Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 21 Feb 2015 (Saturday) 23:15
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Should I shoot in RAW or RAW+JPEG?

 
kirkt
Cream of the Crop
5,540 posts
Likes: 474
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA USA
     
Feb 26, 2015 15:46 as a reply to  @ post 17451204 |  #16

if that's what you want to do, yes.

kirk


Kirk
---
images: http://kirkt.smugmug.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
WebDevGuy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,472 posts
Gallery: 30 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 412
Joined Nov 2009
     
Feb 26, 2015 22:08 |  #17

Thanks everyone for your insight and suggestions! I have alot to mull over.


7D Mark ii, T1i/500D, 17-55 2.8, 100-400L mk II - More Gear
Feedback: 1, 2, 3, 4, (and 230+ 100% ebay)
flickr (external link)
Join the group: Canon 7D Mark II + Canon 100-400mm L IS II on flickr (external link)
5 out of 4 people can't do fractions.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Steinn
Member
Avatar
115 posts
Gallery: 99 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 272
Joined Feb 2015
Location: Tromsø, Norway
     
Feb 27, 2015 01:35 as a reply to  @ post 17451204 |  #18

From the RAW in LR you can make different presets in Export for different purposes, make a adjustment in Export panel >Add and rename for future use
I use like :
3000 pix
1500 pix
Facebook
SmugMug
etc.
You can even choose which folder the jpg ends up in directly form the preset.
Stein


Stein Ø. Nilsen tromsofoto.net
Tromsø - Norway
Photo - Birdsound - Guide

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
WebDevGuy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,472 posts
Gallery: 30 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 412
Joined Nov 2009
     
Feb 27, 2015 01:51 |  #19

crbinson wrote in post #17443527 (external link)
I guess a matter of preference. If I'm shooting RAW; I'm shooting +JPEG.
I import all to LR then I dump both files if the image is junk, dump the RAW/keep the JPEG if it is snapshot quality (kids at play, family events, etc), and keep both files only if it is wall hanger or something I feel would warrant my time for editing to any significant extent.

Thanks!

So if you shoot in RAW+JPEG then LR can import both and handle them as 1 file? So if I trash a bad pic it trashes both the RAW + JPEG?

Also, is there a way in LR5 to somehow delete the RAW and just keep the JPEG for the ones that don't need extensive post processing? How about deleting the JPEG and keeping the RAW in LR5?

Thanks again!


7D Mark ii, T1i/500D, 17-55 2.8, 100-400L mk II - More Gear
Feedback: 1, 2, 3, 4, (and 230+ 100% ebay)
flickr (external link)
Join the group: Canon 7D Mark II + Canon 100-400mm L IS II on flickr (external link)
5 out of 4 people can't do fractions.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LincsRP
Senior Member
427 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 40
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Lincolnshire,UK
     
Mar 02, 2015 15:08 as a reply to  @ WebDevGuy's post |  #20

Personally I shoot in jpeg. When I shoot raw plus jpeg I find the raws are most often under-exposed a bit. Maybe 1/3rd stop or more likely 2/3rds stop.

So, as raw shooters shoot raw to extract the ultimate quality from their files it makes sense to shoot either ETTR or any other magical format raw shooters prefer. Note; I am not suggesting raw or jpeg is better here - jpeg just is, right :)

Seriously, raw files take an awful lot more exposure before they're nuked and that's a bonus. Shooting raw plus jpeg then would render the jpegs useless if shot this way. I do think to settle on one or another format is best and work the format to their best ability.

Bearing in mind my raw experience is limited to a Rawtherapee and Canon DPP.


Steve
www.lincsracephotos.co​.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Steinn
Member
Avatar
115 posts
Gallery: 99 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 272
Joined Feb 2015
Location: Tromsø, Norway
     
Mar 11, 2015 05:45 |  #21

I have all my RAW on the harddrive, and when I need a jpg I create it there and then in LR5 or in PS for web/print.
I NEVER delete a good RAW-file! Guess if you make a 20x30 cm printout of your Rembrandt, you would'nt burn the original? :)
If the RAW is too dark you should have overexposed a bit, use the histogram to check your exposure.
My first RAW-files from 10D, 20D etc. is far better with latest editions of software than 10 years ago, who knows what it looks like in future??
SO my advice, DO NOT chuck away your RAW-files!!
Stein


Stein Ø. Nilsen tromsofoto.net
Tromsø - Norway
Photo - Birdsound - Guide

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tabi_24
Member
147 posts
Gallery: 30 photos
Likes: 133
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Leesburg, FL
     
Mar 11, 2015 05:51 |  #22

I used to shoot in raw+jpeg but for me there was no practical use for it. It's much easier to just save your edited raw as a jpeg and takes a lot less space.


http://www.foreverafte​rphotography.net
http://www.tabithaspho​tography.webs.com
Cameras: Canon 5D Mark ii, Canon 7D, Canon EOS Rebel T2i
Lenses: Canon 10-22mm, 50mm f1.4, 70-200mm f 2.8L IS, 24-105 L f4, Venus Optics Laowa 15mm f4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Steinn
Member
Avatar
115 posts
Gallery: 99 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 272
Joined Feb 2015
Location: Tromsø, Norway
     
Mar 11, 2015 08:23 as a reply to  @ tabi_24's post |  #23

So that means you create a jpeg and delete the RAW? And when someone calls you and wants a tiff or 16:9 crop or your photo as wallpaper you then use your compressed jpg for this task?
I would not dare to delete the RAW, buy a portabel harddrive and store them just in case.


Stein Ø. Nilsen tromsofoto.net
Tromsø - Norway
Photo - Birdsound - Guide

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LincsRP
Senior Member
427 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 40
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Lincolnshire,UK
     
Mar 11, 2015 19:15 |  #24

Steinn wrote in post #17470063 (external link)
So that means you create a jpeg and delete the RAW? And when someone calls you and wants a tiff or 16:9 crop or your photo as wallpaper you then use your compressed jpg for this task?
I would not dare to delete the RAW, buy a portabel harddrive and store them just in case.

Oh, I don't know why folks pronounce raw as RAW as it's not an acronym as JPEG is but, hey ho, everyone to their own :)

So, why can't we produce a .tiff file or a poster or whatever from jpeg files? We have to remember either a) the poster is not shooting professional, they don't have the funds to buy a hard drive or they maybe shoot 100,000 images a year which I do and they ain't gonna be worth storing as raw files.

Ultimate image quality follows after image content, availability and price. Shoot all raw files equals more storage space equals more cost equals more price to the consumer and they don't bite the higher price. Images from smartphones are being used in the media now and they are paying zilch, nada, nothing.

JPEGS, MPEGS and such are paying the bills. Shoot, produce, supply and collect. Nobody bar the filmakers is making a dime outta the raw files. Raws are for the creators, the artistic and talented and so on.

Apologies if I offend anyone but, if anyone is shooting raw for commercial use now they're heading for bankrupsy. That is unless they have a prepaid venture.


Steve
www.lincsracephotos.co​.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
WebDevGuy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,472 posts
Gallery: 30 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 412
Joined Nov 2009
     
Mar 11, 2015 20:11 as a reply to  @ LincsRP's post |  #25

Thanks everyone for their viewpoints and insight! I realize that both (JPEG and RAW) are used successfully by pro photographers and hobbiests alike. I enjoy the various paradigms. Thanks!


7D Mark ii, T1i/500D, 17-55 2.8, 100-400L mk II - More Gear
Feedback: 1, 2, 3, 4, (and 230+ 100% ebay)
flickr (external link)
Join the group: Canon 7D Mark II + Canon 100-400mm L IS II on flickr (external link)
5 out of 4 people can't do fractions.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hollis_f
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,649 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 84
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Sussex, UK
     
Mar 12, 2015 02:24 |  #26

LincsRP wrote in post #17470884 (external link)
Shoot all raw files equals more storage space equals more cost equals more price to the consumer

Hmmmm, a 2TB drive costs around £60 and will hold about 60,000 raw files. That adds a massive one-tenth of a penny per image.


Frank Hollis - Retired mass spectroscopist
Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he'll complain about the withdrawal of his free fish entitlement.
Gear Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pagman
I just hold the thing :-)
Avatar
8,010 posts
Gallery: 1556 photos
Likes: 5525
Joined Dec 2011
     
Mar 13, 2015 22:22 |  #27

I save all my Good Raws in a folder then onto a disk, the problem with doing this is i can not tell instantly what each RAW is or its quality, it used to be different with Negs you could hold them up to light and see them, why keep all the Raws you might ask? well if someone sees a Jpeg and then wants the Raw i have it saved.

P.


Some stuff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EnglishBob
Senior Member
Avatar
555 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 114
Joined Dec 2004
Location: Clovis, California.
     
Mar 13, 2015 22:27 |  #28

I've been shooting just RAW for the last 3-4 years, prior to that I was shooting both.

I use ACDSee that allows me to view the raw files quickly, and if I need a quick batch of jpg's can convert an entire folder in a few seconds.


Gallery (external link) MyGear (external link) About Me (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
WebDevGuy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,472 posts
Gallery: 30 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 412
Joined Nov 2009
     
Mar 13, 2015 22:37 as a reply to  @ EnglishBob's post |  #29

Great tips everyone!


7D Mark ii, T1i/500D, 17-55 2.8, 100-400L mk II - More Gear
Feedback: 1, 2, 3, 4, (and 230+ 100% ebay)
flickr (external link)
Join the group: Canon 7D Mark II + Canon 100-400mm L IS II on flickr (external link)
5 out of 4 people can't do fractions.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Steinn
Member
Avatar
115 posts
Gallery: 99 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 272
Joined Feb 2015
Location: Tromsø, Norway
     
Mar 14, 2015 09:39 as a reply to  @ Pagman's post |  #30

My experience is few newspapers or magazines wants raw, but they have different needs as jpg, png or tiff.
If you use Lightroom or DPP (Canon) you can easily add stars or colours to the usefull ones and easly delete the rubbish.
In Lightroom you just push X and it is greyed out of the "Lightbox" just as we did with dias in the old days :)
Shift -backslash and they dissapear for ever!
And for harddrives, YES it is part of the hobby/business - you need to have copies in case the tragedy strikes. Myself nearly lost 2 years of birdsound recording this winter due to useing only a singel HD.. Stupid as it is!


Stein Ø. Nilsen tromsofoto.net
Tromsø - Norway
Photo - Birdsound - Guide

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

5,939 views & 1 like for this thread
Should I shoot in RAW or RAW+JPEG?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is macui
468 guests, 375 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.