Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras 
Thread started 30 Jul 2014 (Wednesday) 13:39
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

6D Owners Unite! Discuss and post Photos! (2)

 
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
16,218 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 6292
Joined Sep 2007
     
Aug 14, 2014 14:57 |  #331

sirquack wrote in post #17096260 (external link)
Never thought I would say this, but that is an aweful lot of noise at 12800. I have shots at 20000 that don't appear to have that much noise. I did do some NR, but wow, that is really noisy for a low ISO on this body.

well that's because he played with the curves to give that look, and that's messing with the raw. I dont see the noise an issue really, looks like good ol grain, and it would print fine, even fairly larger sizes.


Sony A7riii/A9 - FE 12-24/4 - FE 24-240 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 28/2 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - EF 135/1.8 Art - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Astro Rok 14/2.8 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 RXD, 70-200/2.8 VC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
RW123
Senior Member
Avatar
721 posts
Gallery: 111 photos
Likes: 1389
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Western WA.
     
Aug 14, 2014 19:18 |  #332

Nice post processing -- I like the retro B&W look--very cool!


Rich
Gear List | My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
eNTiTy
Member
102 posts
Joined May 2014
Location: Texas, USA
     
Aug 14, 2014 21:12 |  #333

frederiksenp wrote in post #17095053 (external link)
Another at ISO 4000. The performance on this sensor is really great.

QUOTED IMAGE
Determination by Paul Frederiksen on 500px (external link)

It's images like this one, great shot by the way, that makes me feel fortunate being a disabled individual living in the good ol' USA :)


Entity = NTT = Natalie
6D | 40D | 17-35 f/2.8L USM | 24-70 f/2.8L USM | 28-135 f/3.5-5.6 IS USM | 24-105 f/4L IS USM | 40 f/2.8 | 50 f/1.8 MkI | 85 f/1.8 USM | 70-210 f/4 (1st gen-can't seem to let it go :o) | 70-200 f/2.8L IS USM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
frederiksenp
Senior Member
Avatar
607 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Baltimore, MD
     
Aug 14, 2014 22:08 |  #334

eNTiTy wrote in post #17096953 (external link)
It's images like this one, great shot by the way, that makes me feel fortunate being a disabled individual living in the good ol' USA :)

Thanks! Yeah, they don't exactly have the ADA in Hanoi :)


Baltimore, MD Photographer | Sports Photographer | Canon 6D | Canon 7D | 70-200 f2.8 | 17-40 f/4 | 40 f/2.8 | 85 f/1.2 | 50 f/1.4 | Sigma 120-300 f/2.8
Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
frederiksenp
Senior Member
Avatar
607 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Baltimore, MD
     
Aug 14, 2014 22:09 |  #335

Charlie wrote in post #17096294 (external link)
well that's because he played with the curves to give that look, and that's messing with the raw. I dont see the noise an issue really, looks like good ol grain, and it would print fine, even fairly larger sizes.

Yup. I don't understand why the majority people on this site have fear of grain/noise. Embrace it.


Baltimore, MD Photographer | Sports Photographer | Canon 6D | Canon 7D | 70-200 f2.8 | 17-40 f/4 | 40 f/2.8 | 85 f/1.2 | 50 f/1.4 | Sigma 120-300 f/2.8
Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheInfamousGreedo
Goldmember
1,631 posts
Likes: 4049
Joined Jun 2012
Location: Summit County, Colorado
     
Aug 14, 2014 23:10 |  #336

IMAGE: https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3883/14736092590_df266f2bcb_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/osbj​VU  (external link) IMG_5687 (external link) by TJ Simon (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE: https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5559/14919686711_f7f90a13fa_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/oJpi​4M  (external link) IMG_5691 (external link) by TJ Simon (external link), on Flickr

TJ Simon (external link)
flickr (external link)
Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pfliu
Hatchling
4 posts
Joined Aug 2012
     
Aug 15, 2014 00:19 as a reply to  @ Charlie's post |  #337

http://www.flickr.com …32529293@N02/14​898344472/ (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
woos
Goldmember
Avatar
2,224 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Dec 2008
Location: a giant bucket
     
Aug 15, 2014 01:07 |  #338

Tumalo falls:

IMAGE: http://amanathia.zenfolio.com/img/s7/v156/p347828315-5.jpg

amanathia.zenfolio.com

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sirquack
Goldmember
Avatar
2,571 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 915
Joined Jan 2013
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
     
Aug 15, 2014 08:08 |  #339

Don't get me wrong, I am not adverse to noise. I guess I was just commenting on the amount of noise on what I would consider for this body a relatively reasonable ISO.
I personally still like the shot as others have said, it has the vintage look that I am actually used to since I was a film guy until only the last couple of years.

frederiksenp wrote in post #17097036 (external link)
Yup. I don't understand why the majority people on this site have fear of grain/noise. Embrace it.


Name is Ron.
Bodies - 6D/5D3/7D2-Gripped
Lenses - Canon 17-40 F4/24-70 F2.8 II/85 F1.8/Canon 70-200 F2.8 II/F4/Sigma 30 DC/Tamron 150-600
Website (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Puckman
Cream of the Crop
6,311 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 2381
Joined Sep 2013
Location: Yorba Linda, CA
     
Aug 15, 2014 11:04 |  #340

IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

Looking for gold - Huntington Beach (external link) by Puckman2012 (external link), on Flickr

C&C appreciated. I don't usually convert to B&W, so I'm a bit new to that. Not entirely sure this is the best treatment for this one.

Sony A7RII and a bunch of lenses.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sirquack
Goldmember
Avatar
2,571 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 915
Joined Jan 2013
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
     
Aug 15, 2014 11:15 |  #341

You lost a lot of detail on her right side. If you could pull the detail out of the shadows, it would help. But that is about all I could suggest with my limited background.
I still have a hard time with B/W. I am trying a bit more of it lately, but still have a long way to go in that genre.


Name is Ron.
Bodies - 6D/5D3/7D2-Gripped
Lenses - Canon 17-40 F4/24-70 F2.8 II/85 F1.8/Canon 70-200 F2.8 II/F4/Sigma 30 DC/Tamron 150-600
Website (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Puckman
Cream of the Crop
6,311 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 2381
Joined Sep 2013
Location: Yorba Linda, CA
     
Aug 15, 2014 11:42 |  #342

Thanks. I'll try to re-process tonight.

In the meantime, in color, where I'm a lot more comfortable :)

IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

Surfing by the pier (external link) by Puckman2012 (external link), on Flickr

Sony A7RII and a bunch of lenses.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gossamer88
"something else"
Avatar
1,348 posts
Gallery: 79 photos
Likes: 1694
Joined Aug 2014
Location: NYC
     
Aug 15, 2014 12:23 |  #343

I'm also most comfortable with color. IMO, portraits benefit more from B/W than landscape does.


5D Mark IV | 7D Mark II | iPhone X | 70-200mm IS II | 100-400mm IS II | Sigma 150-600mm C
100mm 2.8 Macro | 85mm 1.8 | 50mm 1.8 STM | 35mm f/2 IS | 20mm 2.8 | 10-22mm USM

flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
16,218 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 6292
Joined Sep 2007
     
Aug 15, 2014 13:57 |  #344

IMAGE: https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3861/14741760850_acc5f3ac78_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/osFn​Uw  (external link) Daytime moon (external link) by charlie617 (external link), on Flickr

Sony A7riii/A9 - FE 12-24/4 - FE 24-240 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 28/2 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - EF 135/1.8 Art - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Astro Rok 14/2.8 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 RXD, 70-200/2.8 VC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sancho1983
Goldmember
Avatar
1,214 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 277
Joined Jan 2009
     
Aug 15, 2014 14:51 |  #345

I'm still contemplating a lens upgrade. I like the look of the 135L, but I think the 70-200 will give me more versatility. The f/4 non IS is out (not worth it IMO) and the 2.8 ISii is out (too expensive) - I think that I'd prefer the extra stops the f/2.8 has over the IS the f/4 would have (they are roughly the same price here)

But all in all, aside from the versatility, am I going to notice much of a difference/upgrade from my 85mm?


Instagram (external link)
www.bgsweddings.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

3,186,144 views & 18,519 likes for this thread
6D Owners Unite! Discuss and post Photos! (2)
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Photoguru1255
979 guests, 354 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.