Started my EOS adventure with the 30d back when it came out. Last April I purchased the 5d Mark III, thoroughly enjoy the camera. One thing I do notice about the 5d over the 30d is the "lack" of reach, typical for a FF vs APS-C . Since I made this change and wanting a quality lens with reach, I had planned on saving up and getting the new version of the 100=400 II. Have been following some of the threads here about the 7d Mark II and now hesitant about getting the 100-400II first.
For those who might have been down this road, would you get the lens before the camera and hope the 30d would suffice for a year or so...or get the 7d mark II and come back in a year and get the lens. I currently have the Canon 70-200 2.8 with a extender. Kinda leaning towards the lens but really want the focus ability and shutter rate that the 7d markII has.
Wanting the reach and shutter speed for wildlife and sports...
Knowing what the 5d mark III offers will I be disappointed trying to use the 30d with 100-400II