Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Other Digital Cameras Fuji Digital Cameras 
Thread started 03 Dec 2014 (Wednesday) 07:50
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

X100, X100s, X100T photos

 
genesimmons
Goldmember
Avatar
1,845 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 952
Joined Aug 2013
Location: bc canada
     
Jan 15, 2016 13:43 |  #691

i don't have my new to me x100 but will have very soon,between it and my sony a7 and olympus em5 my poor 70d hasn't been touched in over a year,its very lonely sitting in its case haha.


OLYMPUS EM1 M2. 12-100 F4 PRO.75mm f1.8,fisheye f1.8 pro. SONY A7 various manual lenses. FUJI X100
https://www.flickr.com​/photos/100085318@N08/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
Dom ­ Chapman
Member
76 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 41
Joined Aug 2014
     
Jan 15, 2016 14:39 |  #692

gnome chompski wrote in post #17859349 (external link)
Funny, my 6D is suffering the same fate as your:-P:-P

ha there's a trend appearing here! my 6D has also suffered after getting the X100S! Amongst other things, it just handles ISO so much better!


6D | X100S | 24-105L | 24mm 1.4 L II
flickr (external link) Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gnome ­ chompski
Goldmember
1,252 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 135
Joined Jun 2013
Location: oakland, ca
     
Jan 15, 2016 16:24 |  #693

honestly, the only time I drag out my 6D is for macro stuff.


Tumblr (external link)
Flickr (external link)
Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
The ­ Dark ­ Knight
Goldmember
1,187 posts
Likes: 48
Joined Apr 2012
     
Jan 15, 2016 16:54 as a reply to  @ Dom Chapman's post |  #694

Whoa, are you saying the X100s handles high ISO better than the 6D? I owned both for a while, and the X100s was a great camera, but 6D's high ISO capabilities were much better imo.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dom ­ Chapman
Member
76 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 41
Joined Aug 2014
     
Jan 15, 2016 18:23 as a reply to  @ The Dark Knight's post |  #695

maybe I've just been unlucky with my 6D or the 24-105 that came with it but anywhere near 1000 iso gets pretty noisy. The X100S handles that ISO so much better and there is not nearly as much noise in the images.

The 24mm L II is better at higher ISO's on the 6D though.


6D | X100S | 24-105L | 24mm 1.4 L II
flickr (external link) Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gnome ­ chompski
Goldmember
1,252 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 135
Joined Jun 2013
Location: oakland, ca
     
Jan 15, 2016 18:27 |  #696

hmm, i shoot my 6D at like 12,800 and is generally acceptable...


Tumblr (external link)
Flickr (external link)
Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dom ­ Chapman
Member
76 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 41
Joined Aug 2014
Post edited over 2 years ago by Dom Chapman.
     
Jan 15, 2016 18:39 as a reply to  @ gnome chompski's post |  #697

Then you sir, are lucky! And I clearly have a below par 6D.

Taking images with the 24-105 L at ISO 3200 f4 creates a grainy image.

Although this is getting slightly off thread topic ;-)a


6D | X100S | 24-105L | 24mm 1.4 L II
flickr (external link) Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jay-Bird
Senior Member
Avatar
804 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 25
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Las Cruces, New Mexico
     
Jan 16, 2016 18:23 as a reply to  @ post 17857336 |  #698

Thank you! Love this camera!


Facebook:https://www.facebook.c​om/ZeroedInPhotography (external link)
http://www.zeroedinpho​tography.wordpress.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
welshwizard1971
Goldmember
1,340 posts
Likes: 935
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Southampton Hampshire UK
     
Jan 17, 2016 01:12 |  #699

Dom Chapman wrote in post #17859742 (external link)
Then you sir, are lucky! And I clearly have a below par 6D.

Taking images with the 24-105 L at ISO 3200 f4 creates a grainy image.

Although this is getting slightly off thread topic ;-)a

what are the in camera NR settings? played around with them?


5DIII, 40D, 16-35L 35 ART 50 ART 100L macro, 24-70 L Mk2, 135L 200L 70-200L f4 IS
Hype chimping - The act of looking at your screen after every shot, then wildly behaving like it's the best picture in the world, to try and impress other photographers around you.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GlimmerMan
Goldmember
Avatar
1,460 posts
Likes: 500
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Houston, TX USA
     
Jan 17, 2016 07:04 |  #700

Had some beautiful camping weather this past Friday (although Saturday morning was cold and raining... blah).

1) Lemonade: 028-23 mm-ISO 1600-1-20 sec at f - 8.0

IMAGE: https://farm2.staticflickr.com/1568/24435316715_19277b740e_c.jpg

2) BBQ Makes You Happy: 23 mm-ISO 200-1-420 sec at f - 4.0
IMAGE: https://farm2.staticflickr.com/1457/24139713440_f03b35ba0c_b.jpg

3) Vigilance: 23 mm-ISO 200-1-75 sec at f - 5.6 (B&W Film Sim w/ Red Filter - and Silver Efex)
IMAGE: https://farm2.staticflickr.com/1614/23807114924_429e2df898_c.jpg

T1i // 24-105L // Nifty Fifty // 10-22

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Reiep
Senior Member
Avatar
449 posts
Gallery: 112 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 790
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Orléans, France / Cluj-Napoca, Romania
     
Jan 18, 2016 06:01 as a reply to  @ The Dark Knight's post |  #701

My very un-scientific observations tend to let me think that the X100T produces a thinner luminance noise, while the 6D produces a thicker color noise. While the X100T is noisier, it cleans better that the 6D IMHO.


Website (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Instagram (external link) | Flickr (external link) | 500px (external link) | Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aladyforty
Goldmember
Avatar
3,770 posts
Gallery: 397 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 4495
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Albany: Western Australia
     
Jan 18, 2016 08:49 |  #702

Still using my X100, had it since 2011

IMAGE: https://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5738/21138318864_f107005f60_b.jpg

IMAGE: https://c1.staticflickr.com/1/719/21770994956_fe53733377_b.jpg

5DIII 7DII Fuji X100 Fuji X10 17-40L 135L 70-200F4ISL Tamron 150-600
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com​/photos/25426422@N00/ (external link)
Birding page (archives cant add to them, lost password) https://www.flickr.com​/photos/59111660@N08/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GlimmerMan
Goldmember
Avatar
1,460 posts
Likes: 500
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Houston, TX USA
     
Jan 18, 2016 18:30 |  #703

aladyforty wrote in post #17862685 (external link)
Still using my X100, had it since 2011
QUOTED IMAGE
QUOTED IMAGE

Beautiful images.


T1i // 24-105L // Nifty Fifty // 10-22

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Snafoo
Goldmember
Avatar
1,431 posts
Gallery: 92 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 705
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Peculiar
     
Jan 18, 2016 20:19 |  #704

welshwizard1971 wrote in post #17861099 (external link)
what are the in camera NR settings? played around with them?

Along those lines, are you working with raw or jpeg? If jpeg, beware of generalizations unless you know how each camera is configured.


http://www.jonstot.com​/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jason ­ C
Goldmember
4,735 posts
Gallery: 318 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 992
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Calabasas, CA
     
Jan 19, 2016 10:51 |  #705

IMAGE: https://farm2.staticflickr.com/1577/23856753003_a97327c03c_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/Cm96​vD  (external link)

X100S
1/125th sec
f/5.6
iso 12,800
in-camera jpeg cropped


jason

Equipment & Feedback
"I am not interested in shooting new things-I am interested to see things new"--Ernst Haas

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

329,163 views & 2,165 likes for this thread
X100, X100s, X100T photos
FORUMS Other Digital Cameras Fuji Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is lipartyrides
396 guests, 255 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.