Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Tripods, Monopods & Other Camera Support 
Thread started 23 Feb 2015 (Monday) 00:18
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Best lightweight tripod/head combo?

 
thepaul
Member
Avatar
55 posts
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Fresno California
     
Feb 23, 2015 00:18 |  #1

I'm looking for your opinion on the best lightweight tripod/head combination that money can by.

To be used for landscape photography (rough terrain, placed in rivers, on rocks, etc.). Strapped to the side of a backpack (Clik Elite Sport) for day hikes.

Obviously being lightweight and compact is extremely important, but stability and utility take precedence.

Thanks for taking the time to read/respond.


http://pscott.photo (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,474 posts
Likes: 153
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
Post edited over 3 years ago by SkipD.
     
Feb 23, 2015 06:18 |  #2

thepaul wrote in post #17445097 (external link)
I'm looking for your opinion on the best lightweight tripod/head combination that money can by.

To be used for landscape photography (rough terrain, placed in rivers, on rocks, etc.). Strapped to the side of a backpack (Clik Elite Sport) for day hikes.

Obviously being lightweight and compact is extremely important, but stability and utility take precedence.

Nobody can give you a useful answer without more information. Obviously, you need something with independently adjustable leg angles, convertible leg tips, and easily cleanable legs but there's a lot more that's needed.

What camera/lens combination(s) do you intend to use on this tripod?
What's the longest shutter speed time you expect to use?
What height range do you feel that you need?
What weight can you tolerate for the tripod/head combination?
What type of head do you anticipate needing? Is precision positioning needed?
What is your budget?


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drumsfield
Goldmember
Avatar
1,596 posts
Likes: 27
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Bethesda Md
     
Feb 23, 2015 09:34 |  #3

I use a Gitzo 1542T with a Markins Q3 and also carry a Clik Elite Probody bag. Plenty stable for anything smaller than a 70-700mm lens though still capable of handling my 100-400 with 2x TC. For a beefier setup I have a Induro CT214 and Acratech GV2 which is comparable to a 2 series Gitzo. If you're looking for the best money can buy I recommend the Gitzo they aren't cheap and their customer service is horrendous but they are a work of art.


My review of the Inuro
https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1330954


Canon 5D MkIII | Olympus OM-D | Olympus E-P2 | 16-35L MKII | 24-70L MKII | 70-200L MKII | 85L MKII | EF 50mm 1.4 | EF 100mm 2.8 | 100-400mm L MKII | 20mm 1.7
Feedback and Full gear list
Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bcaps
I was a little buzzed when I took this
Avatar
782 posts
Gallery: 64 photos
Best ofs: 16
Likes: 1585
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
Feb 23, 2015 12:21 |  #4

drumsfield wrote in post #17445565 (external link)
I use a Gitzo 1542T with a Markins Q3 and also carry a Clik Elite Probody bag. Plenty stable for anything smaller than a 70-700mm lens though still capable of handling my 100-400 with 2x TC. For a beefier setup I have a Induro CT214 and Acratech GV2 which is comparable to a 2 series Gitzo. If you're looking for the best money can buy I recommend the Gitzo they aren't cheap and their customer service is horrendous but they are a work of art.


My review of the Inuro
https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1330954

I have been looking at lighter setups myself recently and the 1542/Q3T was something I have considered. I also considered the Induro CT113 and RRS TQC-14. All have a central column and are on the lighter side of the tripod kingdom:

Gitzo 1542T: 2.2 lb
Induro CT113: 2.7 lb
RRS TQC-14: 2.6 lb


However, like the OP, I also shoot in conditions that will really test the tripods stability. The Induro and RRS seem (based solely on photos) to have thicker leg elements (for the increased weight) than the Gitzo which may translate into greater stability.

My current tripod is the RRS TVC-24 which weighs 3.3 lb. The 1.1 lb savings of the Gitzo is tempting but I do worry that those stick-like lower leg sections would present a problem if setup, say, in a stream with fast flowing water and a 8+ second exposure. I have no issues with my RRS in that situation.

My light-weight backpacking ballhead is the RRS BH-30 which weighs 11 ounces. The Markins Q3T is 2 ounces heavier. I've yet to find a lighter ballhead that is in the same league as the RRS.

For me the "Money-is-no-object-backpacking-tripod-setup" would be (all with the BH-30 head):

1. Shorter hikes or base camping with a few longer hikes of 10-15 miles/day: RRS TVC-24
2. Moderate number of longer hikes of 10+ miles/day: RRS TQC-14 or the Induro CT113
3. Thru hiking or longer hikes off trail on rough terrain: Gitzo 1542T


- Dave | flickr (external link)
Nikon D810
14-24mm f/2.8 | 16-35mm F/4 | 24-70mm f/2.8 | 70-200mm f/4 | Sigma 150-600mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thepaul
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
55 posts
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Fresno California
     
Feb 23, 2015 13:05 |  #5

SkipD wrote in post #17445359 (external link)
Nobody can give you a useful answer without more information. Obviously, you need something with independently adjustable leg angles, convertible leg tips, and easily cleanable legs but there's a lot more that's needed.

Thanks for taking the time to reply.

What camera/lens combination(s) do you intend to use on this tripod?

Gear is listed in my signature

What's the longest shutter speed time you expect to use?

I don't have a top end on longest shutter speed I expect to use. Perhaps the Tripod will dictate that?

What height range do you feel that you need?

I'm 5'10"

What weight can you tolerate for the tripod/head combination?

This is an excellent question. I don't know, but maybe I could run some tests carrying heavy things in my pack. I can see that the term "lightweight" will mean different things to different people.

What type of head do you anticipate needing? Is precision positioning needed?

I don't think precision positioning is needed. That sounds like a something I would want for macro, but this set up is for landscape. If precision means something else in this context, I'd love to learn about it.

What is your budget?

Unlimited.


http://pscott.photo (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thepaul
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
55 posts
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Fresno California
     
Feb 23, 2015 13:06 |  #6

drumsfield wrote in post #17445565 (external link)
I use a Gitzo 1542T with a Markins Q3 and also carry a Clik Elite Probody bag.

Thanks for the reply and the link to your detailed review! This setup is now on my shortlist!


http://pscott.photo (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thepaul
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
55 posts
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Fresno California
     
Feb 23, 2015 13:11 |  #7

Bcaps wrote in post #17445843 (external link)
For me the "Money-is-no-object-backpacking-tripod-setup" would be (all with the BH-30 head):

1. Shorter hikes or base camping with a few longer hikes of 10-15 miles/day: RRS TVC-24
2. Moderate number of longer hikes of 10+ miles/day: RRS TQC-14 or the Induro CT113
3. Thru hiking or longer hikes off trail on rough terrain: Gitzo 1542T

Thanks so much for the reply Dave. I never even considered having different sticks for the different situations you outline. This is a really great idea. I will be researching all of the models you list.


http://pscott.photo (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,474 posts
Likes: 153
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Feb 23, 2015 15:09 |  #8

thepaul wrote in post #17445911 (external link)
I don't think precision positioning is needed. That sounds like a something I would want for macro, but this set up is for landscape. If precision means something else in this context, I'd love to learn about it.

Although a ball head is a very versatile type of head for field use, some ball heads don't really allow for small adjustments in camera positioning well. If you need to make small tweaks to how a camera is aimed, you may want one of the very best ball heads available (which have no experience with to be able to recommend any) or you could use a geared head like I occasionally use. Another feature that may be very useful to you is a separate release to the horizontal positioning of the head as this is super-convenient if doing a multi-image panoramic set of shots.

I'd say that you want a tripod system that will get the viewfinder to at least six inches or a foot higher than your eye. That way, the tripod can be set up downhill from you and still not be too short.

Don't expect to be extending the center column on a regular basis when choosing the height. Doing that will make the camera/lens less steady.

Having more sections in the tripod legs (to allow it to fold up shorter) causes a trade-off in rigidity because this reduces the diameter of leg sections.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
johnf3f
Goldmember
Avatar
3,875 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 568
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Wales
Post edited over 3 years ago by johnf3f.
     
Feb 23, 2015 16:22 |  #9

My personal lightweight setup is a Gitzo 2531 and a Triopo RS3 head.
Personally I don't care how small the tripod folds up so I prefer to have fewer leg sections and I liker the extra rigidity offered by a Gitzo 2 series over the 1 series. The center column can be handy for quick height adjustments but I never extend it more than an inch or two.
You have probably never heard of the Triopo RS3 head but it is a little gem IMO. I have added an Arca type clamp and the the combo weighs abut 330 grams. It has the finest lockup of any ball head that I have tried and is fully capable of securely holding any EF lens at any angle even when set up out of balance.
Total weight is about 1850 grams including rubber + spiked feet. I don't know if this is the sort of thing you are after but this setup works for me with lenses up to 300mm or so.


Life is for living, cameras are to capture it (one day I will learn how!).

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
corndog ­ cabernet
Senior Member
Avatar
364 posts
Gallery: 72 photos
Likes: 729
Joined May 2010
Location: State of chaos
Post edited over 3 years ago by corndog cabernet. (4 edits in all)
     
Mar 01, 2015 15:19 |  #10

I recommend that you not focus too closely on the last few ounces. Your equipment is quite heavy to start with.

I think very highly of both Markins (Q3 is plenty) and Gitzo. Concentrate on which models suit your requirements over what might save you a few ounces.

