5D3 is in a whole different league.
not only is the noise better, but it retains more detail as well.
Oct 31, 2014 13:31 | #16 5D3 is in a whole different league. Sony A7siii/A7iii/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Snydremark my very own Lightrules moment More info | Oct 31, 2014 13:44 | #17 WhidbeyHiker wrote in post #17243950  Tells me that I need a used 7D or MKiii. Not that there is anything wrong with the 7d2. I have two 7D MkIs and will likely be looking to offload one now that the MkII's in the stable. Let me know if you'd be interested, since we're local it would be an easy trade - Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeamSpeed 01010100 01010011  More info | Oct 31, 2014 14:15 | #18 Snydremark wrote in post #17244090 I have two 7D MkIs and will likely be looking to offload one now that the MkII's in the stable. Let me know if you'd be interested, since we're local it would be an easy trade  Besides, I'm always up for a trip to Whidbey... Don't trade mine away.... it was a good one. Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
moltengold Goldmember 4,296 posts Likes: 9 Joined Jul 2011 More info | Oct 31, 2014 14:31 | #19 nice Comparison with the ISO | Canon EOS | and some canon lenses
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 31, 2014 14:45 | #20 Anyone know if there's been a comparison between the 1DIV and 7DII? Seeing as 7D2+grip is almost as much as a 1DIV... A7RIII | EF15/2.8 FE | 16-35/4.0LIS | 24/1.4L II | ZA55/1.8 | 24-105G OSS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeamSpeed 01010100 01010011 More info | Oct 31, 2014 14:47 | #21 moltengold wrote in post #17244176 nice Comparison with the ISO but why they don't make a Comparison with some macro lenses to see how these cameras can show the tiny details I hope they do this with the MP-E 65 Macro lens with a macro flash Detail is detail whether its macro on a flower that you go in at 100% or dust on a light switch with a regular lens. Not sure why a macro would produce a different result, you just get different material than what you might be used to. Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Phoenixkh a mere speck More info | Oct 31, 2014 14:54 | #22 OK... this convinced me that I need a 5D Mk iii or 1D X plus an 800L to shoot birds. Kim (the male variety) Canon 1DX2 | 1D IV | 16-35 f/4 IS | 24-105 f/4 IS | 100L IS macro | 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II | 100-400Lii | 50 f/1.8 STM | Canon 1.4X III
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 31, 2014 15:00 | #23 TeamSpeed wrote in post #17244206 To me, on these samples, it just looks like that the 70D is more sharpened for some reason? The noise is starting to approach that mazing look. All the photos were processed with exactly the same DPP settings. In the case of sharpness, I had Raw Sharpness = 3 and RGB Sharpness = 0. My exercise was done for the purpose of comparing ISO noise, not comparing detail. Given that purpose, I saw what I wanted to see. Image editing ok; C&C always welcome.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Snydremark my very own Lightrules moment More info | Oct 31, 2014 15:42 | #24 If it's going to be someone's main body, why wouldn't they want the good one? - Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Paulstw Senior Member 827 posts Likes: 2 Joined Nov 2012 More info | Oct 31, 2014 15:53 | #25 Yeah I'll be hanging on to my 5D3. Thanks for the test. Looks like if I want speed, IQ and good noise control, Canon have me by the short and curlys and it's got to be a 1Dx, unless there's a 7D2 vs 1DIV test round the corner.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Peter2516 Cream of the Crop  More info | Oct 31, 2014 15:57 | #26 Snydremark wrote in post #17244329 If it's going to be someone's main body, why wouldn't they want the good one? Eric you have 2 7D? That is 7DII Peter
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Weja Goldmember  More info | Oct 31, 2014 16:51 | #27 fiebru1119 wrote in post #17244203 Anyone know if there's been a comparison between the 1DIV and 7DII? Seeing as 7D2+grip is almost as much as a 1DIV... 1D iv iso 3200  7D ii iso 3200  Look at the details and you know enough. Weja Canon gear:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeamSpeed 01010100 01010011 More info | Oct 31, 2014 20:40 | #28 Cannot tell which lenses were used in those test shots. Same lens, and one that can resolve to a high density sensor? Probably not. This is why I gave up on those, I got just enough info regarding ISO performance from the raw, but cannot use anything there regarding detail. The 7D2 will be pretty close once you crop out the 1D4 and resize it up to the 7D2 shot. Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pcunite Goldmember  1,478 posts Likes: 3 Joined Apr 2007 More info | Oct 31, 2014 22:39 | #29 TeamSpeed wrote in post #17244754 Cannot tell which lenses were used in those test shots. Same lens, and one that can resolve to a high density sensor? Probably not. This is why I gave up on those ... Agreed. There is a lens issues here. The 7D II is not that bad.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Canon7DDSLR Senior Member  407 posts Joined Nov 2009 Location: The Paradise More info | Oct 31, 2014 23:57 | #30 if it is the same lens... 1D mkiv is much better!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
| Latest registered member is jdvann 982 guests, 316 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
R5, 5D IV, 600mm. F4 L IS II ,100/400 L IS II, 100 F2.8 L IS , 1.4 Tc.III , 2.0 Tc. III, 