I had a good opportunity to photograph that rare bird, the Canada Goose. Still water, good reflection quality. I can't quite nail the composition though, so I offer the full image for your cropping assistance.
iowajim Senior Member ![]() More info | Jun 05, 2015 18:03 | #1 I had a good opportunity to photograph that rare bird, the Canada Goose. Still water, good reflection quality. I can't quite nail the composition though, so I offer the full image for your cropping assistance. Jim, in Iowa
LOG IN TO REPLY |
5Dmaniac Goldmember ![]() 1,303 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2008 Location: Scottsdale, AZ More info | Jun 05, 2015 18:35 | #2 Crop right above the geese's head.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
OhLook insufferably pedantic. I can live with that. ![]() 20,826 posts Gallery: 77 photos Best ofs: 2 Likes: 8977 Joined Dec 2012 Location: California: SF Bay Area More info | Jun 05, 2015 22:33 | #3 I'd take a lot off the sides and a little (the dark stuff behind the grass) off the top, resulting in a portrait format. PRONOUN ADVISORY: OhLook is a she. | A FEW CORRECT SPELLINGS: lens, aperture, amateur, hobbyist, per se, raccoon, whoa, more so (2 wds.), shoo-in | Comments welcome
LOG IN TO REPLY |
itsallart Cream of the Crop ![]() More info | Jun 05, 2015 22:40 | #4 On top what was being said above I would try to place the geese off center if you can...kind of along the rule of thirds Renata
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 05, 2015 23:11 | #5 I'd make the area above and below the heads equal, then chop some off of the left side to give the geese some lead room to the right (their direction of motion). If that doesn't work, I'd try placing the geese in the lower left hand corner, keeping the rule of thirds in mind as much as possible. That's just me though! Too new at this to call myself a photographer!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 06, 2015 07:26 | #6 My thoughts match those of the group, yet it still doesn't do it for me. Any other ideas? Or is this as good as it gets? Jim, in Iowa
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 06, 2015 07:36 | #7 BTW, it's a little overexposed - I bump up the exposure a 1/3 stop for printing and I didn't take that off before posting these pics. Jim, in Iowa
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Left Handed Brisket Combating camera shame since 1977... ![]() More info Post edited over 5 years ago by Left Handed Brisket. | Jun 06, 2015 08:09 | #8 I'd go with portrait orientation. Or maybe square. PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20
LOG IN TO REPLY |
OhLook insufferably pedantic. I can live with that. ![]() 20,826 posts Gallery: 77 photos Best ofs: 2 Likes: 8977 Joined Dec 2012 Location: California: SF Bay Area More info | Jun 06, 2015 13:26 | #9 I'd choose symmetry for this one. The reflections create symmetry one way; go with it. Never mind the rule of thirds. Make the space above the geese's heads equal to the space below the reflected heads. No crop at the bottom. PRONOUN ADVISORY: OhLook is a she. | A FEW CORRECT SPELLINGS: lens, aperture, amateur, hobbyist, per se, raccoon, whoa, more so (2 wds.), shoo-in | Comments welcome
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
Latest registered member is kenf 675 guests, 282 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |