So right now I am shooting with a Canon t3i and tamron 17-50 vc f2.8 as my primary. I want to upgrade to a 6d and quality glass, and I will eventually. But I travel a lot for my work and the more poratbale the better. I will only be home about 3 months total the next year or so, which is making me rethink the 6d until I am home more.
So my new plan is to get a mirroless system with two fast primes to start off. But I am stuck on the a6000 from Sony and the Oly e-m10. From what I gather they would probably both be a step up in IQ from the t3i. But what I am shooting is mostly landscapes, a good ammount of low light and some spontaneous portraits. Budget is around 1500 because any more and I'll just start putting the money towards a 6d. Main reason for not getting the 6d is size during traveling and it would be a 3500-4000 investment for what I want. I like the idea of having a smaller body and a big ff rather than two dslrs.
Any thoughts to help quell my doubts? I am leaning towards the a6000 with the sigma 19mm and either the 50 or 35. But the olypus 45 is apparently amazing, it's really this lens that is holding me back. Just throwing all this out there to see what you guys think. I have been out of the gear game for the last 2 years.