I am wanting to buy a prime lens:
in your opinion which is the 'most versatile' 35 - 50 or 85?
I know this is a fairly wide open question - i mainly shoot landscape and children
AuntieMegan Hatchling 8 posts Joined Apr 2014 More info | Oct 14, 2014 16:43 | #1 I am wanting to buy a prime lens:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 14, 2014 16:47 | #2 What camera(s) do you have? Are they APS-C or full-frame? What do you have now? If they are zooms, what focal lengths you most commonly use? Canon 80D, 60D, Canon 10-22EFs, 15-85EFS IS, Sigma 100-400, Sigma 135/1.8ART, Sigma 30mm f/1.4DC, Canon 60mm EFs Macro, Rokinon 8mm fisheye, 550EX flash, Olympus TG6 underwater P&S
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bubbygator I can't tell the difference 1,477 posts Gallery: 1 photo Likes: 63 Joined Feb 2011 Location: Sarasota, sunlight, butterflies, fish, Gators, and Seminoles More info | Oct 14, 2014 18:09 | #3 35 is good for medium landscapes and still children. But you need the expensive f/1.4 to capture fast moving kids. The 50/1.8 is cheap, usable, but limited for landscape use. The 85/1.8 is great for fast kids (or other fast action)... but for landscape it would only be useful for relatively far shots. Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 14, 2014 18:14 | #4 I hardly ever use my 50, a 35 would probably be my most used if I had primes (I use 24-70 for most of my photography) and the 85 is fantastic for portraits but otherwise I'd also not get much use out of it I think. Any particular reason you want a prime, and what do you have in lenses right now? 40D, 5D3, a bunch of lenses and other things
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 14, 2014 20:31 | #5 Permanent banMost versatile prime? Oxymoron. If you want versatile, shoot a zoom. If you want to do something specific, buy the prime that accomplishes your mission. If you don't have a mission, it is cheaper to stick with the zoom. Of course, if you want a prime, just pick one and go with it. Fast primes open up a whole new world. I have been acquiring used primes for about a year. So far I have: 28 1.8, 35 IS, 50 1.4, and 100 2. I really like the 28 and 100 on full-frame, and the 35 on crop, but I use all of them on both formats. WARNING: I often dispense advice in fields I know little about!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 14, 2014 20:46 | #6 My 50 is my walk around lens and I love it. However, at times I feel that the 35 would be beneficial more-so. This is why I purchased a 24-70.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 14, 2014 20:59 | #7 Permanent banhang your cross wrote in post #17213296 My 50 is my walk around lens and I love it. However, at times I feel that the 35 would be beneficial more-so. This is why I purchased a 24-70. I have a 35 IS and a 50 1.4. The 50 gets used more on crop than on full-frame. I love the 35 on 6D. No interest in any flavor of 24-70. WARNING: I often dispense advice in fields I know little about!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
EverydayGetaway Cream of the Crop More info | Oct 15, 2014 10:43 | #8 This depends entirely on who you ask... for my, 50mm (or it's FF equivalent) is my preferred focal length. Fuji X-T3 // Fuji X-Pro2 (Full Spectrum) // Fuji X-H1 // Fuji X-T1
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 15, 2014 11:24 | #9 GeoKras1989 wrote in post #17213271 Most versatile prime? Oxymoron. If you want versatile, shoot a zoom. If you want to do something specific, buy the prime that accomplishes your mission. If you don't have a mission, it is cheaper to stick with the zoom. Of course, if you want a prime, just pick one and go with it. Fast primes open up a whole new world. I have been acquiring used primes for about a year. So far I have: 28 1.8, 35 IS, 50 1.4, and 100 2. I really like the 28 and 100 on full-frame, and the 35 on crop, but I use all of them on both formats. Not true. A 50mm 1.2 lens is much more versatile in dark locations than any zoom Sony A7RII | Sony A7S
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 15, 2014 12:07 | #10 Permanent bandavidfarina wrote in post #17214229 Not true. A 50mm 1.2 lens is much more versatile in dark locations than any zoom ![]() Being specifically useful in one situation is exactly the opposite of versatile. Having the ability to do one thing well is not versatile. How is your 50L at wide landscapes, distant wildlife, AF tracking in something like basketball or ice hockey? The 50L may be a lot of things: fast, excellent, slow-focusing, sharp across the frame, weather sealed, minimal distortion, CA and vignetting. None of that makes it versatile. That just makes it good. Which is not a bad thing. If I could afford one, I wouldn't own a 50 1.4. WARNING: I often dispense advice in fields I know little about!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
1duser Mostly Lurking 14 posts Joined Aug 2010 More info | Oct 15, 2014 12:21 | #11 50 is the most versatile. Get 50 or 35 and 85. 5Dc | Nex-5N | Lumia 1020
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 15, 2014 15:26 | #12 I guessing based on your other 3 posts that you have a 24-105 and either a 6D or 5D3 now. I would run a program called exposure plot, which can be downloaded for free, on your current photo folder and see what focal length you use most. Everyone here is going to have a different opinion that might not meet your needs. Use actual data and your decision will match your needs far better than we can predict. Canon 7D/350D, Σ17-50/2.8 OS, 18-55IS, 24-105/4 L IS, Σ30/1.4 EX, 50/1.8, C50/1.4, 55-250IS, 60/2.8, 70-200/4 L IS, 85/1.8, 100/2.8 IS L, 135/2 L 580EX II, 430EX II * 2, 270EX II.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 15, 2014 15:44 | #13 Permanent banFEChariot wrote in post #17214677 I guessing based on your other 3 posts that you have a 24-105 and either a 6D or 5D3 now. I would run a program called exposure plot, which can be downloaded for free, on your current photo folder and see what focal length you use most. Everyone here is going to have a different opinion that might not meet your needs. Use actual data and your decision will match your needs far better than we can predict. Or you can just look at your apertures in Lightroom, if you have it. WARNING: I often dispense advice in fields I know little about!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 15, 2014 15:47 | #14 GeoKras1989 wrote in post #17214716 Or you can just look at your apertures in Lightroom, if you have it. He is talking about something different. Not aperture.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 15, 2014 15:47 | #15 sorry, I should have been more specific..
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is griggt 636 guests, 125 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||