Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Nature & Landscapes 
Thread started 26 Feb 2015 (Thursday) 12:26
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Alaska - Turnagain Arm

 
rgs
Goldmember
Avatar
2,287 posts
Gallery: 142 photos
Likes: 826
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Oklahoma City
Post edited over 4 years ago by rgs. (2 edits in all)
     
Feb 26, 2015 12:26 |  #1

Here's an image from a few years ago. It was shot with borrowed D60 (not a 60D). This was my first digital outing and convinced me I was wrong about digital. I retired my Pentax 67 soon after.

I'm going back over these files looking for ones that I can do more with now than I could at the time. This shot across the Turnagain Arm on the Kenai Peninsula. Here's the question: should I leave the RR tracks in or clone them out? I'm very interested in your opinions. Thanks.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Canon 7d MkII, Canon 50D, Pentax 67, Canon 30D, Baker Custom 4x5, Canon EF 24-104mm f4, Canon EF 100mm f2.8 Macro, Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5, 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC

The Singular Image (external link)Richard Smith Photography (external link)
Richard Smith Real Estate Photography (external link)500PX (external link)
Fine Art America (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
cerett
Senior Member
804 posts
Likes: 152
Joined Jun 2013
Location: Santa Ana, California
     
Feb 26, 2015 16:46 |  #2

The railroad tracks don't particularly bother me. But, if you do try to clone them out, do it on a duplicate file (or layer) so it is non destructive. I would definitely recommend darkening the clouds (and water) to add more drama.


Marty
5D M3, 14/2.8 II, 24/1.4 II, 16-35/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 70-200/2.8 II, 300/2.8, 200-400/4, 500/4 II, 24/3.5 TS-E, 17/4 TS-E, Zeiss 21/2.8; H5D-50C, HCD 28/4, HC 35/3.5, HC 50/3.5II, HCD 35-90/4.5-5.6, HC 150/3.2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bsmotril
Goldmember
Avatar
2,516 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 232
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Austin TX
     
Feb 27, 2015 10:19 |  #3

I like it. If you do want to eliminate the tracks, an easier way than cloning is to dupe the brush in front of the track as a separate layer, move it up to cover the tracks, and then feather/erase the edges to blend it into the background.


Gear List
Galleries: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/smopho/ (external link) --- http://billsmotrilla.z​enfolio.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Canon_Lover
Goldmember
Avatar
2,695 posts
Likes: 102
Joined Jan 2011
Location: WA
     
Feb 27, 2015 11:10 |  #4

Classic Alaska scenery! Thanks for sharing!

I don't mind the tracks at all. I think it's honest to show them there.


My 500PX (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
john5189
Senior Member
598 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Dec 2008
     
Feb 27, 2015 11:15 |  #5

Did not even notice the track until I read you post!


Wedding Photography in Herefordshire.  (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alveric
Goldmember
Avatar
4,590 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Likes: 1044
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Canada
     
Feb 27, 2015 16:54 |  #6

If it's a documentary shot, the tracks must remain.

If it's fine art, it'd look worse without the tracks: just three bands of different hues and brightness. The tracks add interest and maybe even a smidgen of mystery to the whole.


'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blackchrome
Senior Member
Avatar
625 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 135
Joined Feb 2012
Location: Twinfalls ID
     
Feb 27, 2015 23:23 |  #7

I like it as is.... unless their would of been a early era locomotive on that track. :-) You did great I like this.


Stacy Shane

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

947 views & 0 likes for this thread
Alaska - Turnagain Arm
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Nature & Landscapes 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is milashinyz
620 guests, 359 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.