Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 16 Feb 2016 (Tuesday) 23:26
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Portrait Critique

 
gabe212
Member
Avatar
246 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 822
Joined Feb 2016
     
Feb 16, 2016 23:26 |  #1

I've been using a reflector only. No flash. Do you think I need a flash? Will it help the quality?

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/02/2/LQ_775361.jpg
Photo from gabe212's gallery.
Image hosted by forum (775361)

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/02/1/LQ_773951.jpg
Photo from gabe212's gallery.
Image hosted by forum (773951)



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chauncey
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,696 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 466
Joined Jun 2007
Location: MI/CO
     
Feb 17, 2016 05:54 |  #2

#1...you need to control your background as it draws the eye from the subject.


The things you do for yourself die with you, the things you do for others live forever.
A man's worth should be judged, not when he basks in the sun, but how he faces the storm.

My stuff...http://1x.com/member/c​hauncey43 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hannya
Goldmember
Avatar
1,062 posts
Likes: 66
Joined Apr 2008
Location: UK
     
Feb 17, 2016 07:52 |  #3

As above, although I don't think its that distracting, and did you use a gold reflector? Liking #2.


“Your first 10,000 photographs are your worst.” ― Henri Cartier-Bresson

Sports Pics (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gabe212
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
246 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 822
Joined Feb 2016
     
Feb 17, 2016 08:08 |  #4

I used a silver reflector, I'm thinking of trying the white for a softer light next time. This is another edit, kind of softens her a bit.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/02/3/LQ_776201.jpg
Image hosted by forum (776201) © gabe212 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
Combating camera shame since 1977...
Avatar
9,925 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 2398
Joined Jun 2011
Location: The Uwharrie Mts, NC
Post edited over 7 years ago by Left Handed Brisket.
     
Feb 17, 2016 08:12 |  #5

gabe212 wrote in post #17901745 (external link)
I used a silver reflector, I'm thinking of trying the white for a softer light next time. This is another edit, kind of softens her a bit.
Hosted photo: posted by gabe212 in
./showthread.php?p=179​01745&i=i213148316
forum: Critique Corner

it's not so much the color of the reflector, it is the placement. Needs to be at least a high as the head. What you have now is sometimes called monster lighting, where the subject is lit from below. Think of placing a flashlight under your chin and telling a ghost story around a campfire, not exactly flattering.

i would also turn her shoulders a bit more square to the camera.


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gabe212
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
246 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 822
Joined Feb 2016
     
Feb 17, 2016 09:08 |  #6

heres some more

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/02/3/LQ_776208.jpg
Image hosted by forum (776208) © gabe212 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/02/3/LQ_776209.jpg
Image hosted by forum (776209) © gabe212 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jarvis ­ Creative ­ Studios
Goldmember
Avatar
2,508 posts
Gallery: 28 photos
Likes: 1107
Joined Aug 2013
Location: Johnson City, Tennessee
     
Feb 17, 2016 09:21 |  #7

I like #2. I would just caution you on over sharpening. You can tell they're over sharpened due to the "halo" effect that's present in drastic color or contrast changes. I immediately noticed it on the boys fingers and teeth in #3.


WEBSITE (external link)
flickr (external link)
Sony ZV-1 || Sony a7RIV || Sony a9 || Sony a1 || Sony FE 20mm f1.8 G || Sony FE 24-70 f2.8 GM || Sony FE 50mm f1.2 GM || Sony FE 90mm f2.8 Macro G OSS || Sony FE 135mm f1.8 GM || Sony FE 200-600 f5.6-6.3 G OSS || Godox speedlights and strobes

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mamaof2
Goldmember
Avatar
1,361 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 95
Joined May 2014
     
Feb 17, 2016 09:31 |  #8

I agree that the background is to distracting in #1. I like #2


Jessi
T4i/Nifty fifty/ 18-55/ DCR 250 macro attachment/ 55-250 stm/ Few old film lenses
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dballphotography
Senior Member
Avatar
497 posts
Likes: 121
Joined Sep 2012
Location: UK
     
Feb 17, 2016 10:25 |  #9

I dont mind the back ground in 1, its not ideal but i can live with it. The image does look slightly soft to me and the pose needs work, as some one mentioned slightly squarer on to the camera, maybe drop the shoulder a touch and straighten her back. Also you have cropped her at the wrist which im not so keen on.


Dave
1 x Nikon D810 - 2 x Nikon D750 - Nikon 24-70 2.8G - Sigma 35mm 1.4Art - Sigma 50mm 1.4Art- Nikon 85mm 1.4G - Lots of lights and other stuffs.
www.dballphotography.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gabe212
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
246 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 822
Joined Feb 2016
     
Feb 17, 2016 12:10 |  #10

Thank you everyone! Great advice.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Chet
showed up to keep the place interesting
44,018 posts
Gallery: 132 photos
Likes: 2462
Joined Sep 2007
     
Feb 17, 2016 12:13 |  #11

The dog picture is pretty sweet.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alveric
Goldmember
Avatar
4,598 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Likes: 1061
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Canada
     
Feb 17, 2016 12:38 |  #12
bannedPermanent ban

I don't care for the posing in #1: she looks affected with lordosis and her facial expression is kinda listless. Furthermore, you placed your reflector too low and got spooky lighting, which doesn't flatter her at all.


'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
absplastic
Goldmember
Avatar
1,643 posts
Gallery: 40 photos
Likes: 541
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
Feb 17, 2016 22:37 |  #13

The background in #1 doesn't bother me personally, but I agree about the lighting issue. It's normal to have a reflector down low and aimed up at your subject when you have a stronger key light coming from above, such that the reflector is just filling in shadows under the chin. But here, the reflector has to be considered as the key light and placed high, because the sun is backlighting her. I love #2, that low-contrast vintage look is perfect for the subject.


5DSR, 6D, 16-35/4L IS, 85L II, 100L macro, Sigma 150-600C
SL1, 10-18 STM, 18-55 STM, 40 STM, 50 STM
My (mostly) Fashion and Portraiture Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link) (NSFW)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,775 views & 10 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
Portrait Critique
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
1304 guests, 135 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.