Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff Photography Industry News 
Thread started 11 Sep 2014 (Thursday) 04:24
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Canon 7D MkII specs confirmed

 
this thread is locked
Gaarryy
Goldmember
Avatar
1,191 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 21
Joined Sep 2010
Location: The Colony-- texas
     
Sep 11, 2014 11:29 |  #46

gjl711 wrote in post #17148038 (external link)
I think the interesting spec is max ISO 16000. Has base ISO been increased to 125 or lowered to 75? A good sign that this may be a totally new sensor.

that and the IR Sensor, what ever that may be. if it's sensor driven or otherwise.

Thanks for adding on/answering on the fabrication process, I can never remember the details on that, just that it's an old process


---------------Camera, Lens, Flash stuff.. but still wanting more

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Shadowblade
Cream of the Crop
5,806 posts
Gallery: 26 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 401
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Sep 11, 2014 11:36 |  #47

myphotographic wrote in post #17148036 (external link)
While people will be disappointed it doesn't herald a sensor revolution, I reckon there is enough there now to put the 7D line clearly back on top of the APS-C tree. But I'm not sure there's sufficient improvement to keep it relevant until September 2019 for a 7DIII.

Top of the tree only if you don't care too much about image quality, and just want the best AF and other features available on a crop body.

That's only because Nikon hasn't updated the D300s since 2009, and doesn't look like it will do so any time soon.

Where image quality matters, I'd take the Sony/Nikon 24MP APS-C sensor over Canon's 20.2MP sensor any day.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Sep 11, 2014 11:40 |  #48

RWatkins wrote in post #17148068 (external link)
Given the rehashed 70D sensor, this better not be over 2K.

I have posted this in the past, so if it is the 70D sensor with a few tweaks, then I think the price has to fall down the evolutionary line in my diagram. Thus the 80D will then undoubtedly have something newer sensor-wise if the 7D2 doesn't. There are only 2 more xxD models that can be offered before the numbering has to radically change.

IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE]

Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elitejp
Goldmember
1,786 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 211
Joined Mar 2008
     
Sep 11, 2014 11:43 |  #49

travisvwright wrote in post #17147875 (external link)
There have been rumors some companies may soon come up with a slightly-magic complicated processes they put in that could potentially allow the user a select-able option that would control whether the wifi was on or not.

im still laughing :lol:


6D; canon 85mm 1.8, Tamron 24-70mm VC, Canon 135L Canon 70-200L is ii

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elitejp
Goldmember
1,786 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 211
Joined Mar 2008
     
Sep 11, 2014 11:46 |  #50

travisvwright wrote in post #17148012 (external link)
There have been rumors some companies may soon come up with a slightly-magic complicated processes they put in that could potentially allow the user a select-able option that would control whether the GPS was on or not.

oh man your killing me:lol:


6D; canon 85mm 1.8, Tamron 24-70mm VC, Canon 135L Canon 70-200L is ii

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
andrikos
Goldmember
Avatar
1,905 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
     
Sep 11, 2014 11:47 |  #51

TeamSpeed wrote in post #17148064 (external link)
It only costs about $40 to add remote wifi to the camera, even if it means adding a small attachment. For the casual buyer though, it would be disappointing. Touchscreen isn't necessary, but wifi is more so.

Of course all these are not "necessary", that's why they're called "wants".

Canon can spend $3 to add a wifi module like a billion smartphones already do.
It's not only a smart move, it makes Canon a bit more competitive and "future-proof".
Whether you like it or not, it's the future.
If you don't like it, don't use it.


Think new Canon lenses are overpriced? Lots (and lots) of data will set you free!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ptcanon3ti
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,057 posts
Gallery: 613 photos
Best ofs: 16
Likes: 11723
Joined Sep 2012
Location: NJ
     
Sep 11, 2014 12:00 |  #52

andrikos wrote in post #17148045 (external link)
BTW, all my above minor spec wants are moot if the sensor is not significantly upgraded DR/ISO wise.

This right here...


Paul
https://www.flickr.com​/photos/petshots/ (external link)
Body - Nikon D750
Lenses - Nikon 20 f1.8 / Nikon 16-35 f4 / Sigma 105 OS Macro / Sigma 24-105 f4 Art / Tamron 70-200 2.8 Di VC / Sigma 150-600 "S"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Sep 11, 2014 12:05 |  #53

andrikos wrote in post #17148113 (external link)
Of course all these are not "necessary", that's why they're called "wants".

Canon can spend $3 to add a wifi module like a billion smartphones already do.
It's not only a smart move, it makes Canon a bit more competitive and "future-proof".
Whether you like it or not, it's the future.
If you don't like it, don't use it.

