Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 14 Oct 2014 (Tuesday) 16:43
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

new lens

 
Auntie ­ Megan
Hatchling
8 posts
Joined Apr 2014
     
Oct 14, 2014 16:43 |  #1

I am wanting to buy a prime lens:

in your opinion which is the 'most versatile' 35 - 50 or 85?

I know this is a fairly wide open question - i mainly shoot landscape and children




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RodneyCyr
Senior Member
683 posts
Gallery: 31 photos
Likes: 146
Joined Feb 2005
Location: New Mexico, USA
     
Oct 14, 2014 16:47 |  #2

What camera(s) do you have? Are they APS-C or full-frame? What do you have now? If they are zooms, what focal lengths you most commonly use?

Get a prime that matches your favorite focal lengths.


Canon 80D, 60D, Canon 10-22EFs, 15-85EFS IS, Sigma 100-400, Sigma 135/1.8ART, Sigma 30mm f/1.4DC, Canon 60mm EFs Macro, Rokinon 8mm fisheye, 550EX flash, Olympus TG6 underwater P&S
Postprocessing: DxOLabs 5, DxO Viewpoint 3, Paint Shop Pro 2021
Speak softly and carry a big zoom.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bubbygator
I can't tell the difference
Avatar
1,477 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 63
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Sarasota, sunlight, butterflies, fish, Gators, and Seminoles
     
Oct 14, 2014 18:09 |  #3

35 is good for medium landscapes and still children. But you need the expensive f/1.4 to capture fast moving kids. The 50/1.8 is cheap, usable, but limited for landscape use. The 85/1.8 is great for fast kids (or other fast action)... but for landscape it would only be useful for relatively far shots.

Then there is the 18-135/3.5-5.6, a kit zoom with a fairly wide usability ... as long as there's enough light.


Gear List
The avatar is my middle grandson. (the TF can't tell the difference, but the fish is frowning and the kid is grinning)
Sarasota, sunlight, butterflies, fish, Gators, and Seminoles

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
phantelope
Goldmember
Avatar
1,889 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 40
Joined Sep 2008
Location: NorCal
     
Oct 14, 2014 18:14 |  #4

I hardly ever use my 50, a 35 would probably be my most used if I had primes (I use 24-70 for most of my photography) and the 85 is fantastic for portraits but otherwise I'd also not get much use out of it I think. Any particular reason you want a prime, and what do you have in lenses right now?


40D, 5D3, a bunch of lenses and other things :cool:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GeoKras1989
Goldmember
Avatar
4,038 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 262
Joined Jun 2014
     
Oct 14, 2014 20:31 |  #5
bannedPermanent ban

Most versatile prime? Oxymoron. If you want versatile, shoot a zoom. If you want to do something specific, buy the prime that accomplishes your mission. If you don't have a mission, it is cheaper to stick with the zoom. Of course, if you want a prime, just pick one and go with it. Fast primes open up a whole new world. I have been acquiring used primes for about a year. So far I have: 28 1.8, 35 IS, 50 1.4, and 100 2. I really like the 28 and 100 on full-frame, and the 35 on crop, but I use all of them on both formats.


WARNING: I often dispense advice in fields I know little about!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hang ­ your ­ cross
Senior Member
Avatar
729 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 76
Joined Dec 2013
Location: Clayton, NC
     
Oct 14, 2014 20:46 |  #6

My 50 is my walk around lens and I love it. However, at times I feel that the 35 would be beneficial more-so. This is why I purchased a 24-70.


Some of my feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GeoKras1989
Goldmember
Avatar
4,038 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 262
Joined Jun 2014
     
Oct 14, 2014 20:59 |  #7
bannedPermanent ban

hang your cross wrote in post #17213296 (external link)
My 50 is my walk around lens and I love it. However, at times I feel that the 35 would be beneficial more-so. This is why I purchased a 24-70.

I have a 35 IS and a 50 1.4. The 50 gets used more on crop than on full-frame. I love the 35 on 6D. No interest in any flavor of 24-70.


WARNING: I often dispense advice in fields I know little about!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EverydayGetaway
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,007 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 5394
Joined Oct 2012
Location: GA Mountains
     
Oct 15, 2014 10:43 |  #8

This depends entirely on who you ask... for my, 50mm (or it's FF equivalent) is my preferred focal length.


