Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 19 Sep 2015 (Saturday) 14:12
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Will this photo look okay at 45x30?

 
JM ­ Photos
"Childhood ruined"
Avatar
3,374 posts
Gallery: 65 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 322
Joined Sep 2010
Location: Washington: Spokane
     
Sep 19, 2015 14:12 |  #1

Taken on 6D full frame camera
Full image resolution is 5416 x 3611 @ 240ppi.
Customer wants 45x30 print but I've never printed that large before.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/09/3/LQ_748779.jpg
Image hosted by forum (748779)
© JM Photos
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
  



Canon 6D, & Sony α6000
Own: 24-105mm f/4L | Tamron 150-600mm f/5-6.3 | Rokinon 14mm f/1.8
Want: 24-70mm f/2.8 L II | 70-200mm f/2.8 L II
Website: Jordyn Murdock Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
agedbriar
Goldmember
Avatar
2,657 posts
Likes: 398
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Slovenia
     
Sep 19, 2015 15:16 |  #2

I think you should scrutinize it at 100% to find the answer.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
Avatar
13,497 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
Post edited over 8 years ago by tzalman.
     
Sep 19, 2015 16:47 |  #3

Couple questions:

1. How do you figure that as 240 ppi? Seems to me that 3611/30 is around 120 ppi.

2. How do you expect anybody to be able to tell you anything about how the original will take a 2.5X blow-up from viewing a 853x1280 low res version? Can you please post a 100% crop or two?

3. Are you planning to do the upsizing yourself or to leave it to the print lab. If the former, could you please do the resizing and then post a crop from that?


Elie / אלי

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,908 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10101
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Sep 19, 2015 17:36 |  #4

It should print up nicely at nearly 3' x 4' IMHO, depending on how close people want to get to the huge print, which of course will only be reasonably viewed (ie: the whole image) from a reasonable distance anyway. :)


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
Avatar
13,497 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
     
Sep 19, 2015 17:48 as a reply to  @ CyberDyneSystems's post |  #5

Ah, if only all the world were reasonable.


Elie / אלי

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,416 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4503
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
Post edited over 8 years ago by Wilt. (2 edits in all)
     
Sep 19, 2015 18:09 |  #6

CyberDyneSystems wrote in post #17713665 (external link)
It should print up nicely at nearly 3' x 4' IMHO, depending on how close people want to get to the huge print, which of course will only be reasonably viewed (ie: the whole image) from a reasonable distance anyway. :)

^^^

The 45 x 30" print will look as good from 45" away as the 8 x 12" print looks from 12" away.

If your client is as quality-challenged in viewing 5416 x 3611 pixel 45 x 30" print as a miserly customer taking a 960 x 1450 pixel photo from a deliberately-pixel-challenged preview DVD and printing it to 8 x 12", your client will like it just fine because it will be same (just as poor in) quality.

If your intention is to provide 240 'pixel per inch' or ppi, (which is not the same as 240 'dots per inch' or dpi!) you need to up-res via pixel interpolation 240% and provide a file which is about 13000 x 8700 pixels across.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BigAl007
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,118 posts
Gallery: 556 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1681
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Repps cum Bastwick, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK.
     
Sep 19, 2015 19:39 |  #7

I think it will probably look fine. If you are using an average sized monitor then it will probably be running at around 96 to 110 PPI, so just a little less resolution than you have available. So viewing it on screen at 100% should give you a good idea of what it will look like. Well at least those parts of it that will fit on the screen. Personally I have usually been quite happy with printed images that have had to be up rezzed 2 to 3 three times to hit 300 PPI, even when viewing from 12". Of course as with everything YMMV.

Alan


alanevans.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Edsport
Senior Member
662 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Newfoundland Canada
     
Sep 20, 2015 07:01 |  #8

Make sure you leave enough space on top and bottom so you cut off the flag. You could do this by using content aware or clone...


Cameras - Canon 350D, 5D
Lenses - Canon 18-55mm, 75-300mm, 50mm f/1.8, 24-105L, 24-70L
Flashes - Yongnuo YN460 II, YN468
RF-602 transmitter and 2 receivers

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GeoKras1989
Goldmember
Avatar
4,038 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 262
Joined Jun 2014
     
Sep 20, 2015 10:28 |  #9
bannedPermanent ban

A bud of mine prints ISO 6400 shots from a 7D at 30"x20" all the time. They look fine. This should be a piece of cake for a 6D at ISO 100. Just don't view if from a foot away.


WARNING: I often dispense advice in fields I know little about!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JM ­ Photos
THREAD ­ STARTER
"Childhood ruined"
Avatar
3,374 posts
Gallery: 65 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 322
Joined Sep 2010
Location: Washington: Spokane
     
Sep 20, 2015 14:05 |  #10

Edsport wrote in post #17714250 (external link)
Make sure you leave enough space on top and bottom so you cut off the flag. You could do this by using content aware or clone...

Why would I cut off the flag? Because its blurry? Thats what happens with a long exposure with wind...


Canon 6D, & Sony α6000
Own: 24-105mm f/4L | Tamron 150-600mm f/5-6.3 | Rokinon 14mm f/1.8
Want: 24-70mm f/2.8 L II | 70-200mm f/2.8 L II
Website: Jordyn Murdock Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,610 views & 2 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
Will this photo look okay at 45x30?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
1508 guests, 123 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.