It is no different than anything else with different model lines, they all off upgrades or feature packages that you pay for. Canon markets their cameras much like vehicles, if you want a feature set, you have to buy the upgraded model, whatever that is. Whether you like it or not, that is way the market works today in many areas. ;)

We have been down this road of discussions in the past about new models and their announcements, this is no different. This camera will sell very well, those that want a better build and better AF system with more FPS will buy the 7D2 over the 70D. If the ISO performance is better than the 70D, that will solidify those sales. I just wait for the reviews to see how well this system works out. I am disappointed over lack of wifi, but I can make due, I am a bit more concerned about how the resolution is nothing more than what the 70D had, and that wasn't even much a bump over the 5 year old 7D classic. I doubt that the ISO will be that much better either if there was no sensor changes. Those 2 things will cause me some pause. I will just spend $500-700 more and go back to a 1D4 probably.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BG ­ Ed
Member
Avatar
228 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 28
Joined Feb 2012
Location: Lexington KY USA
     
Sep 11, 2014 12:46 |  #54

Sensor question: Canon specs the 70D at a max ISO of 12800, so if the 7D II is rated up to 16000, is it therefore a new sensor? Or is there another way to increase the rated ISO of the sensor, if they are indeed using the exact same 70D sensor?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Shadowblade
Cream of the Crop
5,806 posts
Gallery: 26 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 401
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Sep 11, 2014 13:10 |  #55

BG Ed wrote in post #17148239 (external link)
Sensor question: Canon specs the 70D at a max ISO of 12800, so if the 7D II is rated up to 16000, is it therefore a new sensor? Or is there another way to increase the rated ISO of the sensor, if they are indeed using the exact same 70D sensor?

It can be done in software, or in off-sensor hardware.

Also, any change to the sensor makes it a 'new sensor', regardless of whether it improves image quality, reduces production cost, reduces heat production or power consumption or does something else altogether. A 'new sensor' isn't necessarily any better.

The 7D, 60D and a long line of Rebels all had 'new' 18MP sensors. They all produced the same image quality.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
"spouting off stupid things"
Avatar
57,707 posts
Likes: 4030
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Sep 11, 2014 13:14 |  #56

Shadowblade wrote in post #17148300 (external link)
It can be done in software, or in off-sensor hardware....

Usually when it is done is software, it's stated as such like the 70D being 100-12500 expanded to 25k.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
absolutic
Goldmember
Avatar
1,234 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 214
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Sherman Oaks, CA
     
Sep 11, 2014 13:19 |  #57

I think 7DM2 will be a runaway success for Canon. you get the 65-point-all-cross AF system from $6000 1DX in a $1799 camera. And by the way these points will probably cover the entire viewfinder/sensor because it is a crop view. So you will even be able to track by the corner of a screen. Times 10 frames per second. Couple that with the fastest af on planet in Canon USM lenses plus largest selection of lenses, and you have the camera with the best AF on planet for $1799. You can use it for any sports shooting, from kids to (outside) pro sports.


my youtube https://www.youtube.co​m …b_confirmation=​1%5B%2Furl (external link)
Latest POTN feedback https://photography-on-the.net …=15934524&postc​ount=39869
https://photography-on-the.net …=16930253&postc​ount=43618

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scottsoutter
Member
Avatar
202 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2013
Location: Portland, Oregon
     
Sep 11, 2014 13:22 |  #58

on the down side, with the release of the 7dii, what will legions of canon fans have to talk about?

September 22, 2014: 8d specifications leaked!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
absolutic
Goldmember
Avatar
1,234 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 214
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Sherman Oaks, CA
     
Sep 11, 2014 13:23 |  #59

scottsoutter wrote in post #17148333 (external link)
on the down side, with the release of the 7dii, what will legions of canon fans have to talk about?

September 22, 2014: 8d specifications leaked!

there is always an illusive 'high mp' body


my youtube https://www.youtube.co​m …b_confirmation=​1%5B%2Furl (external link)
Latest POTN feedback https://photography-on-the.net …=15934524&postc​ount=39869
https://photography-on-the.net …=16930253&postc​ount=43618

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bps
Cream of the Crop
7,607 posts
Likes: 406
Joined Mar 2007
Location: California
     
Sep 11, 2014 13:47 |  #60

mrgooch wrote in post #17147790 (external link)
It certainly will interest first time buyers.

It will interest a lot of other buyerss too. For example, I used to own a Canon 7D and then I sold it when I went full-frame. Now, a Canon 7D Mark II will be an awesome compliment to my existing set-up and needs. The extra reach of the crop sensor will be very handy for my bird photography and the 10 fps will be awesome for sports and action photography. Simply put, it will be a great tool to add to my arsenal of gear. I suspect many others will find the same usefulness too.

Bryan


My Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

51,501 views & 0 likes for this thread, 91 members have posted to it.
Canon 7D MkII specs confirmed
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff Photography Industry News 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
1172 guests, 132 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.