pinolero newbie wrote in post #17815184
Mickeyb, I'm still on the outskirts. We had very similar kits when you had Canon. Care to share your positives and negatives with the switch?
A6000 Positives
--image quality and detail, particularly with good glass (but the kit lens can produce too!). With the FE55 1.8 the IQ is crazy good. In my brief test run with the Minolta 200 2.8 HS the IQ appears to be competitive with my 6D/EF 200 2.8ii combo--which is saying something. The IQ I get from the A6000 is so good, that I feel greedy for getting an A7R. But to be sure, both have their place.
--AF is very good and the way it gets the eye(s) in focus has really brought my keeper rate up.
--the ability to run and gun. Live view focuses as fast and accurate as it does through the EVF, and that comes in handy. I shoot from the hip with results like I never thought could be possible Tilting screen helps a lot with this!
--lightweight and small body, especially with the kit lens, encourages me to take it almost everywhere.
--11 FPS has been useful to me a few times already.
--Very good video AF and quality (in my very humble opinion, grain of salt probably)
--The grip is surprisingly good and comfortable. It isn't 60D or 6D good, but better than either the T4i or T3i. For that matter, better than the A7R IMO.
--It is not an intimidating camera for guest shooters or the general public.
A6000 Negatives
--Native long-ish lens selection. I really did not want to adapt lenses, but the lack of a 200mm f2.8 option has me adapting a 25+ year-old Minolta via A-mount adapter. The combo, both bought used, ran me a combined $860. I would gladly pay like $1300ish for a comparable native mount option . . . similarly for a 135 F2 or F1.8 option, although I could see that being a cool $2K.
--Body construction is not up to canon DSLR standards, and that is part of the weight/bulk tradeoff. Lacks weather sealing, and I've already sent one back for an error message after having it out during a string of very humid Florida days.
--Eats through batteries pretty good, although not as much as the A7R. I get about 500 shots or so on a battery not really trying to conserve power. Glad they are cheap.
--Neck strap it comes with isn't real good and not real comfy.
--The controls are at least adequate, but could be better. With the awesome AF, it really is begging for a joystick.
I'm neutral on the menu system, and getting used to it more and more. I like it better than the Nikon menus, maybe not as much as Canon.
Sony A7RIII, Tamron 28mm 2.8 Di III OSD M1:2, Sonnar T* FE 55mm f/1.8 ZA, Canon 200mm 2.8L ii, Sigma MC-11, HVL-F43M
Flickr