Even though this lens isn't fast as an f2.8 lens, depending on what you shoot, I think it still produces very nice bokeh.
Packard Swan
by navydoc45, on Flickr
navydoc Cream of the Crop  More info | Jan 20, 2015 11:26 | #46 Even though this lens isn't fast as an f2.8 lens, depending on what you shoot, I think it still produces very nice bokeh. Packard Swan by navydoc45, on FlickrGene - My Photo Gallery ||
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DavidArbogast Cream of the Crop  More info Post edited over 8 years ago by David Arbogast. | Jan 20, 2015 11:45 | #47 navydoc wrote in post #17391337 Even though this lens isn't fast as an f2.8 lens, depending on what you shoot, I think it still produces very nice bokeh. Packard Swan by navydoc45, on FlickrNice! The bokeh looks very good to me. David | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 20, 2015 15:58 | #48 Very pleased with the BG blur;  Image hosted by forum (708837) © Zethar [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. 1DX, 1DIV, 5DIII, A7RII, RX1RII, 14 2.8L II, 35 1.4L, 50 1.2L, 85 1.2L II, 135 2L, 16-35 2.8L II, 24-105 4L IS, 24-70 2.8L, 70-200 2.8L IS II, 300 2.8L, 400 5.6L, IS, 800 5.6L IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
navydoc Cream of the Crop More info | Jan 22, 2015 15:05 | #49 It's been so boring today that I polished up my cook top, skillet and kettle.  Polishing up by navydoc45, on FlickrGene - My Photo Gallery ||
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wow, That's shiny Gene. Can you come and do ours? My wife would love you for it. 1DX, 1DIV, 5DIII, A7RII, RX1RII, 14 2.8L II, 35 1.4L, 50 1.2L, 85 1.2L II, 135 2L, 16-35 2.8L II, 24-105 4L IS, 24-70 2.8L, 70-200 2.8L IS II, 300 2.8L, 400 5.6L, IS, 800 5.6L IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
navydoc Cream of the Crop More info | Jan 23, 2015 16:00 | #51 Zethar wrote in post #17396473 Wow, That's shiny Gene. Can you come and do ours? My wife would love you for it.
Gene - My Photo Gallery ||
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DavidArbogast Cream of the Crop More info | Jan 24, 2015 19:48 | #52 Gene, I wanted to test out my new FE lenses (24-70mm and 70-200mm), so I popped over to the Combat Air Museum in Topeka. Got to take in that amazing scale model of the USS Oriskany. It was a great place for lens testing.  U.S. Air Force by David Arbogast, on FlickrDavid | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
navydoc Cream of the Crop More info | Jan 24, 2015 21:22 | #53 Excellent shot David. Did you happen to take any of the Oriskany model too while you were there? Gene - My Photo Gallery ||
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DavidArbogast Cream of the Crop More info Post edited over 8 years ago by David Arbogast. (3 edits in all) | Jan 25, 2015 19:19 | #54 2-Stop/3-Exposure brackets, tonemapped in Photoengine:  The Road No More by David Arbogast, on FlickrDavid | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DavidArbogast Cream of the Crop More info | Jan 26, 2015 13:12 | #56 smythie wrote in post #17400503 Excellent use of the technique Thank you! David | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 29, 2015 11:08 | #57 Anyone else disappointed with the distortion on this lens? I mostly shoot landscapes and getting a straight horizon is very rare. A lot of distortion on either ends of the zoom range. Easy enough fix in post, even though imo a lens at this price range shouldn't be this bad.. Fixing it in post requires cropping... Glad I bought the body with 36mp |Sony A7r|Rok 14 f/2.8|24-105 f/4L|40mm f/2.8|Metabones IV|
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 30, 2015 20:45 | #58 David Arbogast wrote in post #17400137 2-Stop/3-Exposure brackets, tonemapped in Photoengine:  The Road No More by David Arbogast, on Flickrlove this!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 30, 2015 20:49 | #59 cozmo2312 wrote in post #17405693 Anyone else disappointed with the distortion on this lens? I mostly shoot landscapes and getting a straight horizon is very rare. A lot of distortion on either ends of the zoom range. Easy enough fix in post, even though imo a lens at this price range shouldn't be this bad.. Fixing it in post requires cropping... Glad I bought the body with 36mp  I was disappointed at first and I had never had to do correction. I would have think a uwa have something like the distortion so I cant believe it's on a standard zoom. even with canon's 17-40L uwa wasn't aweful at all.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is griggt 828 guests, 168 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
But you haven't heard my rates yet! 
