pinolero newbie wrote in post #17815957
It surprises me that you did sell this one, as you said the Sigma 50 Art and the 135 are like a cheat code. I really enjoy the combo. I don't know if it's just Gas....
And I still mean that--the 50A/135L was truly an excellent combo for me. Problem was, I kept whacking my toddlers in the head with the ~5LB combo on the head when we were out and about if I had my camera slung over my shoulder. It made me feel terrible! I wanted a lighter, smaller kit and that is why I switched.
I just don't feel like I'm sacrificing with my switch, but it is an adjustment. Leaving the Canon familiarity was and is hard. As pedestrian as the tracking could be on the 6D, it did ok with the 135L or 200 2.8 L. The A6000 with the adapted Minolta 200 2.8 HS either won't really track or I need to learn how to get it to via the menu. My first 300 shots with the adapted Minolta, it isn't giving me the IQ the Canon equivalent did--even on a 60D or T4i--and certainly not the smooth bokeh. I have yet to try it on the A7R, though.
The FE 55 1.8 is, however, a slightly better lens than the 50A. The margin is not big, but it is there in bokeh and color reproduction. Focusing speed is fast on both lenses, with the FE 55 being crazy-fast on the A6000.
Lastly, I tried out the HVL-F43M flash the other night at an event and I definitely need to get more familiar with it. My first impression is that I am going to miss my 580exii, though. It didn't seem as powerful, and the mount is made of plastic instead of metal--which to me is crazytown.
Sony A7RIII, Tamron 28mm 2.8 Di III OSD M1:2, Sonnar T* FE 55mm f/1.8 ZA, Canon 200mm 2.8L ii, Sigma MC-11, HVL-F43M
Flickr