kfreels Goldmember  4,297 posts Likes: 7 Joined Aug 2010 Location: Princeton, IN More info | Sep 25, 2014 21:23 | #1 I am serious....and don't call me Shirley.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
M_Six Cream of the Crop  More info | Sep 25, 2014 21:57 | #2 Even though it appears this rule applies only to media pros and not your average citizen hiker, it's still stupidity writ large. Photojournalists are taxpayers, too. Taxpayers whose taxes help pay the salaries of the bozos who crafted this rule. Mark J.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PeteD Goldmember  2,953 posts Likes: 1152 Joined Apr 2010 Location: North Carolina More info | Sep 25, 2014 21:58 | #3 Wow. That's crazy. Thanks for sharing I don't suffer from insanity. I enjoy it!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TooManyShots Cream of the Crop 10,203 posts Likes: 531 Joined Jan 2008 Location: NYC More info | Sep 25, 2014 22:21 | #4  Permanent banThis country is getting stupid by the minute...hehehe... I don't live near to any of the major national parks and so.....not sure if I can or should do anything about it... One Imaging Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tkbslc Cream of the Crop 24,604 posts Likes: 43 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Utah, USA More info | Sep 25, 2014 22:40 | #5 M_Six wrote in post #17178071  Even though it appears this rule applies only to media pros and not your average citizen hiker, it's still stupidity writ large. Photojournalists are taxpayers, too. Taxpayers whose taxes help pay the salaries of the bozos who crafted this rule. There are a lot more of us who go to the parks to enjoy them without tripping over people filming. Those "bozos" made the rules to protect the parks for us. Taylor
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DavidArbogast Cream of the Crop  More info | Sep 25, 2014 22:42 | #6 That is horrifying. It is incomprehensibile to me. Is this just in the proposal stage, or is it in effect. David | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PhotosGuy Cream of the Crop  More info | Sep 25, 2014 23:03 | #7 Everybody calm down. From the other thread: tandemhearts wrote in post #17176657 Forest Service Wildernesses are not National Parks. It specifically excludes "noncommercial still photography". FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DavidArbogast Cream of the Crop More info | Sep 25, 2014 23:13 | #8 Seems like a lot of misinformation going on. David | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TomReichner "That's what I do."  16,865 posts Gallery: 196 photos Best ofs: 2 Likes: 7471 Joined Dec 2008 Location: from Pennsylvania, USA, now in Washington state, USA, road trip back and forth a lot More info | Sep 26, 2014 00:57 | #9 I hope that folks understand that this law only applies to Designated Wilderness Areas, not the non-designated portions of national forests, and not the non-designated portions national parks. The headline is really mis-information, as it leads people to believe that you won't be allowed to take photos in National Forests, which is not the case at all. "Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
watt100 Cream of the Crop 14,021 posts Likes: 34 Joined Jun 2008 More info | Sep 26, 2014 05:13 | #10 Tom Reichner wrote in post #17178217 I hope that folks understand that this law only applies to Designated Wilderness Areas, not the non-designated portions of national forests, and not the non-designated portions national parks. The headline is really mis-information, as it leads people to believe that you won't be allowed to take photos in National Forests, which is not the case at all. right but what happens when it extends to national parks
LOG IN TO REPLY |
groundloop Senior Member 990 posts Likes: 37 Joined Jun 2012 More info | Sep 26, 2014 06:26 | #11 watt100 wrote in post #17178408 right but what happens when it extends to national parks The rule only applies to commercial filming, the article everyone is talking about did a horrible job of presenting facts (kinda' seems like the author wanted to stir up a hornets nest).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kf095 Out buying Wheaties  More info | Sep 26, 2014 07:26 | #12 I understand why vandals cut their names on trees with capitals. But I don't know why it is needed here. Old Site
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gonzogolf dumb remark memorialized More info | Sep 26, 2014 07:31 | #13 watt100 wrote in post #17178408 right but what happens when it extends to national parks What makes you think it will?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
joedlh Cream of the Crop  5,462 posts Gallery: 51 photos Likes: 627 Joined Dec 2007 Location: Long Island, NY, N. America, Sol III, Orion Spur, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Cluster, Laniakea. More info | The idea of the permit process is to make sure that the commercial crew has the proper insurance and to determine to what extent it might interfere with the public. Also to clean up after yourself. You can't film in NYC without a permit. While wilderness areas don't have a lot of people around, a large crew can have an impact on the ecological balance. Wilderness areas are declared as such in order to preserve the wilderness. Joe
LOG IN TO REPLY |
moose10101 registered smartass More info | Sep 26, 2014 08:15 | #15 joedlh wrote in post #17178576 The idea of the permit process is to make sure that the commercial crew has the proper insurance and to determine to what extent it might interfere with the public. Also to clean up after yourself. Hasn't that permit process for commercial shoots been in place for National Parks for years? I don't see what the problem is.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
| Latest registered member is Coolbawncross 680 guests, 218 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
