Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive 
Thread started 19 Apr 2007 (Thursday) 21:47
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Canon EF 50mm f/1.2L USM (2)

 
prarts
Member
52 posts
Likes: 19
Joined Mar 2013
     
May 13, 2015 03:51 |  #1051


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


6D; EF 50mm 1:1.2 L USM; EF 24-105mm f1:4 L IS USM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
FTb
Senior Member
525 posts
Gallery: 93 photos
Likes: 2939
Joined Jun 2014
Post edited over 1 year ago by FTb. (2 edits in all)
     
May 13, 2015 05:39 |  #1052

Wide open at f1.2. I really wouldn't want it any sharper, particularly for portraits.

IMAGE: https://c1.staticflickr.com/8/7639/16896371802_9c4b1ce143_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/rK5j​Fd  (external link) _MG_5316 (external link) by brusbybrusby (external link), on Flickr


My flickr (external link)
Favorite lenses: Canon 16-35 f/4 L IS, 50/1.2L, 85/1.2L II, 135/2L, 70-200L IS II, TS-E 17mm f/4L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
prarts
Member
52 posts
Likes: 19
Joined Mar 2013
     
May 14, 2015 05:44 |  #1053


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


6D; EF 50mm 1:1.2 L USM; EF 24-105mm f1:4 L IS USM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scobols
Goldmember
Avatar
1,256 posts
Gallery: 78 photos
Likes: 324
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Waconia, MN
     
May 14, 2015 07:01 |  #1054

A few from a senior session last summer.

1.

IMAGE: http://www.scottbolster.com/potn/ml-01.jpg

2.

IMAGE: http://www.scottbolster.com/potn/ml-02.jpg

3.

IMAGE: http://www.scottbolster.com/potn/ml-03.jpg

www.scottbolster.com (external link)
facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wallstreetoneil
Goldmember
Avatar
2,085 posts
Gallery: 14 photos
Likes: 1196
Joined Nov 2014
Location: Toronto Canada
     
May 14, 2015 08:14 |  #1055

In my opinion, the last 3 posts highlight perfectly the 50L
- F1.2 just isn't tack sharp anywhere - you can't get the eye tack sharp (that is fine for a 'look' but most of the time?)
- F 1.8 you absolutely can get a tack sharp area
- F2 for portraits is a nice sweet spot if you want good sharpness and good bokeh
- F2.8 gets you far, far better sharpness in the corners than F2 and is a very useful aperture

My personal experience is that F1.4 is the aperture where you can go to for crazy bokeh and still get that tiny bit of crispness for certain artistic portraits with the 50L whereas you can go to F1.2 on the 85L.


Hockey and wedding photographer. Favourite camera / lens combos: a 1DX II with a Tamron 45 1.8 VC, an A7Rii with a Canon 24-70F2.8L II, and a 5DSR with a Tamron 85 1.8 VC. Every lens I own I strongly recommend [Canon (35Lii, 100L Macro, 24-70F2.8ii, 70-200F2.8ii, 100-400Lii), Tamron (45 1.8, 85 1.8), Sigma 24-105]. If there are better lenses out there let me know because I haven't found them.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
x.pozhr
Goldmember
Avatar
4,729 posts
Gallery: 302 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 673
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Chandler, Arizona
Post edited over 3 years ago by x.pozhr.
     
May 14, 2015 09:37 |  #1056

^ Couldn’t agree with you more. Well said.

Debating if I should return my 50L. But then, what’re the other options? Any thoughts?


flickr (external link)
Gear List + Marketplace Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tommydigi
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,536 posts
Gallery: 36 photos
Likes: 374
Joined May 2010
Location: Chicago
     
May 14, 2015 09:43 |  #1057

I've had this lens for a while I find at 1.2 works in some situations. I find 1.6 is very good and 2.0 and on is sharp.