Fuji X-T3 // Fuji X-Pro2 (Full Spectrum) // Fuji X-H1 // Fuji X-T1
flickr (external link) // Instagram (external link)www.LucasGPhoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davidfarina
Goldmember
Avatar
3,352 posts
Gallery: 43 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 1028
Joined May 2013
     
Oct 15, 2014 11:24 |  #9

GeoKras1989 wrote in post #17213271 (external link)
Most versatile prime? Oxymoron. If you want versatile, shoot a zoom. If you want to do something specific, buy the prime that accomplishes your mission. If you don't have a mission, it is cheaper to stick with the zoom. Of course, if you want a prime, just pick one and go with it. Fast primes open up a whole new world. I have been acquiring used primes for about a year. So far I have: 28 1.8, 35 IS, 50 1.4, and 100 2. I really like the 28 and 100 on full-frame, and the 35 on crop, but I use all of them on both formats.

Not true. A 50mm 1.2 lens is much more versatile in dark locations than any zoom ;-)a


Sony A7RII | Sony A7S
EF 40 | EF 70-300L | FD 35 Tilt-Shift
FE 16-35 | FE 28 | FE 90
CV 15 4.5 III | CV 40 1.4 MC | Summilux 50 ASPH
Website (external link) | 500px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GeoKras1989
Goldmember
Avatar
4,038 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 262
Joined Jun 2014
     
Oct 15, 2014 12:07 |  #10
bannedPermanent ban

davidfarina wrote in post #17214229 (external link)
Not true. A 50mm 1.2 lens is much more versatile in dark locations than any zoom ;-)a

Being specifically useful in one situation is exactly the opposite of versatile. Having the ability to do one thing well is not versatile. How is your 50L at wide landscapes, distant wildlife, AF tracking in something like basketball or ice hockey? The 50L may be a lot of things: fast, excellent, slow-focusing, sharp across the frame, weather sealed, minimal distortion, CA and vignetting. None of that makes it versatile. That just makes it good. Which is not a bad thing. If I could afford one, I wouldn't own a 50 1.4.


WARNING: I often dispense advice in fields I know little about!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
1duser
Mostly Lurking
14 posts
Joined Aug 2010
     
Oct 15, 2014 12:21 |  #11

50 is the most versatile. Get 50 or 35 and 85.


5Dc | Nex-5N | Lumia 1020

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FEChariot
Goldmember
Avatar
4,427 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 347
Joined Sep 2011
     
Oct 15, 2014 15:26 |  #12

I guessing based on your other 3 posts that you have a 24-105 and either a 6D or 5D3 now. I would run a program called exposure plot, which can be downloaded for free, on your current photo folder and see what focal length you use most. Everyone here is going to have a different opinion that might not meet your needs. Use actual data and your decision will match your needs far better than we can predict.


Canon 7D/350D, Σ17-50/2.8 OS, 18-55IS, 24-105/4 L IS, Σ30/1.4 EX, 50/1.8, C50/1.4, 55-250IS, 60/2.8, 70-200/4 L IS, 85/1.8, 100/2.8 IS L, 135/2 L 580EX II, 430EX II * 2, 270EX II.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GeoKras1989
Goldmember
Avatar
4,038 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 262
Joined Jun 2014
     
Oct 15, 2014 15:44 |  #13
bannedPermanent ban

FEChariot wrote in post #17214677 (external link)
I guessing based on your other 3 posts that you have a 24-105 and either a 6D or 5D3 now. I would run a program called exposure plot, which can be downloaded for free, on your current photo folder and see what focal length you use most. Everyone here is going to have a different opinion that might not meet your needs. Use actual data and your decision will match your needs far better than we can predict.

Or you can just look at your apertures in Lightroom, if you have it.


WARNING: I often dispense advice in fields I know little about!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hang ­ your ­ cross
Senior Member
Avatar
729 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 76
Joined Dec 2013
Location: Clayton, NC
     
Oct 15, 2014 15:47 |  #14

GeoKras1989 wrote in post #17214716 (external link)
Or you can just look at your apertures in Lightroom, if you have it.

He is talking about something different. Not aperture.


Some of my feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Auntie ­ Megan
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
8 posts
Joined Apr 2014
     
Oct 15, 2014 15:47 |  #15

sorry, I should have been more specific..
i have a 5Dmk3 and a 24-105L

the 24-105L is a beautiful lens for good light - but the f4 is limiting.

i was set to go for the 50L 1.2 but wary of the negative comments re focussing.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,440 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
new lens
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
636 guests, 125 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.