The Chinese knock offs of Benro and Induro (collet types, not flip levers) are pretty damn good if you want to save a couple of bucks, but stay with Markins.

Just my $.02

And BTW, there is no free ride. For a given type of construction, a lighter tripod will always flex more than a heavier one. 4 leg sections will flex more than 3.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
peter_n
Goldmember
Avatar
2,389 posts
Likes: 52
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Boston, MA
     
Mar 03, 2015 09:04 |  #11

thepaul wrote in post #17445097 (external link)
I'm looking for your opinion on the best lightweight tripod/head combination that money can by.

If you work on the principle of you get what you pay for, then your tripod choices are Gitzo or RRS. Those two brands are at the top of the quality heap, so the light weight choices there would be something like the Gitzo GT2542 and the RRS TQC-14.

There's more of a choice in the ballhead department; I've used Acratech, Arca-Swiss, Markins and RRS models and all are quality heads. You need a ballhead with a max. outside diameter of 53mm for the base to work on the RRS TQC-14. If you bring utiity into the equation the Acratech heads have a leveling base built in and they're great in extreme environments because of their open design. Their GPSS model has a base diameter of 53mm but they also make that model with larger diameters.


~Peter

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nebulight
Member
Avatar
247 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Lancaster, PA
Post edited over 3 years ago by nebulight.
     
Mar 03, 2015 09:27 |  #12

peter_n wrote in post #17458376 (external link)
If you work on the principle of you get what you pay for, then your tripod choices are Gitzo or RRS. Those two brands are at the top of the quality heap, so the light weight choices there would be something like the Gitzo GT2542 and the RRS TQC-14.

There's more of a choice in the ballhead department; I've used Acratech, Arca-Swiss, Markins and RRS models and all are quality heads. You need a ballhead with a max. outside diameter of 53mm for the base to work on the RRS TQC-14. If you bring utiity into the equation the Acratech heads have a leveling base built in and they're great in extreme environments because of their open design. Their GPSS model has a base diameter of 53mm but they also make that model with larger diameters.

doesn't the GP-S also have a 53mm diameter?


.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
peter_n
Goldmember
Avatar
2,389 posts
Likes: 52
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Boston, MA
     
Mar 03, 2015 13:45 |  #13

Yes it does, it's a bit bigger up above the base but the RRS TQC-14 has an awkward looking locking ring on the center column that could foul on any number of ballheads. So I gave the OP the smallest/lightest model number and he can go up from there.


~Peter

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
phantelope
Goldmember
Avatar
1,889 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 39
Joined Sep 2008
Location: NorCal
     
Mar 03, 2015 13:49 |  #14

I'm very happy with my MeFoto roadtrip, I got the aluminum, carbon is not that much lighter. Converts to a monopod too. And to me the ballhead seems quite good, though I usually have other heads on my regular tripod, pistolgrip or one with those two arms you use to move and lock it down, can't remember what those are called.

The MeFoto is quite small when put together, comes with a nice bag, spikes to replace the rubber feet if needed. Very well made for my purpose


40D, 5D3, a bunch of lenses and other things :cool:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Echo63
Goldmember
Avatar
2,866 posts
Likes: 166
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Perth - Western Australia - Earth
     
Mar 03, 2015 23:06 |  #15

phantelope wrote in post #17458827 (external link)
I'm very happy with my MeFoto roadtrip, I got the aluminum, carbon is not that much lighter. Converts to a monopod too. And to me the ballhead seems quite good, though I usually have other heads on my regular tripod, pistolgrip or one with those two arms you use to move and lock it down, can't remember what those are called.

The MeFoto is quite small when put together, comes with a nice bag, spikes to replace the rubber feet if needed. Very well made for my purpose

carbon is stiffer than aluminium though, so although the weight is similar, it will support your gear better.


for what its worth, I have two tripods, on really light one, for my compact system (Sirui T-025X, for my Leica M system) and a big heavy Slik for when i work with my Canons.

some days, with no extension in the legs, the Sirui will hold a 70-200 nicely.
then sometimes, the Slik isn't big and stiff enough to properly support a 1D and 70-200 (typically in crappy weather though, windy etc)

no tripod fits all categories, my next tripod will be a big RRS, similar weight to my current SLIK, but a bit taller and a lot stiffer, suitable for big lenses, like the 400 f2.8 and 600 f4 (which i do use occasionally, typically mounted straight onto the centre column without a head - as the ballhead introduces to much flex and vibration.


My Best Imageswww.echo63.deviantart.​com (external link)
Gear listhttps://photography-on-the.net …p?p=2463426&pos​tcount=385

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

3,458 views & 0 likes for this thread
Best lightweight tripod/head combo?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Tripods, Monopods & Other Camera Support 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is alexjmck
549 guests, 307 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.