This is an entire album of shots with the 50 1.2. Some at 1.2 and many in the 1.6 to 2.8 area.
https://www.flickr.com …04/sets/7215763​1970525159 (external link)


Website (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Instagram (external link)
Canon 5DII • 7DII • G15 • 24LII • 50L • 100L • 135L • 40 STM • 16-35L F4 IS • 24-70L F4 IS • 100-400L II • 1.4x • 600EX II • 270 EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wallstreetoneil
Goldmember
Avatar
2,085 posts
Gallery: 14 photos
Likes: 1196
Joined Nov 2014
Location: Toronto Canada
     
May 14, 2015 09:53 |  #1058

p360 wrote in post #17556051 (external link)
^ Couldn’t agree with you more. Well said.

Debating if I should return my 50L. But then, what’re the other options? Any thoughts?


I'm a huge 50L fan so it would be my #1 choice. The Sigma is more contrasty / more clinical at F1.4 but the 50L has that quality that is 'je ne sais quoi' that has made it stand the test of time. I'm not a L lens snob but I also am in certain situations. The day is coming when mirrorless will take over and all these magic L lens will be replaced by the next L lens - until that day, the 35L, 50L, 85L, 135L are the standard pro primes within the Canon world - but Sigma sure does make far, far better lens than they use to - and I love their 18-35 1.8 on my 7D2 and C100 - that is a great lens.


Hockey and wedding photographer. Favourite camera / lens combos: a 1DX II with a Tamron 45 1.8 VC, an A7Rii with a Canon 24-70F2.8L II, and a 5DSR with a Tamron 85 1.8 VC. Every lens I own I strongly recommend [Canon (35Lii, 100L Macro, 24-70F2.8ii, 70-200F2.8ii, 100-400Lii), Tamron (45 1.8, 85 1.8), Sigma 24-105]. If there are better lenses out there let me know because I haven't found them.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nathan
So boring
Avatar
7,702 posts
Gallery: 16 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 288
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Boston
Post edited over 3 years ago by Nathan. (2 edits in all)
     
May 14, 2015 10:39 |  #1059

"Most of the time" I'm not looking for tack sharpness. I'm not looking for crazy bokeh, either. I'm just looking for a decent image that is composed well and evokes a nice feeling. My common f-stops for the 50L are 1.2, 1.4, 1.6, 2.0, 3.5, and 7.1. Even though there is some softness at 1.2, I'm don't think it matters all that much. No one has ever told me a photo at 1.2 looks bad due to it being a little soft... because the photo itself sucks is another matter, though.  :p

wallstreetoneil wrote in post #17555961 (external link)
In my opinion, the last 3 posts highlight perfectly the 50L
- F1.2 just isn't tack sharp anywhere - you can't get the eye tack sharp (that is fine for a 'look' but most of the time?)
- F 1.8 you absolutely can get a tack sharp area
- F2 for portraits is a nice sweet spot if you want good sharpness and good bokeh
- F2.8 gets you far, far better sharpness in the corners than F2 and is a very useful aperture

My personal experience is that F1.4 is the aperture where you can go to for crazy bokeh and still get that tiny bit of crispness for certain artistic portraits with the 50L whereas you can go to F1.2 on the 85L.


Taking photos with a fancy camera does not make me a photographer.
www.nathantpham.com (external link) | Boston POTN Flickr (external link) |
5D3 x2 | 16-35L II | 35 L | 50L | 85L II | 135L | 580 EX II x2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
x.pozhr
Goldmember
Avatar
4,729 posts
Gallery: 302 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 673
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Chandler, Arizona
     
May 14, 2015 11:03 |  #1060

Sigma is an interesting one, but the sample variations with the inconsistent focus issue worry me. I hear that Sigma has come a long way, but still.

I tested 50L on our dog the other day. I took ten photos, all at f/1.2, and I got decent results with these three.

