Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 18 Sep 2014 (Thursday) 16:22
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Going to plant a field just for portrait photography

 
Luckless
Goldmember
3,064 posts
Likes: 189
Joined Mar 2012
Location: PEI, Canada
     
Sep 19, 2014 09:56 |  #16

How about posting some photos (and note which direction they're facing) of the field you're planning to work with?


Canon EOS 7D | EF 28 f/1.8 | EF 85 f/1.8 | EF 70-200 f/4L | EF-S 17-55 | Sigma 150-500
Flickr: Real-Luckless (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Littlejon ­ Dsgn
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
3,266 posts
Likes: 905
Joined Feb 2012
Location: Sandy, Oregon
     
Sep 19, 2014 10:03 |  #17

Luckless wrote in post #17165172 (external link)
How about posting some photos (and note which direction they're facing) of the field you're planning to work with?

Thats a good idea, I will grab some pics this evening when I get home. Most of it is not much to look at, the majority of the new crop will go between some larger out buildings. I am also thinking I might plant a couple smaller fields of maybe just wild flowers and maybe a small one of sunflowers.

We do a good amount of boudoir so I am super excited to bring a bed out into the "field" so a lot of the images wont have skyline in it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Littlejon ­ Dsgn
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
3,266 posts
Likes: 905
Joined Feb 2012
Location: Sandy, Oregon
     
Sep 19, 2014 10:18 as a reply to  @ Littlejon Dsgn's post |  #18

Here is a Google Maps view of the property. The top of the image is North. Mt. Hood is East.

The light blue box is one area we can use, currently that is just open field

Yellow is where I am thinking of putting a wild flower patch, there will not be a lot of views from there but with the right composition it should work great.

The Red Box is another area we can use, the view east is blocked by the barn next to it, however if we plant far enough south we can shoot past the end of the building.

The Pink stripe is the building that has our studio in it.

The big chunck of crop are nursery stock trees. They will be pulled this winter and new planted come spring. The height ranges from nothing to 7' tall all summer long.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2014/09/3/LQ_695660.jpg
Image hosted by forum (695660) © Littlejon Dsgn [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
OhLook
insufferably pedantic. I can live with that.
Avatar
24,807 posts
Gallery: 105 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 16148
Joined Dec 2012
Location: California: SF Bay Area
     
Sep 19, 2014 10:53 |  #19

Corn grows tall enough to form its own background in a small area if planted densely. There are corn mazes.


PRONOUN ADVISORY: OhLook is a she. | A FEW CORRECT SPELLINGS: lens, aperture, amateur, hobbyist, per se, raccoon, whoa | Comments welcome

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Littlejon ­ Dsgn
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
3,266 posts
Likes: 905
Joined Feb 2012
Location: Sandy, Oregon
     
Sep 19, 2014 11:27 |  #20

I did not think about planting a couple rows of corn between the field and the barn, that is a great idea.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ Reichner
"That's what I do."
Avatar
17,607 posts
Gallery: 213 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8338
Joined Dec 2008
Location: from Pennsylvania, USA, now in Washington state, USA, road trip back and forth a lot
     
Sep 19, 2014 12:17 |  #21

Littlejon Dsgn wrote in post #17165038 (external link)
. . .some great views of Mt. Hood.

Well in that case I would want to take advantage of Mount Hood in the distance, and I think the best way to do that might be to keep it natural. Or at least natural-looking.

A wildflower meadow may be able to be done in such a way that it looks natural, and not cultivated. So you could photograph people in what appears to be a beautiful, natural setting with Mount Hood in the background.

Wildflower meadows are usually quite easy to grow, too, if you stick to mainly native species such as lupine, echinacea, indian paintbrush, balsam root, etc.


"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "moot point", NOT "mute point".

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Littlejon ­ Dsgn
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
3,266 posts
Likes: 905
Joined Feb 2012
Location: Sandy, Oregon
     
Sep 19, 2014 12:29 |  #22

Right now I am thinking I might go first to the blue part, and do an outer square of some tall grass/wheat or soemthing. And in the middle far enough in that I can shoot just the grass/wheat and not see if I did not want, plant a patch of flowers. Allowing me to have just wheat, what and flowers, just flowers with a wheat field behind.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ Reichner
"That's what I do."
Avatar
17,607 posts
Gallery: 213 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8338
Joined Dec 2008
Location: from Pennsylvania, USA, now in Washington state, USA, road trip back and forth a lot
     
Sep 19, 2014 12:36 |  #23

Littlejon Dsgn wrote in post #17163790 (external link)
So I am going to plant about a 3/4 acer field strictly for photography purposes.

Littlejon Dsgn wrote in post #17165215 (external link)
The light blue box is one area we can use, currently that is just open field

The blue and read areas look to be far, far smaller than 3/4 acre. By comparing it to the size of the houses, I would say they are each only 1/25th of an acre, at best.

Could you show us, on the Google Earth image, where the 3/4 acre size area is that you have to work with?

A 3/4 acre field allows for immensely more possibilities than an 1800 square foot plot.


"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "moot point", NOT "mute point".

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rral22
Senior Member
885 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Saskatchewan, Canada
     
Sep 19, 2014 12:56 |  #24

Why are you bothering? Aren't there already lots of "fields" planted with many different crops? Wouldn't it be cheaper to just ask permission from someone, and pay a bit for the use of his "set"?

You don't have to do the work. You don't have to pay the real costs. You get a variety of backgrounds at a variety of times. You can adapt your plan to the season, themes, and looks that you want.

Go for a drive and visit some farms before you go to any expense and effort to do your own. Do some real cost analysis.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Littlejon ­ Dsgn
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
3,266 posts
Likes: 905
Joined Feb 2012
Location: Sandy, Oregon
     
Sep 19, 2014 13:13 |  #25

Tom Reichner wrote in post #17165472 (external link)
The blue and read areas look to be far, far smaller than 3/4 acre. By comparing it to the size of the houses, I would say they are each only 1/25th of an acre, at best.

Could you show us, on the Google Earth image, where the 3/4 acre size area is that you have to work with?

A 3/4 acre field allows for immensely more possibilities than an 1800 square foot plot.

The blue area can be made much larger into the field that is already there, same with the red area it can be made the entire area and the barn to the east is no longer there.

rral22 wrote in post #17165515 (external link)
Why are you bothering? Aren't there already lots of "fields" planted with many different crops? Wouldn't it be cheaper to just ask permission from someone, and pay a bit for the use of his "set"?

You don't have to do the work. You don't have to pay the real costs. You get a variety of backgrounds at a variety of times. You can adapt your plan to the season, themes, and looks that you want.

Go for a drive and visit some farms before you go to any expense and effort to do your own. Do some real cost analysis.

In my area everything is either Christmas trees or nursery stock trees which are very thin and look very plain. If any cover crop is planted it is very unpredictable and twice I have had shoots planned only to come home to a plowed over field.

Most of what I am looking for should require some work up front, and then limited after.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Acetoolguy
Senior Member
Avatar
432 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 139
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Buzzards Bay MA
     
Sep 22, 2014 06:30 as a reply to  @ Littlejon Dsgn's post |  #26

It looks big enough to have small patch's of blooming flowers in different sections the whole season if you wanted.
Though you may have to change to a gardener who also takes photos.


Never use a paragraph when a sentence will do.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
whuband
Goldmember
Avatar
1,433 posts
Likes: 84
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
     
Sep 22, 2014 14:49 |  #27

I'd go with whatever the government is paying farmers not to plant, use the money for a new camera and look for scenic backgrounds elsewhere. No work involved :-)


1D4, 6D, 7D2, Sony a6000 with Sony16-70, Rokinon 12mmf2, Canon lenses: 17-40L, 17-55 f2.8, 10-22, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.8, 70-200mm IS 2.8, 300mm 2.8 IS, 580EXII (3), 430EX, Alien Bees.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Didereaux
Senior Member
Avatar
415 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 256
Joined Jun 2014
Location: Upper Texas coast
     
Sep 22, 2014 17:00 |  #28

Littlejon Dsgn wrote in post #17163809 (external link)
I was honestly thinking more like a wheat field, I thought about a small patch of sunflowers since they are only around for a short time. I had not thought about doing a tall grass with wildflowers tossed in that might look good.

Watering is not a huge issue, however something that requires little to non is even better.

For a long lasting, picturesque grass/corn effect I would plant a small patch of Pearl (cattail) millet. It grows about 6 feet tall. If you can''t find a seed source buy some all-around birdseed mix. The millet is the small golden round seeds in it. Also (and we have done this in the back yard bird garden) just scatter a couple handfuls of the mix stomp it it, water it and voila a really nice patch of varied plants.

Always plant in 1-2 week stages so that you have a varied look with different stages of maturity. Someday I really should take a shot of our little patch.

ha! you made me run out back and take the shot. (small jpeg critique not needed lol)
The millet is the tall ggrassy/cattail stuff on the left side of the feeder.

IMAGE: https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-aZ9JIZejqSI/VCChW_2UkvI/AAAAAAAAD6Q/U0G9wy3PON4/s800/IMGL0615.jpg

Couple of Canon bodies, a couple of Canon lens, few gadgets all stuffed in a bag...and a stick, and a tripod.
https://www.flickr.com …ringandmontepho​tos/albums (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony_Stark
Shellhead
Avatar
4,287 posts
Likes: 350
Joined May 2010
Location: Toronto, Canada
     
Sep 22, 2014 17:46 |  #29

A field of Poppies will look amazing, and you can make some secondary income off of it!


Nikon D810 | 24-70/2.8G | 58/1.4G
EOS M | 22 f/2 STM

Website (external link) | flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Karl ­ Johnston
Cream of the Crop
9,334 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jul 2008
     
Sep 22, 2014 17:51 |  #30
bannedPermanent ban

How about a fruit orchard ?

Or lavender rows. I think that would be cool

If you start to do commercial or stock, however, I would like to have an orchard on hand, to make for some unique agricultural/grocery specialized images.


Adventurous Photographer, Writer (external link) & Wedding Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,140 views & 0 likes for this thread, 18 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
Going to plant a field just for portrait photography
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
1494 guests, 123 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.