-= 7D2 owners unite! Discuss and post photos!

Some more shots

American Coot

PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER. Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries. Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page. http://i980.photobucke​t.com …ican-Coot-21.jpg~original

PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER. Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries. Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page. http://i980.photobucke​t.com …ared-Grebe-9.jpg~original

PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER. Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries. Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page. http://i980.photobucke​t.com …s/Mallard-41.jpg~original

PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER. Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries. Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page. http://i980.photobucke​t.com …Merganser-23.jpg~original

PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER. Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries. Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page. http://i980.photobucke​t.com …now-Goose-10.jpg~original

PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER. Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries. Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page. http://i980.photobucke​t.com …lled-Gull-23.jpg~original

PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER. Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries. Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page. http://i980.photobucke​t.com …ada-Goose-43.jpg~original

nice shots John

Thank you Gabe. This camera sure makes them easier to come by if you keep your technique solid. I think my 100-400L ges along better with this camera than my 7D1.

Archibald wrote in post #17266569
I would shoot raw + jpg for now. I doubt anyone could tell the difference between an edited in-camera jpg and a TIF from DPP, except for high dynamic range subjects, at least in Lightroom. When Adobe comes out with the 7D2 raw interpreter, you can go back to the CR2 files if necessary.

TIF files have a big advantage when repeatedly re-editing, but Lightroom doesn't do that to files.

That's exactly what I've been doing

Aressem wrote in post #17266594
That's exactly what I've been doing

Same here. I zero out NR, sharpening and ALO. I add the Lens Optimizer, adjust WB and exposure then convert to tiffs and process in PS CC.

Great birds there, John! I've never seen a juvi Snow Goose before

Thanks Eric. It is a first for me. The first Snow geese I saw were from a distance of 1/4 mile or greater. I saw one this weekend from a distance of about 100 yds. Then this juvi from about 30 yds. I had a good idea it was a Snow Goose since we had a large amount of them go through last night but the colors were not what I expected so to Sibley's I went.

Give us a few months and come up to the PNW; we can get you closer than 30ft

ptcanon3ti wrote in post #17266314
Thats really is a good question. I can't imagine why Adobe is dragging it's feet on getting an update out to cover such a popular camera...along with the D750. Seems very odd.

Adobes too busy trying to figure out how to squeeze you for more money via a forced LR subscription plan to worry about coding for a new RAW standard.

2n10 wrote in post #17266582
Some more shots

Wow, these look great!

As far as Canon are concerned they bundle a perfectly good RAW converter in with their cameras. Adobe probably need Canon advice or guidance to translate the RAW data from the new camera (I dunno) and maybe Canon are being difficult. Just because we are multi-product in our daily lives, doesn't mean that these big companies like playing ball with each other.

Great stuff john, I'm still thinking the jpeg will do just fine for the small time we need to wait

This Hairy is a jpeg run through lightroom,... Im thinkin the fine detail is just fine. I left the noise reduction sliders at zero

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/p5ZU​Z8

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/pZpA​Cw

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/pK2p​Gd

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/pJZv​3t

^^^^^^Hard to pick a favorite, but I would say #2 or #3

BTW, this thread is like a drug, I'm addicted!!!!

lol I can tell you I am. Truth is I can tell you John is as well.

That hairy shot is probably one of the best OOC jpg results (at 100%) I have seen yet to date. As to the noise, it really isn't bad, even with the camera sharpening being applied. Nothing that would show up in a print anyways. Great!

What is odd, is how far off the 2nd shot is to the first, though. The details are more harsh and the subject material isn't quite in the same focus as the hairy. Were picture style settings changed between the different shots perhaps?