


dankin Senior Member More info | Aug 22, 2014 06:48 | #2221 EOS R, 6d, 16-35 F4 IS, RF 24-105, 70-200 F4 IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pdrober2 Goldmember ![]() 2,318 posts Joined Nov 2010 Location: Durham, NC More info | Aug 22, 2014 11:39 | #2222 dankin wrote in post #17111003 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() nice shot. I assume this was the 14mm, what were your settings? Fujifilm X-T1 | 23 | 27 | 56 | 90 | 55-200
LOG IN TO REPLY |
babel_fish Goldmember ![]() 1,826 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2008 Location: Seattle More info | Aug 22, 2014 13:09 | #2223 Fernando wrote in post #17109988 ![]() My first post with my new X-T1 and the 35/1.4. The camera happened to be on the counter within reach when my daughter decided she wanted to attach herself to my foot. I didn't even check the settings since I didn't want that smile to disappear (it was 6:30AM). The shot is highly compressed here but I swear it was nice at the time. ![]()
"The time you enjoy wasting is not wasted time." -Bertrand Russell
LOG IN TO REPLY |
newporthomie Goldmember ![]() 4,175 posts Likes: 28 Joined Jun 2009 Location: Earth More info | Aug 22, 2014 13:37 | #2224 |
AltgnJoey Senior Member ![]() 885 posts Likes: 127 Joined Sep 2011 More info | Aug 22, 2014 17:47 | #2225 |
AltgnJoey Senior Member ![]() 885 posts Likes: 127 Joined Sep 2011 More info | Aug 22, 2014 20:21 | #2226 |
AZFiLM Member 155 posts Likes: 10 Joined Apr 2014 More info | Aug 22, 2014 22:51 | #2227 How well would an XT1 and 18-55 compare to a Canon 6D with a Tamron 24-70 f2.8? Are there any x-mount lenses that would be able to compare to the 70-200 focal length? Wheels are turning in my head lol.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
newporthomie Goldmember ![]() 4,175 posts Likes: 28 Joined Jun 2009 Location: Earth More info | Aug 23, 2014 02:42 | #2228
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 23, 2014 07:46 | #2229 AZFiLM wrote in post #17112548 ![]() How well would an XT1 and 18-55 compare to a Canon 6D with a Tamron 24-70 f2.8? Are there any x-mount lenses that would be able to compare to the 70-200 focal length? Wheels are turning in my head lol. probably the XF 50-140 OIS f/2.8 coming soon. It's roughly 75-210 equivalent, or thereabouts. Phillip - phillipwardphotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dankin Senior Member More info | Aug 23, 2014 11:39 | #2230 pdrober2 wrote in post #17111495 ![]() nice shot. I assume this was the 14mm, what were your settings? I used the 18-55 for that shot at 18mm. ISO 2000, 20 sec exposure at f2.8. The church was totally blown out at that exposure setting so I blended in another exposure for the building. EOS R, 6d, 16-35 F4 IS, RF 24-105, 70-200 F4 IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
newporthomie Goldmember ![]() 4,175 posts Likes: 28 Joined Jun 2009 Location: Earth More info | Aug 24, 2014 00:59 | #2231 |
newporthomie Goldmember ![]() 4,175 posts Likes: 28 Joined Jun 2009 Location: Earth More info | Aug 24, 2014 02:38 | #2232 |
EverydayGetaway Cream of the Crop ![]() More info | Aug 24, 2014 10:15 | #2233 Fuji X-Pro2 // Fuji X-H1 // Fuji X-T1 // Fuji X-100T
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 24, 2014 17:07 | #2234 ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ Shirley Valentine ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ Ian
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JawKnee5 Member 69 posts Likes: 3 Joined Feb 2013 Location: Southern California More info | Aug 25, 2014 04:45 | #2235 IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/oBsunJ ![]() ![]() ![]() flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
Latest registered member is Addisonadley 1002 guests, 323 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |