LonelyBoy wrote in post #17486843
Can you see how the constant refrain of "unacceptable DR!" gets really, really dull to everyone else? It bothers you, we get it. It's also highly unlikely to change in the foreseeable future, and all the bellyaching isn't going to change it a whit. How about we discuss anything else about these cameras, new things, instead of just saying "unacceptable DR!" over and over?
Given the highly specialized nature of this camera (high megapixel, capped at ISO6400), discussion and comments about DR are warranted, IMO. This is a studio and landscapers camera...the latter group puts a lot of value in DR. I'm not a landscaper, but I can empathize.
Releasing a 50mp sensor that, compared to the competition, underperforms in a key area like DR, is the equivalent of a car manufacturer developing a great motor for a sports car, and mating it to a crappy transmission and drive-train.
It would also be the equivalent of Canon releasing a sports oriented camera, that had less FPS, and a worse AF system than it's competitors.