IMAGE: http://pratyush360photo.com/img/s7/v168/p1179059257-5.jpg

IMAGE: http://pratyush360photo.com/img/s7/v154/p1179059275-5.jpg

IMAGE: http://pratyush360photo.com/img/s12/v170/p1179059291-5.jpg

flickr (external link)
Gear List + Marketplace Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cali92rs
Member
179 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Oct 2014
Location: Long Beach, CA
     
May 14, 2015 13:37 |  #1061

p360 wrote in post #17556051 (external link)
^ Couldn’t agree with you more. Well said.

Debating if I should return my 50L. But then, what’re the other options? Any thoughts?

I wouldn't sell it. The size and weather sealing are big advantages (FOR ME...for you they may not mean much, in that case, I would go for the Sigma).


6D, 16-35mm f4L IS, 24-105mm f4L, 50mm f1.8 STM, 135mm f2L, Tamron 70-300mm VC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nathan
So boring
Avatar
7,702 posts
Gallery: 16 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 288
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Boston
     
May 14, 2015 13:40 as a reply to  @ cali92rs's post |  #1062

Ditto. 50L is a wonderful lens to me, too. If anyone wants great sharpness, then the Sigma Art seems to be the lens of choice. I don't think I hear much about focus variation, either; if there is, then the Sigma dock can help with that.


Taking photos with a fancy camera does not make me a photographer.
www.nathantpham.com (external link) | Boston POTN Flickr (external link) |
5D3 x2 | 16-35L II | 35 L | 50L | 85L II | 135L | 580 EX II x2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cali92rs
Member
179 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Oct 2014
Location: Long Beach, CA
     
May 14, 2015 13:40 |  #1063

p360 wrote in post #17556167 (external link)
Sigma is an interesting one, but the sample variations with the inconsistent focus issue worry me. I hear that Sigma has come a long way, but still.

I tested 50L on our dog the other day. I took ten photos, all at f/1.2, and I got decent results with these three.


QUOTED IMAGE


QUOTED IMAGE


QUOTED IMAGE


I would bump up the ISO a few more stops and use faster shutter speeds. Remember, this lens has no IS, so you want to keep your shutter speeds as fast as possible... and I wouldn't hesitate to go to ISO 800 or 1600 with your 5DIII.


6D, 16-35mm f4L IS, 24-105mm f4L, 50mm f1.8 STM, 135mm f2L, Tamron 70-300mm VC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
x.pozhr
Goldmember
Avatar
4,729 posts
Gallery: 302 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 673
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Chandler, Arizona
Post edited over 3 years ago by x.pozhr.
     
May 14, 2015 14:21 |  #1064

cali92rs wrote in post #17556359 (external link)
I would bump up the ISO a few more stops and use faster shutter speeds. Remember, this lens has no IS, so you want to keep your shutter speeds as fast as possible... and I wouldn't hesitate to go to ISO 800 or 1600 with your 5DIII.


Duly noted. And agreed with the higher ISO on 5DIII.

I like the way 50L renders image. It’s a combination of resolution, contrast, colors, etc. It’s not just one thing. I think I’ll keep the L. :-)

Thanks, guys!


flickr (external link)
Gear List + Marketplace Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
InfiniteDivide
"I wish to be spared"
Avatar
2,844 posts
Gallery: 265 photos
Likes: 212
Joined Dec 2013
Location: Kawasaki, Japan
     
May 14, 2015 18:41 as a reply to  @ x.pozhr's post |  #1065

All you have to do is shoot in AV, go into ISO setting and set the minimum shutter speed to 1/60
Auto ISO and the camera does all the rest.


James Patrus
6D | 16-35L F4 | 24L II | 50L | 100L | |  -> Website (external link) & Gallery (external link)
For Sale:Canon 16-35mm f4 IS l Do you enjoy Super Famicom games? (external link) PM me directly.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

593,326 views & 1,841 likes for this thread
Canon EF 50mm f/1.2L USM (2)
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Aashirs nani
834 guests, 366 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.