apersson850 wrote in post #17753164
Basic physics state that a=F/m, i.e. that acceleration is equivalent to force divided by mass. Thus a twice as heavy camera will shake half as much when exposed to the same vibration-inducing force.
Camera shake (and any vibration effect) is more complicated than F/m. Frequency, damping, rotational momentum, and the photographer's stance (at least) need to be taken into account. That would be a lot of figuring. Instead of doing math, why not look at the results of experience?
- Our hands can shake when holding up more weight, especially for a long time.
- If more weight was really effective for steadying a camera, people would be attaching bricks to them.
- P&S cameras and phones have tiny mass, but give pretty sharp pics.
So more mass might help in some situations, but the benefit is hard to pin down, and overall, the advantages of lighter gear might outweigh that of heavier gear.