Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre General Photography Talk 
Thread started 09 Sep 2014 (Tuesday) 07:58
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

What's your favourite 35mm Film stock?

 
Two ­ Hot ­ Shoes
Goldmember
Avatar
3,343 posts
Gallery: 346 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 3697
Joined Apr 2014
Location: Ireland
     
Sep 09, 2014 07:58 |  #1

I used to shoot with Kodak Gold & Ektar 100 a lot, yesterday I was rummaging through an old camera bag and found a unexposed role of Gold 100, guess it's been sitting in there for about 10 years. Naturally I popped it in a film camera and am shooting away (camera got a new battery too). Really loving it although I keep looking at the back of the camera after the shot. Ha!

Two questions:

1. Do you think the film will expose well?
2. What's your favourite 35mm Film stock?

Kim


Fujifilm cameras and lenses.
Gear List (external link)Instagram (external link)Blog (external link)
Coffee & Fujis (external link)About Capture One (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
PhotosGuy
Moderator
Avatar
75,877 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2528
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Sep 09, 2014 08:49 |  #2

Ten years might be OK. It depends on how it was stored in the bag. The color changes magenta to green as it ages. (Or the other way around -can't remember).


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kf095
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,507 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 278
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Canada, Ontario, Milton
     
Sep 09, 2014 09:03 as a reply to  @ PhotosGuy's post |  #3

1. I would expose it like ISO50.

2. None for favourite. Film is the sensor. Why limit yourself to the digital cameras concept where you have to deal with single sensor, where you could change the ISO, but can't change the "character".

Ko.


Old Site (external link). M-E and ME blog (external link). Film Flickr (external link). my DigitaL and AnaLog Gear.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
taemo
Goldmember
1,243 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Sep 2011
Location: Calgary, AB
     
Sep 09, 2014 09:11 |  #4

how to rate depends on how it was stored and film speed.
if it's been sitting in a shelf I would over-expose it by 1 or 2 stops, no need to compensate as much if fridge/freezer stored.
the faster the film, the more you'll have to compensate it.

going through a roll of expired Supra 400 and rated it to 100 then might push it one more stop in processing.

favorite 35mm film stock?
Neopan 400 - once I'm out, I'll switch to HP5+ or Delta 400
Gold 200 - once I'm out, I'll switch to Portra 160 or 400


earldieta.com (external link) - flickr (external link) - tumblr (external link) - gear/feedback
the spirit is willing but the body is sore and squishy
4 digital cameras | 14 film cameras

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MattPharmD
Senior Member
Avatar
255 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jun 2011
     
Sep 09, 2014 18:58 |  #5

Probably a weird one... Delta 3200. It is my absolute favorite for street photography.


Photography is just a hobby for me.
Twitter: @PharmNerdMatt (external link)
Youtube:The PharmNerd (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ltdave
Goldmember
3,417 posts
Gallery: 24 photos
Likes: 1868
Joined Apr 2012
Location: the farthest point east in michigan
     
Sep 09, 2014 19:06 as a reply to  @ MattPharmD's post |  #6

i havent shot film in close to 25 years (i took quite a break from photography back in the day) but i mostly used Ektachrome 100/400, VP-S III and MILES of Tri-X pan...

the VP-S was a little flat but i always though the colors were very creamy. maybe part of that was the 160 ASA speed...

the 'chrome was very acceptable when exposed properly. maybe it was just our processing (Air Force) but i liked everything about 1/3 under. we had a brown "wood grain" processor (machine) with a tray across the top front where the loaded film reels went. then you selected a plug in board for whatever film you were processing. we had the same thing when i worked for Gannett (if anyone can think of the name of the machine)...

Tri-X was just a little bit grainy back then but it was all journalism and newspaper reproduction so we used it...


we used Pan-X in 120 for officer portraits in case anyone is curious :D




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
airfrogusmc
I'm a chimper. There I said it...
36,321 posts
Gallery: 147 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 5696
Joined May 2007
Location: Oak Park, Illinois
     
Sep 09, 2014 19:32 |  #7

Tri-x now

In the day Kodachrome 25 professional 135, Kodachrome 64 120, Tri-x 320 professional sheet film.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
maverick75
Cream of the Crop
5,707 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 613
Joined May 2012
Location: Riverside,California
     
Sep 09, 2014 19:34 |  #8

Depends, for street Black and white I like Tri X 400, for portraits Tmax 400.

Color I like porta 160 for portaits and cheap fuji color 200 for street.


- Alex Corona Sony A7, Canon 7DM2/EOS M, Mamiya 645/67
Flickr (external link) - 500px (external link) - Website (external link)- Feedback -Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rgregoryb
Senior Member
Avatar
261 posts
Joined Jan 2012
     
Sep 09, 2014 20:54 |  #9

I used Fuji 160 ISO, can't remember the actual name


Leica D-LUX 4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 158
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Sep 09, 2014 21:37 |  #10

Overall, I'd say that Kodak Tri-X was my most-used film and I processed it with Microdol-X, normally diluted 1:3 with water.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BigAl007
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,009 posts
Gallery: 542 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1617
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Repps cum Bastwick, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK.
     
Sep 10, 2014 04:25 |  #11

Colour was probably Kodachrome 25 then 64. If I needed more speed then Ektachrome. I did also like Fujichrome as well. Although it was E6 I seem to remember it came process paid, so was expensive compared to the Kodak, especially as I was developing it at home. For monochrome I really liked Ilford FP4 for nice conditions, but also shot a lot of HP5 when ASA400 was needed. I mostly used Patterson branded developer (Acutol I think?) as well as using May & Baker products. There was a May & Baker factory near where I lived, and if I had not joined the RAF I was considering applying for a Lab technicians apprenticeship there.

Alan


My Flickr (external link)
My new Aviation images blog site (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

2,324 views & 0 likes for this thread
What's your favourite 35mm Film stock?
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Ezra Praveen
943 guests, 241 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.