'm going to process is only the first part. The second part is then processing that image to what I saw in my minds eye at the moment of exposure and then there's making the print. All of those parts are all equally important for me to get my vision fully captured.

bw!

I share the same philosophy as you.

For me processing is part of the photographic process. It's part of the fun of being a photographer. Processing allows me to bring my images to life. Processing allows me to put my personal touches on my images and gives me more of a photographic voice.


"It doesn't matter what camera you have if your photography has nothing worthwhile to say"
“Photos are everywhere. You just have to know how to look.”

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
panicatnabisco
Senior Member
Avatar
972 posts
Gallery: 33 photos
Likes: 329
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Mountain View, CA
     
Jul 26, 2014 05:04 |  #44

To me, shooting is half the fun and editing brings it closer to my vision. I just fire up my music player and edit away.

If SOOC is all you need, don't let anyone convince you otherwise. We all have our own way of doing things :)


Canon 1DX III | 1DX | 6D II | 6D | 16-35/2.8 II | 24-70/2.8 II | 35/1.4 II | 50/1.8 | 70-200/2.8 IS II | 85/1.4 IS | 100/2.8 IS macro | 200mm f/2 | 400/2.8 IS II | 2xIII
Leica M8.2 | Noctilux 50 f/1 | Elmarit 90/2.8
afimages.net (external link) | Facebook (external link) | instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kolor-Pikker
Goldmember
2,790 posts
Likes: 59
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Moscow
     
Jul 26, 2014 05:19 |  #45

Finding a good shot means not just being in the right place at the right time, but also having the vision to see a photo opportunity, if you can't find inspiration in your neighborhood you won't find it elsewhere, you'll just come back with tourism-grade photos.
Getting a good shot just means I was skilled enough to use my equipment properly, this is the most boring part of photography.
Processing is where I interpret what the camera saw into what I wanted to see at the time, cameras are terrible at this, which is where stuff like Photoshop comes in. It doesn't mean that everything needs to have filters or crazy color changes, but a bunch of small tweaks to a good photo can make it great, even if they doesn't necessarily make the photo look significantly different from the original.


5DmkII | 24-70 f/2.8L II | Pentax 645Z | 55/2.8 SDM | 120/4 Macro | 150/2.8 IF
I acquired an expensive camera so I can hang out in forums, annoy wedding photographers during formals and look down on P&S users... all the while telling people it's the photographer, not the camera.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7,549 views & 0 likes for this thread, 32 members have posted to it and it is followed by 3 members.
Do you like shooting but dread processing?
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
1494 guests, 123 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.